ATI TEAS 7
ATI TEAS 7 Reading Practice Test
1. Which statement from the passage best supports the conclusion that taking notes and recording audio during an interview is a good practice for journalists?
- A. Journalists often use a recording device to capture the audio transcript of an interview with a subject.
- B. Relying on a recording device is not without troubles, however.
- C. As a result, a portion of an interview can be lost without any way to reclaim it.
- D. This dual-note method means that most of the time, a wise journalist has two good resources to use as he or she writes the article draft.
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The statement about the dual-note method best supports the conclusion that taking notes and recording audio is a good practice. It highlights the advantage of having two resources - notes and audio recordings - which provide comprehensive coverage of the interview. Choice A simply mentions the use of a recording device but does not emphasize the benefits of combining it with note-taking. Choices B and C focus on the limitations or potential issues with using recording devices, which do not promote the practice as positively as Choice D.
2. Which option best exemplifies an author's use of alliteration and personification?
- A. Her mood hung about her like a weary cape, very dull from wear.
- B. It shuddered, swayed, shook, and screamed its way into dust under hot flames.
- C. The house was a starch sentry, warning visitors away.
- D. At its shoreline, visitors swore they heard the siren call of the cliffs above.
Correct answer: B
Rationale: Choice B best exemplifies an author's use of alliteration and personification. The sentence 'It shuddered, swayed, shook, and screamed its way into dust under hot flames' personifies an inanimate object (it) by attributing human actions to it, combining alliteration with the repeated 's' sounds. Choices A, C, and D do not contain both alliteration and personification. Choice A mainly focuses on simile and lacks alliteration. Choice C features personification but lacks alliteration. Choice D includes personification but lacks alliteration as well.
3. Which of the following menu items fulfills her dietary requirements?
- A. Tofu-mushroom-spinach lasagna
- B. Veggie burger on a whole-grain bun
- C. Salmon with cream sauce
- D. Stuffed baked potato with vegetable soup
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is A, the tofu-mushroom-spinach lasagna. Mirella is an ovo-lacto vegetarian, meaning she eats eggs and dairy but avoids animal flesh. This dish meets her dietary requirements as it is a vegetarian option that contains tofu and cheese for protein. Additionally, since Mirella has a wheat allergy, she can choose a lasagna recipe with alternative noodles or omit noodles altogether. Choice B, the veggie burger, may contain wheat in the bun, which is not suitable for Mirella. Choice C, salmon with cream sauce, contains animal flesh and is not vegetarian. Choice D, stuffed baked potato with vegetable soup, may include wheat products in the soup, making it unsuitable for Mirella's wheat allergy.
4. What can the reader conclude from the passage above?
- A. The kingsnake is dangerous to humans.
- B. The coral snake and the kingsnake are both hunted by the same predators.
- C. It's safe to handle snakes in the woods because you can easily tell whether they're poisonous.
- D. The kingsnake changes its markings when hawks or eagles are close by.
Correct answer: B
Rationale: The correct answer is B. The passage explains that the kingsnake mimics the venomous coral snake's markings to deter predators, particularly hawks and eagles, which cannot differentiate between the two species. This implies that both the coral snake and the kingsnake face similar threats from predators in their shared habitat. Choice A is incorrect because the passage clearly states that the kingsnake is nonvenomous, so it is not dangerous to humans. Choice C is incorrect as the passage highlights that not all snakes with flashy markings are venomous, emphasizing the need for caution. Choice D is incorrect as there is no mention of the kingsnake changing its markings in response to the presence of hawks or eagles in the passage.
5. Which of the following statements offers a supporting argument for the passage's claim that many coastal islands are eroding?
- A. Recent hurricane seasons have been expensive.
- B. The Atlantic Basin is entering an active period.
- C. Louisiana has lost 2,000 square miles of coastal land.
- D. Barrier islands are the first line of defense against coastal storms.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: Statement C directly provides evidence of coastal land erosion by stating that Louisiana has lost a significant amount of coastal land area. This supports the passage's claim that many coastal islands are eroding. Choice A is incorrect because the expense of recent hurricane seasons does not directly relate to coastal land erosion. Choice B is incorrect as the active period of the Atlantic Basin does not specifically address coastal land erosion. Choice D, while related to coastal storms, does not directly support the claim that many coastal islands are eroding.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$150/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$99/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access