Nursing Elites

1. For which of the following is informed consent required?

• A. Ordering a liquid diet for a post-surgical patient
• B. Listening to a patient reveal his or her private, personal secrets
• C. Giving a patient saline solution to relieve dry nasal passages
• D. Asking a patient to complete a questionnaire for a research study on hospital practices

Correct answer: D

Rationale: Informed consent is required when asking a patient to participate in a research study, as mentioned in choice D. Choices A, B, and C involve routine care measures that do not require specific informed consent. Ordering a liquid diet, providing saline solution for dry nasal passages, or listening to a patient's personal secrets are part of standard care and do not typically necessitate formal consent beyond general consent for treatment.

2. How can the nurse best respond to this situation?

• A. The nurse should accept that the relationship plays a positive role for the man.
• B. The nurse should organize a family meeting that includes both the children and the man's partner in an effort to facilitate reconciliation.
• C. The nurse should document the children's concerns and investigate the truth of their claims.
• D. The nurse should ask the partner to demonstrate that she is not a negative influence on the resident.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: In this scenario, the nurse should respect the father's perspective and accept that the relationship with his common-law partner may indeed be positive and beneficial for him. The nurse's role is to support the patient's autonomy and decisions, especially when there are no legal concerns or signs of abuse. Organizing a family meeting (Choice B) might be premature without first acknowledging the father's viewpoint. Documenting concerns and investigating (Choice C) may create unnecessary conflict and breach the father's trust. Asking the partner to prove herself (Choice D) could strain the relationship further and is not within the nurse's role unless there are clear signs of harm or abuse.

3. Which of the following actions can a nurse safely take without risk of liability?

• A. Questioning a doctor's written orders for medication
• B. Permitting a volunteer to move a patient
• C. Using a blood pressure cuff that is sometimes sticking
• D. Asking a family member to deliver routine medication to a patient's room

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A: Questioning a doctor's written orders for medication. Under the doctrine of respondent superior, nurses can face liability risks for various actions. Permitting volunteers to move patients, using malfunctioning equipment, or tasking unqualified staff can pose liability risks. Questioning medication orders is a responsibility to ensure patient safety. It is crucial for nurses to clarify any doubts or raise concerns about medication orders to prevent potential harm to patients.

4. To minimize liability, what action should nurses take when accepting telephone orders from physicians?

• A. Ask the physician to follow up with a faxed, written order
• B. Clearly communicate the most likely diagnosis to the physician
• C. Have another staff member talk with the physician and audiotape the conversation
• D. Accept only written orders or those communicated orally, in person

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The best action for nurses to take when accepting telephone orders from physicians to minimize liability is to ask the physician to follow up with a faxed, written order and ensure it is signed within 24 hours. This approach helps ensure clarity, accuracy, and documentation of the physician's orders, reducing the risk of misinterpretation or errors. Choices B, C, and D are incorrect. Communicating a diagnosis is outside the nurse's scope of practice and should be done by the physician. Involving another staff member to audiotape the conversation can introduce legal and practical issues. Accepting only written or orally communicated orders in person may not always be practical or feasible in urgent situations where telephone orders are necessary.

5. How does a durable power of attorney differ from a power of attorney?

• A. It is granted by the court on behalf of an incompetent individual.
• B. It stays in effect if the individual granting it becomes incompetent.
• C. It goes into effect only after an individual becomes incompetent.
• D. It includes responsibility for managing an individual's financial assets.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: A durable power of attorney allows competent individuals to appoint someone else to make decisions on their behalf in the event they become incompetent. Choice A is incorrect because a durable power of attorney is typically granted by the individual themselves, not the court. Choice C is incorrect as a durable power of attorney can be effective both before and after incompetency. Choice D is incorrect because managing financial assets is just one aspect of the authority granted by a power of attorney, not specifically for a durable power of attorney.

Similar Questions