when students use inference what are they able to do

ATI TEAS 7

TEAS Reading Practice Test

1. When students use inference, what are they able to do?

A. Make logical assumptions based on contextual clues
B. Independently navigate various types of text
C. Summarize a text's main idea
D. Paraphrase a text's main idea

Correct answer: A

Rationale: When students use inference, they are able to make logical assumptions based on contextual clues found in the text. This involves reading between the lines and drawing conclusions that are not explicitly stated. Choice B is incorrect because it refers to the skill of navigating through different types of text independently, which is not specifically related to inference. Choices C and D are also incorrect as they refer to summarizing and paraphrasing a text's main idea, which are different skills from making inferences.

2. Which of the following would be an effective primary source to support Vivian Harris' argument?

A. A study showing that fewer students are bullied at schools that require uniforms
B. An article describing the negative effects of uniforms in American schools
C. An interview with a local principal who regrets implementing uniform requirements
D. A persuasive essay written by Vivian that includes statistics and quotes from psychological studies and other students that support her position

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The correct answer is D. A persuasive essay written by Vivian directly supports her argument with relevant statistics and quotes, aligning with her stance against uniforms. Choices A, B, and C do not provide direct support for Vivian's argument. Choice A discusses the positive aspect of uniforms in reducing bullying, which contradicts Vivian's viewpoint. Choice B describes negative effects of uniforms, but it does not directly support Vivian's argument against uniforms. Choice C, an interview with a principal regretting uniform requirements, does not offer direct backing for Vivian's stance either.

3. What can the reader conclude from the passage above?

A. The kingsnake is dangerous to humans.
B. The coral snake and the kingsnake are both hunted by the same predators.
C. It's safe to handle snakes in the woods because you can easily tell whether they're poisonous.
D. The kingsnake changes its markings when hawks or eagles are close by.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B. The passage explains that the kingsnake mimics the venomous coral snake's markings to deter predators, particularly hawks and eagles, which cannot differentiate between the two species. This implies that both the coral snake and the kingsnake face similar threats from predators in their shared habitat. Choice A is incorrect because the passage clearly states that the kingsnake is nonvenomous, so it is not dangerous to humans. Choice C is incorrect as the passage highlights that not all snakes with flashy markings are venomous, emphasizing the need for caution. Choice D is incorrect as there is no mention of the kingsnake changing its markings in response to the presence of hawks or eagles in the passage.

4. According to the passages, which situation would not constitute an illegal use of lethal force?

A. A disgruntled cashier yells obscenities at a customer.
B. A thief is seen running away with stolen cash.
C. A man is attacked in an alley by another man with a knife.
D. A woman punches another woman in a bar.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C because, according to the passage, lethal force may be legally used in self-defense or to protect others from imminent danger. In the situation where a man is attacked in an alley by another man with a knife, the use of lethal force to defend oneself would not constitute an illegal act. Choices A, B, and D do not involve a situation where the use of lethal force in self-defense would be justified, making them incorrect. A disgruntled cashier yelling obscenities, a thief running away with stolen cash, and a woman punching another woman do not present imminent danger that would justify the use of lethal force.

5. Which of the following statements would make the best conclusion to an essay about civil rights activist Rosa Parks?

A. Rosa Parks refused to give up her bus seat, leading to her arrest.
B. Rosa Parks was a hero to many, symbolizing the power of ordinary people in bringing about change.
C. Rosa Parks died in 2005 at the age of 92.
D. Rosa Parks' actions sparked the Montgomery Bus Boycott, a pivotal event in the Civil Rights Movement.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The best conclusion to an essay about civil rights activist Rosa Parks should reflect her significance and impact. Choice A, while true, focuses on a specific event rather than summarizing her broader influence. Choice C, though factual, is not a strong conclusion as it does not capture the essence of her legacy. Choice D, although related to her actions, is not as encompassing as Choice B. Option B is the most suitable conclusion as it highlights Rosa Parks' heroism, emphasizing how she inspired change and symbolized the power of ordinary individuals in making a difference.