HESI LPN
Pediatric Practice Exam HESI
1. When a mother confides in the nurse that she is contemplating divorce, which suggestion by the nurse would help minimize the effects on the child?
- A. Tell the child together using appropriate terms.
- B. Reassure the child that no one loves him more than his parents.
- C. Engage in special activities with the child to compensate for the divorce.
- D. Discuss your feelings with the child.
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is A. It is essential for both parents to inform the child about the divorce together, using age-appropriate language. This approach can help minimize the negative impact on the child by providing a sense of unity and understanding. Choice B is incorrect because offering false reassurance about love may not address the child's concerns effectively, as the situation is complex. Choice C is not suitable as engaging in special activities cannot substitute for the emotional stability that the child may lose due to the divorce. Choice D is incorrect because sharing the parent's feelings may burden the child with adult emotions, which could be overwhelming and confusing for their developmental stage.
2. A healthcare provider is assessing a child with suspected rheumatic fever. What clinical manifestation is the provider likely to observe?
- A. Jaundice
- B. Peeling skin on the hands and feet
- C. High fever
- D. Severe joint pain
Correct answer: D
Rationale: Severe joint pain is a classic symptom of rheumatic fever, resulting from inflammation of the joints. Rheumatic fever primarily affects the joints, heart, skin, and the central nervous system. Jaundice (Choice A) is not typically associated with rheumatic fever. Peeling skin on the hands and feet (Choice B) is more characteristic of conditions like Kawasaki disease. While high fever (Choice C) can be present in rheumatic fever, it is not as specific or characteristic as severe joint pain.
3. When a family decides to withhold 'extraordinary care' for a newborn with severe abnormalities, what does this decision indicate?
- A. The newborn has no rights.
- B. It is the same as euthanasia.
- C. It is illegal professional practice.
- D. The newborn is being allowed to die.
Correct answer: D
Rationale: When a family decides to withhold 'extraordinary care' for a newborn with severe abnormalities, it means that aggressive interventions will not be pursued, allowing the newborn to die naturally. This decision is legal and ethical, respecting the principle of non-maleficence by avoiding unnecessary suffering. Choice A is incorrect because all individuals, including newborns, have rights, but the decision to withhold extraordinary care is based on ethical considerations. Choice B is incorrect as withholding care is not the same as euthanasia, which involves actively ending life. Choice C is incorrect as long as the decision is made within legal and ethical boundaries, it is not considered illegal professional practice.
4. A child with diabetes insipidus is being treated with vasopressin. The nurse would assess the child closely for signs and symptoms of which condition?
- A. Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH)
- B. Thyroid storm
- C. Cushing syndrome
- D. Vitamin D toxicity
Correct answer: A
Rationale: When a child with diabetes insipidus is treated with vasopressin, the nurse should closely monitor for signs and symptoms of Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone (SIADH). Vasopressin, also known as antidiuretic hormone, helps retain water in the body. Excessive vasopressin administration can lead to water retention, dilutional hyponatremia, and potentially result in SIADH. Choices B, C, and D are incorrect because they are not directly associated with the use of vasopressin in treating diabetes insipidus.
5. The healthcare provider is assessing the 'resilience' of a 16-year-old boy. Which exemplifies an external protective factor that may help promote resilience in this child?
- A. His ability to take control of his own decisions
- B. His ability to accept his own limitations
- C. His caring relationship with members of his family
- D. His knowledge of when to continue or stop with goal achievement
Correct answer: C
Rationale: A caring relationship with family members is an external protective factor that promotes resilience in individuals, especially in adolescents. This support system provides a sense of security, stability, and emotional connection, which can help the teenager navigate challenges and setbacks. Choices A, B, and D allude to internal factors related to personal decision-making, self-awareness, and goal management, which are important but do not directly represent external protective factors involving external relationships or resources.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
HESI LPN Basic
$69.99/ 30 days
- 50,000 Questions with answers
- All HESI courses Coverage
- 30 days access @ $69.99
HESI LPN Premium
$149.99/ 90 days
- 50,000 Questions with answers
- All HESI courses Coverage
- 30 days access @ $149.99