Nursing Elites

1. A nurse has been providing care for a 69-year-old female client who has recently had her right foot amputated as a result of a chronic diabetic foot ulcer. The nurse undertook to perform debridement of the wound despite her lack of relevant education and experience. The client experienced permanent nerve damage as a result of the nurse's misguided efforts. Which category of legal liability is most likely relevant in this case?

• A. Larceny
• B. Assault
• C. Invasion of privacy
• D. Negligence

Correct answer: D

Rationale: In this case, the most likely relevant category of legal liability is negligence. Negligence involves the commission of an improper act, as exemplified by the nurse's actions of performing a procedure without the necessary education and experience, leading to permanent nerve damage for the client. Larceny refers to theft, assault involves a deliberate threat to harm, and invasion of privacy pertains to the violation of a person's right to privacy. Therefore, in this scenario, the nurse's actions align more closely with negligence.

2. How does the doctrine of respondent superior affect nurses?

• A. Liable for injury resulting from advice given to a member of a patient's family
• B. Responsible for double-checking the doses of medication ordered by a physician
• C. Responsible for the actions of the staff they supervise
• D. Obligated to obtain informed consent for any diagnostic procedure

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C. The doctrine of respondent superior holds that supervisors are accountable not only for their own actions but also for the actions of the staff they oversee. This means that nurses, as supervisors, are responsible for ensuring that the actions of their staff comply with established protocols and standards of care. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because they do not directly relate to the principle of respondent superior. Nurses may have other responsibilities related to giving advice, medication administration, and obtaining consent, but the doctrine of respondent superior specifically pertains to the accountability of supervisors for the actions of their subordinates.

3. During a home visit, a nurse notes that an 80-year-old female patient's blood pressure is 166/99 despite the recent introduction of a diuretic to her medication regimen. The patient admits that her son refuses to give her the diuretic because it has precipitated incontinence episodes and states, 'He gets so furious when I soil myself.' What action should the nurse prioritize in this potential case of elder abuse?

• A. Improving or salvaging the family dynamics
• B. Teaching the son why his actions are inappropriate
• C. Initiating legal action
• D. Taking measures to protect the patient's safety

Correct answer: D

Rationale: In this potential case of elder abuse, the nurse's priority should be taking measures to protect the patient's safety. The patient's health and well-being are at risk due to the son's refusal to administer the diuretic, which can lead to serious health complications. While improving family dynamics (choice A), educating the son (choice B), and legal actions (choice C) may be necessary in the long run, the immediate concern is ensuring the patient's safety and well-being.

4. What is the most important advantage of an advance directive?

• A. Such a directive indicates how medical decisions are to be made in case a patient is unable to communicate their wishes.
• B. It spares the family the burden of making significant decisions for a patient regarding terminal care.
• C. It ensures that a person's property is distributed according to their wishes after death, avoiding legal complications.
• D. It allows individuals to appoint a guardian for themselves in case of incapacity, without involving the court system.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: An advance directive, or living will, is a legal document that specifies an individual's preferences for medical treatment if they are unable to communicate their wishes. The most important advantage of an advance directive is that it spares the family from having to make challenging decisions about terminal care on behalf of the patient. Choice A is incorrect because advance directives pertain to healthcare decisions, not property matters. Choice C is incorrect as it refers to a will for property distribution, which is a different legal document. Choice D is incorrect as advance directives are not related to appointing guardians but rather focus on healthcare decision-making.

5. Nurse M obtains a signature on an informed consent form from Mr. Y, who is later shown to have a fluctuating level of mental competency. In this case, what is Nurse M's most likely legal position?

• A. Freedom from liability because Mr. Y signed the form
• B. Possibly liable for a violation of Mr. Y's rights
• C. Liable unless a malpractice insurance policy is in effect
• D. Not liable because no family member had a durable power of attorney

Correct answer: B

Rationale: An informed consent may be considered invalid if the patient does not fully understand what he or she is signing. Patients with a fluctuating level of mental function are incapable of granting legally sound consent. Nurse M could be held liable for a violation of Mr. Y's rights as he did not have the capacity to provide informed consent. The presence of an insurance policy and the legal status of family members are irrelevant in this context and do not absolve Nurse M of potential liability.

Similar Questions