ATI TEAS 7
ATI TEAS 7 Reading Practice Test
1. Which statement from the passage best supports the conclusion that taking notes and recording audio during an interview is a good practice for journalists?
- A. Journalists often use a recording device to capture the audio transcript of an interview with a subject.
- B. Relying on a recording device is not without troubles, however.
- C. As a result, a portion of an interview can be lost without any way to reclaim it.
- D. This dual-note method means that most of the time, a wise journalist has two good resources to use as he or she writes the article draft.
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The statement about the dual-note method best supports the conclusion that taking notes and recording audio is a good practice. It highlights the advantage of having two resources - notes and audio recordings - which provide comprehensive coverage of the interview. Choice A simply mentions the use of a recording device but does not emphasize the benefits of combining it with note-taking. Choices B and C focus on the limitations or potential issues with using recording devices, which do not promote the practice as positively as Choice D.
2. What is one point on which the scientist and politician agree?
- A. Burning fossil fuels causes global temperatures to rise.
- B. Global temperatures are increasing.
- C. Countries must revisit their energy policies before it's too late.
- D. Earth's climate naturally goes through warming and cooling periods.
Correct answer: B
Rationale: The correct answer is B: 'Global temperatures are increasing.' The scientist and politician both agree on this point based on the context provided. Choice A is incorrect because while it might be a common belief among scientists, the politician's agreement is not explicitly mentioned. Choice C is incorrect as it suggests a course of action rather than a point of agreement. Choice D is incorrect as it contradicts the consensus that global temperatures are currently increasing due to human activities, not just natural climate cycles.
3. According to the advertisement, which of the following is true?
- A. Candidates must have three or more years of litigation experience
- B. Candidates will have small caseloads
- C. Candidates must be members of the California State Bar Association
- D. The position is not currently available
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The correct answer is C. This information is based on the advertisement's specific requirement that candidates must be members of the California Bar Association. The job description clearly states, 'Candidates must be members in Good Standing of the California Bar Association.' This indicates that a valid license to practice law in California is a mandatory qualification for the position advertised. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because there is no mention in the advertisement of candidates needing three or more years of litigation experience, having small caseloads, or the position not being currently available.
4. How does the author organize the passage?
- A. heading and subheadings
- B. superscripts
- C. diagrams
- D. labels and footnotes
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The author uses heading and subheadings to organize the passage. Each subheading focuses on either dairy (e.g., beverages, meals, snacks, dessert) or non-dairy options for obtaining more calcium from food. This organizational structure makes it easier for readers to identify and understand the different categories of tips provided within the text. Choices B, C, and D are incorrect because superscripts, diagrams, labels, and footnotes are not used as organizational features in the passage; instead, headings and subheadings play a key role in structuring the information.
5. Which of the following is an opinion, rather than a historical fact, expressed by the author?
- A. Leif Erikson was definitely the son of Erik the Red.
- B. Leif Erikson's crew called the land Vinland.
- C. Leif Erikson deserves more credit for his accomplishments.
- D. Leif Erikson explored the Americas nearly five hundred years before Columbus.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The statement 'Leif Erikson deserves more credit for his accomplishments' is an opinion rather than a historical fact. Historical facts can be verified through evidence and documentation, while opinions are subjective viewpoints. Choices A, B, and D provide historical facts about Leif Erikson's lineage, the name given to the land he discovered, and his exploration, respectively, which can be supported by historical records and research.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$150/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$99/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access