Nursing Elites

1. A nurse cares for an Asian American client with a fractured femur. During shift report, which statement by the nurse will another nurse challenge?

• A. The client has requested to wait to receive pain medication.
• B. The client does not want family to visit the room.
• C. The client is a recent immigrant to this country.
• D. The client is stoic and will not complain at all.

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The correct answer is D. Stereotyping the client as stoic and unlikely to complain about pain is incorrect and can lead to inadequate pain management. It is essential for the nurse to assess and address the client's pain regardless of cultural background. Choices A, B, and C are not as critical as they respect the client's autonomy, cultural preferences regarding family visits, and provide relevant background information about the client's immigrant status.

2. An older adult client tells the nurse that blockage of qi in one of the body's meridians is causing severe headaches. The health care provider has diagnosed migraines and has prescribed a triptan drug. Which action would be most appropriate for the nurse to implement?

• A. Suggest that the prescribed medicine may stimulate the flow of qi
• B. Explain the vasoconstrictive and serotonin-moderating action of triptan
• C. Instruct the client to take as many doses as needed for relief
• D. Caution the client that the headaches will grow worse if the client fails to take the medication

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Qi is the life force that circulates through the body in invisible pathways called meridians. In this scenario, the client believes that the blockage of qi is causing severe headaches. While explaining the scientific principles underlying the drug action could be valuable, it's crucial to consider the client's belief system. Therefore, the most appropriate response is to suggest that the prescribed medicine may stimulate the flow of qi, aligning with the client's perspective. Choice B, explaining the vasoconstrictive and serotonin-moderating action of triptan, does not address the client's concerns about qi blockage. Choice C, instructing the client to take as many doses as needed, can lead to potential medication misuse. Choice D, cautioning the client about worsening headaches without medication, may induce fear and hinder effective communication with the client.

3. Nurse M obtains a signature on an informed consent form from Mr. Y, who is later shown to have a fluctuating level of mental competency. In this case, what is Nurse M's most likely legal position?

• A. Freedom from liability because Mr. Y signed the form
• B. Possibly liable for a violation of Mr. Y's rights
• C. Liable unless a malpractice insurance policy is in effect
• D. Not liable because no family member had a durable power of attorney

Correct answer: B

Rationale: An informed consent may be considered invalid if the patient does not fully understand what he or she is signing. Patients with a fluctuating level of mental function are incapable of granting legally sound consent. Nurse M could be held liable for a violation of Mr. Y's rights as he did not have the capacity to provide informed consent. The presence of an insurance policy and the legal status of family members are irrelevant in this context and do not absolve Nurse M of potential liability.

4. An investigation into reports of substandard care on the subacute geriatric unit of a hospital has been undertaken. Which of the following events is representative of malpractice on the part of the nursing staff?

• A. A client with a documented history of seizures was left with his bed raised and with bedrails not in place, resulting in a fall and head injury
• B. A client was sent for a colonoscopy, after which it was learned that the client had never given written consent for the procedure
• C. A client with a diagnosis of vascular dementia was found wandering in the hall outside the unit
• D. An immobile client was not turned over the course of a night shift and developed a pressure ulcer on her coccyx

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Answer A is correct as it includes all the components of malpractice: duty, negligence, and injury. The nursing staff failed in their duty by leaving a client with a documented history of seizures unattended with bedrails not in place, resulting in a fall and head injury. Answer B involves an issue related to consent, which is the responsibility of the physician, not the nursing staff. Answer C does not demonstrate negligence or harm caused by the nursing staff. Answer D also shows negligence by failing to turn an immobile client, leading to a pressure ulcer, but it lacks a direct connection to the duty of the nursing staff in preventing harm.

5. In which of the following situations would the use of physical restraints most likely be justified?

• A. Mr. Y is agitated and aggressive while experiencing severe alcohol withdrawal and is not responding to chemical sedation.
• B. Mrs. U, diagnosed with dementia, was found wandering outside the hospital, and nurses have been unable to redirect her to stay on the unit.
• C. Mr. I is delirious during the acute stage of his urinary tract infection and is ringing the call bell nearly continuously.
• D. Mrs. T is frequently entering other patients' rooms and attempting to crawl into others' beds.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Answer A is the correct choice because it describes a situation where the client poses a risk due to agitation and aggression during severe alcohol withdrawal, and chemical sedation has not been effective. In such cases, physical restraints may be justified as a last resort to ensure the safety of the client and others. Choices B, C, and D present scenarios where alternative strategies like redirection, addressing delirium, or implementing behavioral interventions should be attempted before considering physical restraints.

Similar Questions