Nursing Elites

1. Nurse R works on the geriatric medicine unit of the university hospital and provides care for numerous older adult clients nearing the end of life, many of whom have no-code orders. Which of the following situations is incompatible with the legal requirements for a no-code order?

• A. A client who is mentally competent has declared his wish to have a no-code order despite the availability of treatment options for his condition.
• B. A client has expressed her desire to have a no-code order but her daughter is adamantly opposed to it.
• C. A client clearly tells the nurse her desire to have a no-code order, which the nurse documents at the bedside.
• D. A client has been in a coma and the family has decided to put in place a no-code order.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C. No-code orders require a written and signed order by a physician. Therefore, a client expressing the desire for a no-code order to a nurse, without a documented physician's order, is incompatible with legal requirements. Choices A and B are not incompatible as competent clients can make their own decisions, regardless of treatment options or family opposition. Choice D is also not incompatible as family decisions can be made on behalf of incompetent clients.

2. Which of the following actions can a nurse safely take without risk of liability?

• A. Questioning a doctor's written orders for medication
• B. Permitting a volunteer to move a patient
• C. Using a blood pressure cuff that is sometimes sticking
• D. Asking a family member to deliver routine medication to a patient's room

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A: Questioning a doctor's written orders for medication. Under the doctrine of respondent superior, nurses can face liability risks for various actions. Permitting volunteers to move patients, using malfunctioning equipment, or tasking unqualified staff can pose liability risks. Questioning medication orders is a responsibility to ensure patient safety. It is crucial for nurses to clarify any doubts or raise concerns about medication orders to prevent potential harm to patients.

3. Why might nurses not be the best choice to obtain informed consent from patients?

• A. Nurses may be tempted to influence the patient's decision in subtle ways.
• B. Nurses may not be able to answer some of the medical questions the patient asks.
• C. A signature obtained by anyone other than a physician will not stand up in court.
• D. Under the law, nurses are only allowed to act as witnesses to informed consent signatures.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: Nurses may not have the medical expertise to answer all the questions that patients may have regarding their treatment, which is a crucial aspect of obtaining informed consent. While nurses should not influence a patient's decision, it is not a major reason why they should not obtain informed consent. Signatures obtained by nurses are legally binding, and although nurses often act as witnesses, there is no legal restriction preventing them from obtaining informed consent itself.

4. A nurse is performing a health history on a client who identifies as Native American/First Nations. Based on familial history and racial disparities, for which health issue should the nurse prepare to monitor in this client?

• A. autoimmune disorders
• B. heart disease
• C. Alzheimer's disease
• D. lung cancer

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B: heart disease. Heart disease is a major health issue among Native American/First Nations populations, along with diabetes, malignant neoplasm, and unintentional injuries, contributing to a decreased lifespan. Autoimmune disorders, Alzheimer's disease, and lung cancer are not the primary health concerns that the nurse should monitor for in this client. By understanding the prevalent health issues in this population, the nurse can provide targeted care and interventions to promote better health outcomes.

5. A nurse has been providing care for a 69-year-old female client who has recently had her right foot amputated as a result of a chronic diabetic foot ulcer. The nurse undertook to perform debridement of the wound despite her lack of relevant education and experience. The client experienced permanent nerve damage as a result of the nurse's misguided efforts. Which category of legal liability is most likely relevant in this case?

• A. Larceny
• B. Assault
• C. Invasion of privacy
• D. Negligence

Correct answer: D

Rationale: In this case, the most likely relevant category of legal liability is negligence. Negligence involves the commission of an improper act, as exemplified by the nurse's actions of performing a procedure without the necessary education and experience, leading to permanent nerve damage for the client. Larceny refers to theft, assault involves a deliberate threat to harm, and invasion of privacy pertains to the violation of a person's right to privacy. Therefore, in this scenario, the nurse's actions align more closely with negligence.

Similar Questions