ATI TEAS 7
TEAS Test Reading Questions
1. What is the author’s conclusion about the house on Pine Street?
- A. The house did not have enough bedrooms.
- B. The house did not have a big enough yard.
- C. The house was not in the right neighborhood.
- D. The house was too expensive.
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The author's conclusion about the house on Pine Street is that it was too expensive. This can be inferred from the description provided in the text, where it is mentioned that although the house had enough space inside, it didn't have a big enough yard for their dogs, and the cost of the house was well above their price range. Therefore, the correct answer is D. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect as they do not align with the evidence from the text, which clearly points to the cost being the main issue with the house on Pine Street.
2. What is the best summary of this passage?
- A. Humans can use coloration and markings on snakes to determine whether they’re venomous.
- B. Animals use coloration to hide from predators.
- C. The scarlet kingsnake and the coral snake have nearly identical markings.
- D. Venomous snakes often have bright markings, although nonvenomous snakes can also mimic those colors.
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The best summary of the passage is that humans can use coloration and markings on snakes to determine whether they're venomous. The passage discusses how snake markings serve the purpose of warning predators and helping humans identify venomous snakes by their bright coloration. Choice B is incorrect because the passage focuses on how coloration helps snakes evade predators rather than hide from them. Choice C is incorrect as it only mentions two specific snakes with similar markings, which is a minor detail compared to the main point of identifying venomous snakes. Choice D is incorrect because it only partially reflects the passage, focusing solely on the relationship between markings and venom in snakes, missing the crucial aspect of human ability to discern venomous snakes based on their coloration.
3. What is the meaning of testament as used in the sentence provided?
- A. story
- B. surprise
- C. artifact
- D. evidence
Correct answer: D
Rationale: In the context provided, the word 'testament' most likely refers to evidence. A testament can be something that serves as proof or confirmation of a fact or situation. In this case, it is used in a non-religious sense to indicate evidence or proof. The other choices are incorrect as 'story' does not fit the context, 'surprise' is not related to the owners' skills mentioned, and 'artifact' does not align with the discussion of the restaurant's success.
4. Which of the following statements based on the passage should be considered an opinion?
- A. Julia’s boss asked her to help one of her coworkers with work.
- B. Julia was late to work due to traffic.
- C. It was irresponsible for Julia to leave work early.
- D. Julia was tired because she’d been woken up early.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The statement 'It was irresponsible for Julia to leave work early' is an opinion because it reflects a judgment or evaluation of Julia's actions, rather than stating a fact. The other statements (A, B, D) provide factual information about events that occurred in the passage. Option A states a fact about Julia being asked by her boss; option B explains the reason for Julia being late; option D provides a reason for Julia feeling tired. These are not opinions but rather statements of events or circumstances.
5. Which of the following would weaken the author's argument?
- A. a report revealing that the cited study was funded by a company that provides discounted tutoring through schools
- B. a study demonstrating differences in standardized test scores among students at schools in various neighborhoods
- C. a statement signed by local teachers affirming that they do not give preferential treatment in the classroom or during grading
- D. a study indicating that GPA has a weak correlation with success in college
Correct answer: A
Rationale: Choice A weakens the author's argument by highlighting a potential conflict of interest. If the cited study was funded by a company offering discounted tutoring, it could introduce bias and question the credibility of the study's findings. This revelation could cast doubt on the objectivity and reliability of the research, ultimately undermining the argument based on the cited study. Choices B, C, and D do not directly impact the credibility or objectivity of the cited study, so they would not significantly weaken the author's argument.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$149.99/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$1/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access