Nursing Elites

1. What is one benefit of using a large sample size in an experiment?

• A. Chance variation is less likely to affect the results.
• B. The possibility of a placebo effect is eliminated.
• C. The experiment will be double-blind.
• D. The control group will be similar to the experimental group.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Corrected Rationale: Using a large sample size reduces the likelihood of chance variation affecting the results, providing more reliable data. Choice B is incorrect because the placebo effect is related to participants' beliefs, not sample size. Choice C is incorrect as double-blind refers to a method of reducing bias, not directly related to sample size. Choice D is incorrect because the similarity between the control and experimental groups is not solely dependent on sample size.

2. A child develops a strong dislike of noodle soup after consuming a bowl while sick with the flu. Her reaction is an example of a food-related ___.

• A. habit
• B. social interaction
• C. emotional turmoil
• D. negative association

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The correct answer is 'negative association.' A negative association occurs when a person develops a dislike for a food due to a past negative experience, such as getting sick after eating it. In this case, the child's dislike of noodle soup is specifically linked to the negative experience of consuming it while sick with the flu. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect because the situation described does not relate to habit formation, social interactions, or emotional turmoil, but rather to a learned aversion based on a specific negative event.

3. What is a common side effect of the antibiotic tetracycline in children?

• A. Discoloration of teeth
• B. Increased appetite
• C. Elevated blood glucose levels
• D. Decreased bone density

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Discoloration of teeth is a well-known side effect of tetracycline, especially when administered to children below 8 years of age. Tetracycline can bind to calcium ions in developing teeth, causing them to become discolored and appear yellow or brown. Increased appetite, elevated blood glucose levels, and decreased bone density are not commonly associated with the use of tetracycline in children, making them incorrect choices.

4. What is an important consideration when administering medications to a child with a history of chronic renal failure?

• A. Increased frequency of medication administration
• B. Adjustments in dosage due to altered drug metabolism
• C. Avoidance of all medications
• D. Use of only intravenous medications

Correct answer: B

Rationale: When administering medications to a child with chronic renal failure, it is crucial to consider adjustments in dosage due to altered drug metabolism. Children with chronic renal failure may have impaired drug excretion, leading to potential drug accumulation and toxicity. Increasing the frequency of medication administration (choice A) may not address the altered drug metabolism issue and could increase the risk of adverse effects. Avoiding all medications (choice C) is not practical or safe as some medications may be necessary for the child's health. Using only intravenous medications (choice D) is not always required and may not be the best route of administration for all medications needed.

5. Before publication in a reputable journal, the findings of a research study must undergo scrutiny by experts in the field in a process known as what?

• A. peer review
• B. cohort review
• C. research intervention
• D. double-blind examination

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A: peer review. Before publication, research findings must undergo peer review, where experts in the field evaluate the validity and significance of the study. Choice B, cohort review, is incorrect as it does not involve the same level of evaluation by experts. Choice C, research intervention, is not a term used to describe the evaluation process before publication. Choice D, double-blind examination, refers to a study design where neither the participants nor the researchers know who is receiving a particular treatment, which is not the same as the peer review process.

Similar Questions