Nursing Elites

1. An older adult client from a minority culture refuses to eat at the nursing home, stating, 'I just do not like the food here.' What factor should the staff assess for this problem?

• A. The client does not like eating with other residents of the home.
• B. The client is using this as an excuse to go home.
• C. The food served may not be culturally appropriate.
• D. The food served may violate religious beliefs.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C. Residents in long-term care settings often have limited food choices, which may not align with their cultural preferences. When assessing why a client is refusing to eat, it is essential to consider if the food served is culturally appropriate. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect. There is no indication in the scenario that the client's refusal to eat is due to not liking to eat with other residents, using it as an excuse to go home, or violating religious beliefs.

2. Following a recent lawsuit that implicated one of their colleagues, the nursing staff at an assisted-living facility are especially aware of the need to safeguard themselves legally. Which of the following measures should the nurses take? Select one that does not apply.

• A. Investigate whether their liability insurance is sufficient
• B. Ensure that work performed by unlicensed care staff under their supervision is adequate
• C. Avoid admitting residents who have living wills or advance directives
• D. Assess the competence of employees under their supervision

Correct answer: C

Rationale: Denying admission to residents with living wills or advance directives is not a legal safeguard measure and may be considered discriminatory. Measures like investigating liability insurance adequacy, ensuring adequate work by unlicensed staff, and assessing employee competence are all valid ways for nurses to protect themselves legally. These measures help in ensuring proper care, reducing risks, and maintaining a high standard of practice.

3. A nurse at a rehabilitation center is preparing a care plan for a 71-year-old post-stroke patient who has shown significant improvement in function and who is ready to return to the community. In the nurse's efforts to mobilize family caregiving, which of the following statements provides the most accurate criterion for inclusion in the category of 'family'?

• A. The patient's spouse, biological children, and closest friends
• B. Any unpaid person who has expressed sincere interest in the patient's condition and provided hands-on care since his admission to the facility
• C. Anyone who self-identifies as being a member of the patient's family
• D. Any individual who fulfills the patient's family functions

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The most accurate criterion for inclusion in the category of 'family' when mobilizing family caregiving is identifying individuals who fulfill family functions. Choice D is the correct answer as it emphasizes the importance of individuals who perform essential family functions for the patient. This criterion is crucial as it prioritizes the practical support and care provided by individuals over biological relationships (Choice A), self-identification (Choice C), or willingness to provide care (Choice B), which may not always translate to fulfilling necessary family functions.

4. A nurse has been providing care for a 69-year-old female client who has recently had her right foot amputated as a result of a chronic diabetic foot ulcer. The nurse undertook to perform debridement of the wound despite her lack of relevant education and experience. The client experienced permanent nerve damage as a result of the nurse's misguided efforts. Which category of legal liability is most likely relevant in this case?

• A. Larceny
• B. Assault
• C. Invasion of privacy
• D. Negligence

Correct answer: D

Rationale: In this case, the most likely relevant category of legal liability is negligence. Negligence involves the commission of an improper act, as exemplified by the nurse's actions of performing a procedure without the necessary education and experience, leading to permanent nerve damage for the client. Larceny refers to theft, assault involves a deliberate threat to harm, and invasion of privacy pertains to the violation of a person's right to privacy. Therefore, in this scenario, the nurse's actions align more closely with negligence.

5. An investigation into reports of substandard care on the subacute geriatric unit of a hospital has been undertaken. Which of the following events is representative of malpractice on the part of the nursing staff?

• A. A client with a documented history of seizures was left with his bed raised and with bedrails not in place, resulting in a fall and head injury
• B. A client was sent for a colonoscopy, after which it was learned that the client had never given written consent for the procedure
• C. A client with a diagnosis of vascular dementia was found wandering in the hall outside the unit
• D. An immobile client was not turned over the course of a night shift and developed a pressure ulcer on her coccyx

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Answer A is correct as it includes all the components of malpractice: duty, negligence, and injury. The nursing staff failed in their duty by leaving a client with a documented history of seizures unattended with bedrails not in place, resulting in a fall and head injury. Answer B involves an issue related to consent, which is the responsibility of the physician, not the nursing staff. Answer C does not demonstrate negligence or harm caused by the nursing staff. Answer D also shows negligence by failing to turn an immobile client, leading to a pressure ulcer, but it lacks a direct connection to the duty of the nursing staff in preventing harm.

Similar Questions