Nursing Elites

1. A nurse has been providing care for a 69-year-old female client who has recently had her right foot amputated as a result of a chronic diabetic foot ulcer. The nurse undertook to perform debridement of the wound despite her lack of relevant education and experience. The client experienced permanent nerve damage as a result of the nurse's misguided efforts. Which category of legal liability is most likely relevant in this case?

• A. Larceny
• B. Assault
• C. Invasion of privacy
• D. Negligence

Correct answer: D

Rationale: In this case, the most likely relevant category of legal liability is negligence. Negligence involves the commission of an improper act, as exemplified by the nurse's actions of performing a procedure without the necessary education and experience, leading to permanent nerve damage for the client. Larceny refers to theft, assault involves a deliberate threat to harm, and invasion of privacy pertains to the violation of a person's right to privacy. Therefore, in this scenario, the nurse's actions align more closely with negligence.

2. How does the doctrine of respondent superior affect nurses?

• A. Liable for injury resulting from advice given to a member of a patient's family
• B. Responsible for double-checking the doses of medication ordered by a physician
• C. Responsible for the actions of the staff they supervise
• D. Obligated to obtain informed consent for any diagnostic procedure

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C. The doctrine of respondent superior holds that supervisors are accountable not only for their own actions but also for the actions of the staff they oversee. This means that nurses, as supervisors, are responsible for ensuring that the actions of their staff comply with established protocols and standards of care. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because they do not directly relate to the principle of respondent superior. Nurses may have other responsibilities related to giving advice, medication administration, and obtaining consent, but the doctrine of respondent superior specifically pertains to the accountability of supervisors for the actions of their subordinates.

3. An elderly man has relied on one of his sons for his care. Now the son has become very involved with a religion other than the one in which he was raised. As a result, he now refuses to help his father. What can a nurse do to help in this family situation?

• A. Set up a family conference that includes the son
• B. Bring in help from other family members or outside
• C. Insist that the son help, along with other family members
• D. Ask the family's own spiritual adviser to intervene

Correct answer: A

Rationale: In this complex family situation, it is essential to approach the issue with sensitivity and understanding. Setting up a family conference that includes the son is the most appropriate action for the nurse to take. While it may seem challenging, there is a possibility that involving the son in a family discussion can help him understand the impact of his actions on his father and the rest of the family. By including him in the conversation, the son may realize the importance of his role in caring for his father. Insisting that the son help, along with other family members, could lead to resistance and further alienation. Asking the family's spiritual adviser to intervene may not be effective if the son is rebelling against the family's religion. If the family conference does not yield positive results, then bringing in help from other family members or an outside caregiver may become necessary to ensure the elderly man receives the care he needs.

4. What is the most important advantage of an advance directive?

• A. Such a directive indicates how medical decisions are to be made in case a patient is unable to communicate their wishes.
• B. It spares the family the burden of making significant decisions for a patient regarding terminal care.
• C. It ensures that a person's property is distributed according to their wishes after death, avoiding legal complications.
• D. It allows individuals to appoint a guardian for themselves in case of incapacity, without involving the court system.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: An advance directive, or living will, is a legal document that specifies an individual's preferences for medical treatment if they are unable to communicate their wishes. The most important advantage of an advance directive is that it spares the family from having to make challenging decisions about terminal care on behalf of the patient. Choice A is incorrect because advance directives pertain to healthcare decisions, not property matters. Choice C is incorrect as it refers to a will for property distribution, which is a different legal document. Choice D is incorrect as advance directives are not related to appointing guardians but rather focus on healthcare decision-making.

5. For which of the following is informed consent required?

• A. Ordering a liquid diet for a post-surgical patient
• B. Listening to a patient reveal his or her private, personal secrets
• C. Giving a patient saline solution to relieve dry nasal passages
• D. Asking a patient to complete a questionnaire for a research study on hospital practices

Correct answer: D

Rationale: Informed consent is required when asking a patient to participate in a research study, as mentioned in choice D. Choices A, B, and C involve routine care measures that do not require specific informed consent. Ordering a liquid diet, providing saline solution for dry nasal passages, or listening to a patient's personal secrets are part of standard care and do not typically necessitate formal consent beyond general consent for treatment.

Similar Questions