Nursing Elites

1. An 81-year-old female client was diagnosed one year ago with Alzheimer's disease following a noticeable increase in confusion. She now possesses a durable power of attorney. Which of the following statements most accurately conveys an aspect of this legal arrangement?

• A. The parameters of the arrangement must be revisited if the client's condition declines.
• B. The arrangement was most likely initiated by court order.
• C. The client appointed someone to take care of her affairs in the event that she becomes incompetent.
• D. The family has control of logistical arrangements for the client but must gain court permission around financial affairs.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C. Usually, a power of attorney becomes invalid if the individual granting it becomes incompetent, except in the case of a durable power of attorney. A durable power of attorney allows competent individuals to appoint someone to make decisions on their behalf in the event that they become incompetent. This legal arrangement is recommended for individuals with conditions like Alzheimer's disease where competency decline can be anticipated. It is not initiated by the court, unlike guardianship. A durable power of attorney encompasses both logistical and financial affairs, providing authority to the appointed person to act on behalf of the individual should they become incapacitated. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because they do not accurately describe the purpose and nature of a durable power of attorney in the context of planning for incompetency due to conditions like Alzheimer's disease.

2. Mr. K has dementia. Having a good deal of money, he has a private room at Haven Nursing Home. He is a retired industrialist whose children and current wife are already squabbling bitterly over his estate. During visits, they often get into shouting matches that disturb the other residents and Mr. K himself. How should an administrator handle this family?

• A. Emphasize that they must behave civilly when visiting
• B. Have them set up separate visiting schedules
• C. Ask them to stay away
• D. Close Mr. K's door when they visit

Correct answer: B

Rationale: There is little an administrator can do about this dysfunctional family's behavior, but Mr. K should not be upset by it, and the other residents deserve to be protected from shouting. By setting up separate visiting schedules, the family can continue to provide needed support for their husband and father. If they accidentally visit at the same time, the door can be kept closed until they leave.

3. Which of the following actions can a nurse safely take without risk of liability?

• A. Questioning a doctor's written orders for medication
• B. Permitting a volunteer to move a patient
• C. Using a blood pressure cuff that is sometimes sticking
• D. Asking a family member to deliver routine medication to a patient's room

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A: Questioning a doctor's written orders for medication. Under the doctrine of respondent superior, nurses can face liability risks for various actions. Permitting volunteers to move patients, using malfunctioning equipment, or tasking unqualified staff can pose liability risks. Questioning medication orders is a responsibility to ensure patient safety. It is crucial for nurses to clarify any doubts or raise concerns about medication orders to prevent potential harm to patients.

4. A nurse is providing end-of-life care to an older female client who practices Judaism. Which intervention would the nurse identify as potentially problematic for this client and her family?

• A. The client requires transfusions of packed red blood cells during care.
• B. Assessment by a male health care provider was required.
• C. An autopsy was ordered due to the client's unique disease etiology.
• D. A do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order was recommended by the care team.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C. Autopsy is often opposed in the context of Jewish religious and cultural beliefs, as it is seen as desecration of the body. While a person who is a Jehovah's Witness would be opposed to blood transfusions (choice A), a Muslim client may prefer to be cared for by someone of the same gender (choice B). A DNR order (choice D) is not noted to be a particular issue in the context of Jewish culture.

5. Nurse M obtains a signature on an informed consent form from Mr. Y, who is later shown to have a fluctuating level of mental competency. In this case, what is Nurse M's most likely legal position?

• A. Freedom from liability because Mr. Y signed the form
• B. Possibly liable for a violation of Mr. Y's rights
• C. Liable unless a malpractice insurance policy is in effect
• D. Not liable because no family member had a durable power of attorney

Correct answer: B

Rationale: An informed consent may be considered invalid if the patient does not fully understand what he or she is signing. Patients with a fluctuating level of mental function are incapable of granting legally sound consent. Nurse M could be held liable for a violation of Mr. Y's rights as he did not have the capacity to provide informed consent. The presence of an insurance policy and the legal status of family members are irrelevant in this context and do not absolve Nurse M of potential liability.

Similar Questions