Nursing Elites

1. What is a standard of care?

• A. A relationship in which a nurse has assumed responsibility for the care of a patient
• B. A policy or procedure established by a health care agency or professional association
• C. The norm for what a reasonable individual would do in a similar circumstance
• D. A public law that, if violated, can result in liability for the nurse

Correct answer: C

Rationale: A standard of care is the level of care that a reasonably prudent person with similar training and experience would provide in a similar circumstance. Choice A is incorrect because it describes the nurse-patient relationship. Choice B is incorrect as it refers to specific policies or procedures. Choice D is incorrect as it describes a law rather than the expected level of care.

2. How might the nursing home's social worker help Ms. O's friends in visiting her?

• A. The social worker should defer to the nursing staff
• B. Help her friends find easier transportation
• C. Tell her to make friends at the dialysis center
• D. Ask other residents' families to bring her friends with them

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B. Ms. O's friends, who are elderly and cannot drive, ride buses to visit her. The social worker can help by finding easier transportation options for them. Not having family around, friends' visits can significantly impact Ms. O's well-being. It may be challenging for the friends to ask for help themselves, so the social worker can reach out to volunteer groups for assistance. Making friends at the dialysis center might not be feasible due to the nature of treatments. Asking other residents' families to bring her friends could burden them further and might deter them from helping. It's important to consider the friends' convenience and emotional support for Ms. O.

3. Which of the following is required in order for a healthcare provider to be legally justified in not attempting to save a client's life?

• A. A 'Do Not Resuscitate' (DNR) statement on the patient's care plan
• B. A 'No-Code' sign or symbol placed at the patient's bedside
• C. A 'No-Code' order written and signed on the physician's order sheet
• D. The next of kin's request for 'Do Not Resuscitate' orally or in writing

Correct answer: C

Rationale: To legally justify not attempting to save a client's life, a healthcare provider must have a 'No-Code' order written and signed on the physician's order sheet. Unless there is a specific order stating that resuscitation should not be performed, failure to do so can be considered negligence. A 'Do Not Resuscitate' statement on the care plan or a symbol at the bedside is not legally valid without the proper medical order. Additionally, a request from the next of kin, whether oral or written, is not a substitute for a signed physician's order.

4. How can the nurse best respond to this situation?

• A. The nurse should accept that the relationship plays a positive role for the man.
• B. The nurse should organize a family meeting that includes both the children and the man's partner in an effort to facilitate reconciliation.
• C. The nurse should document the children's concerns and investigate the truth of their claims.
• D. The nurse should ask the partner to demonstrate that she is not a negative influence on the resident.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: In this scenario, the nurse should respect the father's perspective and accept that the relationship with his common-law partner may indeed be positive and beneficial for him. The nurse's role is to support the patient's autonomy and decisions, especially when there are no legal concerns or signs of abuse. Organizing a family meeting (Choice B) might be premature without first acknowledging the father's viewpoint. Documenting concerns and investigating (Choice C) may create unnecessary conflict and breach the father's trust. Asking the partner to prove herself (Choice D) could strain the relationship further and is not within the nurse's role unless there are clear signs of harm or abuse.

5. A nurse has been providing care for a 69-year-old female client who has recently had her right foot amputated as a result of a chronic diabetic foot ulcer. The nurse undertook to perform debridement of the wound despite her lack of relevant education and experience. The client experienced permanent nerve damage as a result of the nurse's misguided efforts. Which category of legal liability is most likely relevant in this case?

• A. Larceny
• B. Assault
• C. Invasion of privacy
• D. Negligence

Correct answer: D

Rationale: In this case, the most likely relevant category of legal liability is negligence. Negligence involves the commission of an improper act, as exemplified by the nurse's actions of performing a procedure without the necessary education and experience, leading to permanent nerve damage for the client. Larceny refers to theft, assault involves a deliberate threat to harm, and invasion of privacy pertains to the violation of a person's right to privacy. Therefore, in this scenario, the nurse's actions align more closely with negligence.

Similar Questions