ATI TEAS 7
TEAS 7 Reading Practice Test
1. How did Araminta Ross come to be known as Harriet Tubman?
- A. She changed her name to her husband's last name and her first name to her mother's name.
- B. She was named after the plantation owner's wife.
- C. She changed her name because she was wanted as an Underground Railroad runner.
- D. She changed her name to remain anonymous as a Civil War spy.
Correct answer: A
Rationale: Araminta Ross came to be known as Harriet Tubman after marrying a free black man named John Tubman. She took her husband's last name 'Tubman' and changed her first name to 'Harriet,' which was her mother's name. This change of name was a personal choice after her marriage and not because she was named after the plantation owner's wife (B), wanted as an Underground Railroad runner (C), or to remain anonymous as a Civil War spy (D). Therefore, the correct answer is A.
2. Which of the following labels best describes the previous passage?
- A. comparison essay
- B. definition essay
- C. cause and effect essay
- D. persuasive essay
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The passage delves into the relationship between magnesium intake and health outcomes, highlighting how deficiencies in magnesium can lead to various health issues. It discusses how different factors, such as gastrointestinal disorders or dietary habits, can cause magnesium depletion and its subsequent effects on the body. This focus on exploring the cause-and-effect connections between magnesium levels and health conditions aligns with the characteristics of a cause and effect essay, making choice C the most appropriate. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because the passage does not focus on comparing different concepts, providing definitions, or persuading the reader of a particular viewpoint.
3. What is implied by the following sentence? It is hoped the wounds may not be mortal. My apprehension is that they will prove fatal.
- A. Those involved are hopeful for a positive outcome.
- B. There is no hope that Seward or Lincoln will recover from their wounds.
- C. The writer is pessimistic about whether Seward will recover from his wounds.
- D. The writer is doubtful about the legitimacy of accounts regarding the night's events.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The sentence 'My apprehension is that they will prove fatal' indicates that the writer is pessimistic about Seward's recovery from his wounds. This implies a lack of hope or certainty about the outcome, suggesting a negative view on the situation. Choice A is incorrect because the sentence does not refer to all involved parties being hopeful. Choice B is incorrect as it is too extreme, stating there is no hope for recovery. Choice D is incorrect as there is no indication in the sentence that the writer doubts the legitimacy of the accounts.
4. When evaluating the credibility of research sources, which of the following is a valid consideration?
- A. It is credible if published in a peer-reviewed scholarly journal.
- B. It is never credible if it is a source published online.
- C. It is not necessarily more credible based on author affiliations.
- D. The number of times a source is cited does not affect its credibility.
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is A. It is credible if published in a peer-reviewed scholarly journal because peer review ensures that the research has been evaluated by experts in the field for quality and accuracy before publication. This process enhances the credibility of the research source. Choice B is incorrect because not all online sources are unreliable; credibility depends on various factors beyond the publication medium. Choice C is incorrect because author affiliations can indeed impact credibility, but they are not the sole determinant. Choice D is incorrect as the frequency of citations can indicate the impact of a source but does not guarantee its credibility.
5. What is the best summary of this article?
- A. The assassin who tried to kill President Lincoln and Secretary Seward escaped into the night. After having fired his pistol at the president, he barely eluded authorities and hurried to Seward's residence. There, he stabbed both the secretary and his son, Frederick Seward.
- B. A single assassin went on a rampage tonight, starting at Ford's Theater and absconding into the night. He currently remains at large.
- C. President Lincoln was shot by an assassin at Ford's Theater; the president is not expected to survive. Secretary Seward and his son were also attacked by an assassin at their home this evening. They remain unconscious, and their chances of survival are questionable. General Grant was scheduled to be at the theater, but changed his plans and was not harmed by the evening's events.
- D. General Grant is poised to take over the role of the presidency should President Lincoln die from wounds inflicted upon him at Ford's Theater. Grant was present at a recent Cabinet meeting, where Lincoln expressed hope for the future and spoke kind words about General Lee and the Confederacy.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: Choice C is the best summary of the article. It encapsulates the key events that occurred, including President Lincoln being shot at Ford's Theater, the attack on Secretary Seward and his son at their home, and General Grant avoiding harm. It accurately reflects the major developments and outcomes of the tragic events described in the article. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because they either focus on specific aspects of the events and omit critical details or introduce irrelevant information not present in the article extract.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$149.99/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$99/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access