Nursing Elites

1. When in doubt about using restraints on an agitated patient, it is prudent for nurses to:

• A. Restrain the patient for their own safety
• B. Use minor restraints such as a bed side rail or a tray on a wheelchair
• C. Use alternatives such as a bed alarm with increased staff supervision
• D. Avoid using any device or procedure to limit liability

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C: 'Use alternatives such as a bed alarm with increased staff supervision.' The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) established strict standards on restraint use in long-term care facilities. Restraints can be considered a form of false imprisonment and neglect, leading to potential litigation. Therefore, it is advisable to avoid restraints whenever possible. A bed alarm coupled with enhanced staff supervision provides an effective and non-restrictive approach for managing an agitated patient. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because restraining the patient, using minor restraints, or avoiding all devices without providing an alternative can pose risks to patient safety, violate regulations, or increase liability concerns.

2. An 81-year-old female client has presented to the emergency department accompanied by her daughter with whom she lives. The daughter states that her mother has experienced a recent series of falls, which have resulted in her facial and arm bruises. The client smells of urine and is noticeably emaciated, unkempt, and anxious while the daughter berates her during the nurse's assessment. What is the nurse's responsibility in this situation?

• A. Determine the daughter's legal status with regard to her mother's financial affairs
• B. Report suspected elder abuse
• C. Establish whether the client has a durable power of attorney in place
• D. Obtain medical records regarding prior admissions for similar problems

Correct answer: B

Rationale: In cases of suspected elder abuse, the nurse is responsible for reporting his or her suspicions to the relevant authorities. In this scenario, the signs of elder abuse are evident, such as the client's bruises, unkempt appearance, and the daughter's behavior. Determining the daughter's legal status or the client's power of attorney are not immediate priorities when abuse is suspected. Obtaining medical records for prior admissions is also not the primary concern in this situation.

3. Based on the information provided, what can be inferred about the nurse who has been working for several years in a long-term care facility with many Middle Eastern residents?

• A. The nurse's knowledge and skills provide expected care for clients in this demographic.
• B. The nurse is knowledgeable about Middle Eastern culture and respects and values providing culturally competent care.
• C. The nurse is attempting to overcompensate for cultural blindness and ethnocentrism within the community.
• D. This employment has allowed the nurse to demonstrate ethnic identity and cultural bias to a specific group of people.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The nurse in the scenario is likely knowledgeable about Middle Eastern culture and values providing culturally competent care to the residents. This inference can be made based on the nurse being well-respected and effective in providing care to this population. Choice A is incorrect because it only focuses on the nurse's knowledge and skills, not specifically about cultural competence. Choice C is incorrect as there is no indication of overcompensation; the nurse is described as effective and well-respected. Choice D is incorrect as there is no evidence to suggest that the nurse is demonstrating ethnic identity or cultural bias, but rather respecting and providing care tailored to the cultural needs of the residents.

4. What is the most important advantage of an advance directive?

• A. Such a directive indicates how medical decisions are to be made in case a patient is unable to communicate their wishes.
• B. It spares the family the burden of making significant decisions for a patient regarding terminal care.
• C. It ensures that a person's property is distributed according to their wishes after death, avoiding legal complications.
• D. It allows individuals to appoint a guardian for themselves in case of incapacity, without involving the court system.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: An advance directive, or living will, is a legal document that specifies an individual's preferences for medical treatment if they are unable to communicate their wishes. The most important advantage of an advance directive is that it spares the family from having to make challenging decisions about terminal care on behalf of the patient. Choice A is incorrect because advance directives pertain to healthcare decisions, not property matters. Choice C is incorrect as it refers to a will for property distribution, which is a different legal document. Choice D is incorrect as advance directives are not related to appointing guardians but rather focus on healthcare decision-making.

5. An investigation into reports of substandard care on the subacute geriatric unit of a hospital has been undertaken. Which of the following events is representative of malpractice on the part of the nursing staff?

• A. A client with a documented history of seizures was left with his bed raised and with bedrails not in place, resulting in a fall and head injury
• B. A client was sent for a colonoscopy, after which it was learned that the client had never given written consent for the procedure
• C. A client with a diagnosis of vascular dementia was found wandering in the hall outside the unit
• D. An immobile client was not turned over the course of a night shift and developed a pressure ulcer on her coccyx

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Answer A is correct as it includes all the components of malpractice: duty, negligence, and injury. The nursing staff failed in their duty by leaving a client with a documented history of seizures unattended with bedrails not in place, resulting in a fall and head injury. Answer B involves an issue related to consent, which is the responsibility of the physician, not the nursing staff. Answer C does not demonstrate negligence or harm caused by the nursing staff. Answer D also shows negligence by failing to turn an immobile client, leading to a pressure ulcer, but it lacks a direct connection to the duty of the nursing staff in preventing harm.

Similar Questions