Nursing Elites

1. An 81-year-old female client was diagnosed one year ago with Alzheimer's disease following a noticeable increase in confusion. She now possesses a durable power of attorney. Which of the following statements most accurately conveys an aspect of this legal arrangement?

• A. The parameters of the arrangement must be revisited if the client's condition declines.
• B. The arrangement was most likely initiated by court order.
• C. The client appointed someone to take care of her affairs in the event that she becomes incompetent.
• D. The family has control of logistical arrangements for the client but must gain court permission around financial affairs.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C. Usually, a power of attorney becomes invalid if the individual granting it becomes incompetent, except in the case of a durable power of attorney. A durable power of attorney allows competent individuals to appoint someone to make decisions on their behalf in the event that they become incompetent. This legal arrangement is recommended for individuals with conditions like Alzheimer's disease where competency decline can be anticipated. It is not initiated by the court, unlike guardianship. A durable power of attorney encompasses both logistical and financial affairs, providing authority to the appointed person to act on behalf of the individual should they become incapacitated. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because they do not accurately describe the purpose and nature of a durable power of attorney in the context of planning for incompetency due to conditions like Alzheimer's disease.

2. How does guardianship differ from power of attorney?

• A. The court appoints a guardian; an individual grants a power of attorney to someone else to make decisions on his or her behalf.
• B. Guardianship is legally binding whether or not an individual is competent; power of attorney applies only to the incompetent.
• C. Courts monitor the actions of those executing a power of attorney, but guardians are free to act on behalf of another as long as standards of 'reasonable prudence' are met.
• D. Guardianship stays in effect for one calendar year and must be renewed annually; power of attorney stays in effect until one or both parties choose to revoke it.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A. The key difference between guardianship and power of attorney is that the court appoints a guardian to make decisions on behalf of an individual who is deemed incompetent, while an individual grants a power of attorney to someone else to make decisions on their behalf when they are competent. Choice B is incorrect because both guardianship and power of attorney can apply to individuals who are competent or incompetent. Choice C is incorrect as guardians, like those with power of attorney, must act in the best interest of the individual they represent, and the level of oversight can vary. Choice D is incorrect as guardianship and power of attorney do not have fixed time limits; they remain in effect until revoked or ended by the appropriate legal process.

3. A nurse is providing end-of-life care to an older female client who practices Judaism. Which intervention would the nurse identify as potentially problematic for this client and her family?

• A. The client requires transfusions of packed red blood cells during care.
• B. Assessment by a male health care provider was required.
• C. An autopsy was ordered due to the client's unique disease etiology.
• D. A do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order was recommended by the care team.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C. Autopsy is often opposed in the context of Jewish religious and cultural beliefs, as it is seen as desecration of the body. While a person who is a Jehovah's Witness would be opposed to blood transfusions (choice A), a Muslim client may prefer to be cared for by someone of the same gender (choice B). A DNR order (choice D) is not noted to be a particular issue in the context of Jewish culture.

4. An investigation into reports of substandard care on the subacute geriatric unit of a hospital has been undertaken. Which of the following events is representative of malpractice on the part of the nursing staff?

• A. A client with a documented history of seizures was left with his bed raised and with bedrails not in place, resulting in a fall and head injury
• B. A client was sent for a colonoscopy, after which it was learned that the client had never given written consent for the procedure
• C. A client with a diagnosis of vascular dementia was found wandering in the hall outside the unit
• D. An immobile client was not turned over the course of a night shift and developed a pressure ulcer on her coccyx

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Answer A is correct as it includes all the components of malpractice: duty, negligence, and injury. The nursing staff failed in their duty by leaving a client with a documented history of seizures unattended with bedrails not in place, resulting in a fall and head injury. Answer B involves an issue related to consent, which is the responsibility of the physician, not the nursing staff. Answer C does not demonstrate negligence or harm caused by the nursing staff. Answer D also shows negligence by failing to turn an immobile client, leading to a pressure ulcer, but it lacks a direct connection to the duty of the nursing staff in preventing harm.

5. An elderly man has relied on one of his sons for his care. Now the son has become very involved with a religion other than the one in which he was raised. As a result, he now refuses to help his father. What can a nurse do to help in this family situation?

• A. Set up a family conference that includes the son
• B. Bring in help from other family members or outside
• C. Insist that the son help, along with other family members
• D. Ask the family's own spiritual adviser to intervene

Correct answer: A

Rationale: In this complex family situation, it is essential to approach the issue with sensitivity and understanding. Setting up a family conference that includes the son is the most appropriate action for the nurse to take. While it may seem challenging, there is a possibility that involving the son in a family discussion can help him understand the impact of his actions on his father and the rest of the family. By including him in the conversation, the son may realize the importance of his role in caring for his father. Insisting that the son help, along with other family members, could lead to resistance and further alienation. Asking the family's spiritual adviser to intervene may not be effective if the son is rebelling against the family's religion. If the family conference does not yield positive results, then bringing in help from other family members or an outside caregiver may become necessary to ensure the elderly man receives the care he needs.

Similar Questions