which of the following would be the most helpful advice for the student

ATI TEAS 7

ATI TEAS Reading

1. What would be the most helpful advice for the student starting a research assignment on Japanese-American internment camps during World War II?

A. Conduct a broad internet search to get a wide view of the subject.
B. Consult an American history textbook.
C. Find websites about Japanese culture such as fashion and politics.
D. Locate texts in the library related to World War II in America and look for references to internment camps in the index.

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The best advice for the student would be to locate texts in the library related to World War II in America and look for references to internment camps. This choice is the most appropriate as it focuses on accessing specific and credible sources directly related to the research topic. Choices A and C are too broad and may not provide in-depth information on the internment camps. Choice B, while related to American history, may not offer the specific details needed for the research assignment on Japanese-American internment camps during World War II.

2. According to the food chain diagram, which of the following animals has no natural predators?

A. Vulture
B. Cobra
C. Mongoose
D. Aardvark

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B, Cobra. In the food chain diagram, cobras are often considered apex predators, meaning they are at the top of the food chain and do not have natural predators. Vultures (choice A), although scavengers, may face competition but not direct predators. Mongooses (choice C) are known for preying on snakes, including cobras, and aardvarks (choice D) are part of the food chain and have predators like lions and hyenas.

3. Which of the following lists Julia’s actions in the correct sequence?

A. Julia woke up early and found she didn’t have any regular coffee. When she got to work, her boss had a lot for her to do. When the fire alarm went off, she decided to go home.
B. Julia got to work and decided she was too tired to do the work her boss asked for, so she went home to get a cup of coffee.
C. Julia woke up when the fire alarm went off and couldn’t get back to sleep. She then got stuck in traffic and arrived at work thirty minutes late.
D. Julia was woken up early by a lawnmower and then got stuck in traffic on the way to her office. Once there, she found that the office was out of coffee and she had a lot of work to do. When the fire alarm went off, she decided to go home.

Correct answer: D

Rationale: Option D provides a sequence of events that align with the extract provided. Julia was woken up early by a lawnmower, couldn't go back to sleep, discovered she was out of regular coffee, got stuck in traffic on the way to work, found the office was out of coffee, had a lot of work to do, and decided to go home when the fire alarm went off. This sequence accurately reflects the chronological order of Julia's actions throughout the day. Choices A, B, and C do not follow a logical sequence of events based on the extract, making them incorrect.

4. Due to his many interests and pursuits, Eratosthenes dabbled in a variety of fields, and he is credited with a theory known as the sieve of Eratosthenes. This is an early algorithm used to determine prime numbers. To which section of the library should Jorgen go to find out more about the current applications of the sieve of Eratosthenes?

A. 0
B. 100
C. 400
D. 500

Correct answer: D

Rationale: Jorgen should go to the 500 section of the library, which is dedicated to science and mathematics. The sieve of Eratosthenes is a mathematical concept, so current applications and research related to it would be found in this section. Choice A (0) is incorrect as it is for general works. Choice B (100) is for philosophy and psychology, which are unrelated to mathematics. Choice C (400) is for languages, not mathematics.

5. Which of the following supports evaluating a logical argument?

A. Unbiased information
B. Generalizations
C. Emotional statements
D. Anecdotes

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Unbiased information is crucial for assessing the validity and soundness of an argument. It helps in making informed judgments based on facts rather than personal opinions or biases. Choice B, generalizations, can oversimplify complex issues and lack specific evidence, making them unreliable for evaluating logical arguments. Emotional statements (Choice C) can cloud judgment and introduce subjective elements that may not be logically relevant. Anecdotes (Choice D) are specific instances that may not represent the overall truth or validity of an argument, making them less reliable for logical evaluation.