Nursing Elites

1. An older adult client from a minority culture refuses to eat at the nursing home, stating, 'I just do not like the food here.' What factor should the staff assess for this problem?

• A. The client does not like eating with other residents of the home.
• B. The client is using this as an excuse to go home.
• C. The food served may not be culturally appropriate.
• D. The food served may violate religious beliefs.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C. Residents in long-term care settings often have limited food choices, which may not align with their cultural preferences. When assessing why a client is refusing to eat, it is essential to consider if the food served is culturally appropriate. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect. There is no indication in the scenario that the client's refusal to eat is due to not liking to eat with other residents, using it as an excuse to go home, or violating religious beliefs.

2. Why might nurses not be the best choice to obtain informed consent from patients?

• A. Nurses may be tempted to influence the patient's decision in subtle ways.
• B. Nurses may not be able to answer some of the medical questions the patient asks.
• C. A signature obtained by anyone other than a physician will not stand up in court.
• D. Under the law, nurses are only allowed to act as witnesses to informed consent signatures.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: Nurses may not have the medical expertise to answer all the questions that patients may have regarding their treatment, which is a crucial aspect of obtaining informed consent. While nurses should not influence a patient's decision, it is not a major reason why they should not obtain informed consent. Signatures obtained by nurses are legally binding, and although nurses often act as witnesses, there is no legal restriction preventing them from obtaining informed consent itself.

3. An investigation into reports of substandard care on the subacute geriatric unit of a hospital has been undertaken. Which of the following events is representative of malpractice on the part of the nursing staff?

• A. A client with a documented history of seizures was left with his bed raised and with bedrails not in place, resulting in a fall and head injury
• B. A client was sent for a colonoscopy, after which it was learned that the client had never given written consent for the procedure
• C. A client with a diagnosis of vascular dementia was found wandering in the hall outside the unit
• D. An immobile client was not turned over the course of a night shift and developed a pressure ulcer on her coccyx

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Answer A is correct as it includes all the components of malpractice: duty, negligence, and injury. The nursing staff failed in their duty by leaving a client with a documented history of seizures unattended with bedrails not in place, resulting in a fall and head injury. Answer B involves an issue related to consent, which is the responsibility of the physician, not the nursing staff. Answer C does not demonstrate negligence or harm caused by the nursing staff. Answer D also shows negligence by failing to turn an immobile client, leading to a pressure ulcer, but it lacks a direct connection to the duty of the nursing staff in preventing harm.

4. When in doubt about using restraints on an agitated patient, it is prudent for nurses to:

• A. Restrain the patient for their own safety
• B. Use minor restraints such as a bed side rail or a tray on a wheelchair
• C. Use alternatives such as a bed alarm with increased staff supervision
• D. Avoid using any device or procedure to limit liability

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C: 'Use alternatives such as a bed alarm with increased staff supervision.' The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) established strict standards on restraint use in long-term care facilities. Restraints can be considered a form of false imprisonment and neglect, leading to potential litigation. Therefore, it is advisable to avoid restraints whenever possible. A bed alarm coupled with enhanced staff supervision provides an effective and non-restrictive approach for managing an agitated patient. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because restraining the patient, using minor restraints, or avoiding all devices without providing an alternative can pose risks to patient safety, violate regulations, or increase liability concerns.

5. During a busy shift, a registered nurse directed an unlicensed care provider to change the dressing and perform wound care on an older adult client's surgical incision, an act that exists outside of the unlicensed care provider's scope of practice. Which of the following statements best captures the legal context of this event?

• A. The unlicensed care provider is solely responsible for the inappropriate practice.
• B. The nurse can be held liable for the actions of the unlicensed care provider.
• C. Liability rests with the nurse manager of the unit.
• D. In the absence of documented harm to the client, the action is legally permissible.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B. Under the doctrine of respondent superior, nurses can be held liable for the actions of individuals under their supervision. In this scenario, the registered nurse directed the unlicensed care provider to perform a task outside their scope of practice, making the nurse accountable for the consequences. Choice A is incorrect because the responsibility is shared between the nurse and the unlicensed care provider. Choice C is incorrect as the nurse manager may not be directly responsible for the actions of the registered nurse. Choice D is incorrect because legality is not determined solely by the absence of harm; acting within one's legal scope of practice is essential to ensure patient safety.

Similar Questions