Nursing Elites

1. A nurse has been providing care for a 69-year-old female client who has recently had her right foot amputated as a result of a chronic diabetic foot ulcer. The nurse undertook to perform debridement of the wound despite her lack of relevant education and experience. The client experienced permanent nerve damage as a result of the nurse's misguided efforts. Which category of legal liability is most likely relevant in this case?

• A. Larceny
• B. Assault
• C. Invasion of privacy
• D. Negligence

Correct answer: D

Rationale: In this case, the most likely relevant category of legal liability is negligence. Negligence involves the commission of an improper act, as exemplified by the nurse's actions of performing a procedure without the necessary education and experience, leading to permanent nerve damage for the client. Larceny refers to theft, assault involves a deliberate threat to harm, and invasion of privacy pertains to the violation of a person's right to privacy. Therefore, in this scenario, the nurse's actions align more closely with negligence.

2. In which of the following situations would the use of physical restraints most likely be justified?

• A. Mr. Y is agitated and aggressive while experiencing severe alcohol withdrawal and is not responding to chemical sedation.
• B. Mrs. U, diagnosed with dementia, was found wandering outside the hospital, and nurses have been unable to redirect her to stay on the unit.
• C. Mr. I is delirious during the acute stage of his urinary tract infection and is ringing the call bell nearly continuously.
• D. Mrs. T is frequently entering other patients' rooms and attempting to crawl into others' beds.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Answer A is the correct choice because it describes a situation where the client poses a risk due to agitation and aggression during severe alcohol withdrawal, and chemical sedation has not been effective. In such cases, physical restraints may be justified as a last resort to ensure the safety of the client and others. Choices B, C, and D present scenarios where alternative strategies like redirection, addressing delirium, or implementing behavioral interventions should be attempted before considering physical restraints.

3. Following a recent lawsuit that implicated one of their colleagues, the nursing staff at an assisted-living facility are especially aware of the need to safeguard themselves legally. Which of the following measures should the nurses take? Select one that does not apply.

• A. Investigate whether their liability insurance is sufficient
• B. Ensure that work performed by unlicensed care staff under their supervision is adequate
• C. Avoid admitting residents who have living wills or advance directives
• D. Assess the competence of employees under their supervision

Correct answer: C

Rationale: Denying admission to residents with living wills or advance directives is not a legal safeguard measure and may be considered discriminatory. Measures like investigating liability insurance adequacy, ensuring adequate work by unlicensed staff, and assessing employee competence are all valid ways for nurses to protect themselves legally. These measures help in ensuring proper care, reducing risks, and maintaining a high standard of practice.

4. During a busy shift, a registered nurse directed an unlicensed care provider to change the dressing and perform wound care on an older adult client's surgical incision, an act that exists outside of the unlicensed care provider's scope of practice. Which of the following statements best captures the legal context of this event?

• A. The unlicensed care provider is solely responsible for the inappropriate practice.
• B. The nurse can be held liable for the actions of the unlicensed care provider.
• C. Liability rests with the nurse manager of the unit.
• D. In the absence of documented harm to the client, the action is legally permissible.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B. Under the doctrine of respondent superior, nurses can be held liable for the actions of individuals under their supervision. In this scenario, the registered nurse directed the unlicensed care provider to perform a task outside their scope of practice, making the nurse accountable for the consequences. Choice A is incorrect because the responsibility is shared between the nurse and the unlicensed care provider. Choice C is incorrect as the nurse manager may not be directly responsible for the actions of the registered nurse. Choice D is incorrect because legality is not determined solely by the absence of harm; acting within one's legal scope of practice is essential to ensure patient safety.

5. Why might nurses not be the best choice to obtain informed consent from patients?

• A. Nurses may be tempted to influence the patient's decision in subtle ways.
• B. Nurses may not be able to answer some of the medical questions the patient asks.
• C. A signature obtained by anyone other than a physician will not stand up in court.
• D. Under the law, nurses are only allowed to act as witnesses to informed consent signatures.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: Nurses may not have the medical expertise to answer all the questions that patients may have regarding their treatment, which is a crucial aspect of obtaining informed consent. While nurses should not influence a patient's decision, it is not a major reason why they should not obtain informed consent. Signatures obtained by nurses are legally binding, and although nurses often act as witnesses, there is no legal restriction preventing them from obtaining informed consent itself.

Similar Questions