Nursing Elites

1. Which of the following is required in order for a healthcare provider to be legally justified in not attempting to save a client's life?

• A. A 'Do Not Resuscitate' (DNR) statement on the patient's care plan
• B. A 'No-Code' sign or symbol placed at the patient's bedside
• C. A 'No-Code' order written and signed on the physician's order sheet
• D. The next of kin's request for 'Do Not Resuscitate' orally or in writing

Correct answer: C

Rationale: To legally justify not attempting to save a client's life, a healthcare provider must have a 'No-Code' order written and signed on the physician's order sheet. Unless there is a specific order stating that resuscitation should not be performed, failure to do so can be considered negligence. A 'Do Not Resuscitate' statement on the care plan or a symbol at the bedside is not legally valid without the proper medical order. Additionally, a request from the next of kin, whether oral or written, is not a substitute for a signed physician's order.

2. A nurse is providing end-of-life care to an older female client who practices Judaism. Which intervention would the nurse identify as potentially problematic for this client and her family?

• A. The client requires transfusions of packed red blood cells during care.
• B. Assessment by a male health care provider was required.
• C. An autopsy was ordered due to the client's unique disease etiology.
• D. A do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order was recommended by the care team.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C. Autopsy is often opposed in the context of Jewish religious and cultural beliefs, as it is seen as desecration of the body. While a person who is a Jehovah's Witness would be opposed to blood transfusions (choice A), a Muslim client may prefer to be cared for by someone of the same gender (choice B). A DNR order (choice D) is not noted to be a particular issue in the context of Jewish culture.

3. Which of the following statements by family caregivers would the nurse consider most indicative of elder abuse?

• A. Mom can't handle her own money anymore, so I've had to take over her banking.
• B. When my dad starts wandering around the house, I give him sleeping pills until he calms down and falls asleep in his chair.
• C. My mother says she wants me to do everything for her, but I think it's better if she keeps on doing everything she's still capable of.
• D. I get so frustrated because my father used to be so competent, and now he can't even use a toilet.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B. The statement 'When my dad starts wandering around the house, I give him sleeping pills until he calms down and falls asleep in his chair' is most indicative of elder abuse as it involves the inappropriate use of chemical restraints. This practice can harm the elderly and is considered a form of abuse. Choices A, C, and D do not demonstrate elder abuse. Choice A may be a responsible action depending on the circumstances, choice C reflects a positive philosophy of care, and choice D expresses frustration but does not constitute abuse.

4. A visiting nurse becomes concerned about a caregiver daughter. Although she does not seem overburdened, she may be drinking too much. The recycling bin contains many wine bottles, and visitors come to the home. What action should the nurse take?

• A. Direct the daughter to a local Alcoholics Anonymous chapter
• B. Ignore the signs unless they interfere with caregiving
• C. Find a new caregiver in the family or outside of it
• D. Assess the daughter's motivation and ability to provide care

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The correct action for the nurse to take in this situation is to assess the daughter's motivation and ability to provide care. The nurse should not jump to conclusions based solely on the presence of wine bottles in the recycling bin. It is important to understand the daughter's overall capacity for caregiving and if her potential alcohol consumption is affecting her ability to provide care. Directing the daughter to Alcoholics Anonymous without a thorough assessment may not be appropriate at this stage. Ignoring the signs or immediately finding a new caregiver without understanding the daughter's situation may not address the underlying issue. Therefore, assessing the daughter's motivation and caregiving capabilities is the most appropriate initial step for the nurse.

5. Nurse M obtains a signature on an informed consent form from Mr. Y, who is later shown to have a fluctuating level of mental competency. In this case, what is Nurse M's most likely legal position?

• A. Freedom from liability because Mr. Y signed the form
• B. Possibly liable for a violation of Mr. Y's rights
• C. Liable unless a malpractice insurance policy is in effect
• D. Not liable because no family member had a durable power of attorney

Correct answer: B

Rationale: An informed consent may be considered invalid if the patient does not fully understand what he or she is signing. Patients with a fluctuating level of mental function are incapable of granting legally sound consent. Nurse M could be held liable for a violation of Mr. Y's rights as he did not have the capacity to provide informed consent. The presence of an insurance policy and the legal status of family members are irrelevant in this context and do not absolve Nurse M of potential liability.

Similar Questions