Nursing Elites

1. Which of the following is required in order for a healthcare provider to be legally justified in not attempting to save a client's life?

• A. A 'Do Not Resuscitate' (DNR) statement on the patient's care plan
• B. A 'No-Code' sign or symbol placed at the patient's bedside
• C. A 'No-Code' order written and signed on the physician's order sheet
• D. The next of kin's request for 'Do Not Resuscitate' orally or in writing

Correct answer: C

Rationale: To legally justify not attempting to save a client's life, a healthcare provider must have a 'No-Code' order written and signed on the physician's order sheet. Unless there is a specific order stating that resuscitation should not be performed, failure to do so can be considered negligence. A 'Do Not Resuscitate' statement on the care plan or a symbol at the bedside is not legally valid without the proper medical order. Additionally, a request from the next of kin, whether oral or written, is not a substitute for a signed physician's order.

2. An investigation into reports of substandard care on the subacute geriatric unit of a hospital has been undertaken. Which of the following events is representative of malpractice on the part of the nursing staff?

• A. A client with a documented history of seizures was left with his bed raised and with bedrails not in place, resulting in a fall and head injury
• B. A client was sent for a colonoscopy, after which it was learned that the client had never given written consent for the procedure
• C. A client with a diagnosis of vascular dementia was found wandering in the hall outside the unit
• D. An immobile client was not turned over the course of a night shift and developed a pressure ulcer on her coccyx

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Answer A is correct as it includes all the components of malpractice: duty, negligence, and injury. The nursing staff failed in their duty by leaving a client with a documented history of seizures unattended with bedrails not in place, resulting in a fall and head injury. Answer B involves an issue related to consent, which is the responsibility of the physician, not the nursing staff. Answer C does not demonstrate negligence or harm caused by the nursing staff. Answer D also shows negligence by failing to turn an immobile client, leading to a pressure ulcer, but it lacks a direct connection to the duty of the nursing staff in preventing harm.

3. What might a nurse suggest to help the grown children make the most of their limited incomes and time with their parents?

• A. Help them find nearby spots for picnics or other free outings
• B. Refer the family to a more appropriate practitioner
• C. Suggest they take out a second mortgage on the family house
• D. Encourage the entire family to participate in activities at Haven

Correct answer: A

Rationale: A nurse, as a caring worker, may suggest helping the grown children find nearby spots for picnics or other free outings. This suggestion would allow the parents to get out of the facility and enjoy quality time with their children without any financial burden. While the family may also want to participate in activities at the facility, a picnic would provide a change of scenery. Referring the family to a more appropriate practitioner is not relevant to improving the limited incomes and time spent with the parents. Suggesting to take out a second mortgage on the family house could provide temporary financial relief but may not be the most suitable solution for maximizing time spent with the parents.

4. Which of the following aspects of gerontological nursing would be most likely classified under private law?

• A. The regulation of who may call himself or herself a 'nurse'
• B. The contract between an older adult resident of a care facility and the owners of the facility
• C. The legal criteria for declaring an individual mentally incompetent
• D. The criminal consequences for instances of elder abuse

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B because private law deals with relationships between individuals and organizations, such as the contract between an individual and the care facility. Choices A, C, and D are not classified under private law. Choice A pertains to professional regulation and is a matter of public law. Choice C involves legal criteria and decision-making related to mental competence, falling under public law. Choice D concerns criminal consequences, which are also part of public law.

5. Which of the following family interactions would the nurse most likely interpret as being atypical?

• A. Mr. R states that he and his brother always had a cordial, though somewhat distant, relationship but that they are now quite close.
• B. Mrs. D describes being a grandparent as 'having all the benefits of having children without the headaches and responsibilities.'
• C. Mr. and Mrs. N had a tumultuous relationship for decades but now appear more at ease with one another.
• D. Mr. A states that his ideal living situation would be himself and his adult son and daughter all under the same roof.

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The correct answer is D. While marital reconciliation, rekindled relationships with siblings, and satisfaction in the role of grandparent are common phenomena among older adults, it is less common for parents and children to see cohabitation as an ideal situation or first preference. Choices A, B, and C reflect common positive family dynamics experienced by older adults, such as improved relationships with siblings, contentment in the grandparent role, and easing of marital tensions over time. On the other hand, choice D stands out as atypical as it suggests an unconventional living arrangement where adult children live with their parent, which is less commonly preferred by older adults.

Similar Questions