Nursing Elites

1. Which of the following statements represents an EXAGGERATED claim in support of the argument presented in the passage?

• A. In the United States, the foreign language requirement for high school graduation is decided at the state level.
• B. Studying a foreign language has become increasingly important for the global economy.
• C. High school graduates with foreign language credits have been shown to have an increased college acceptance rate.
• D. Students who did not study a foreign language often find themselves unable to obtain a job at all.

Correct answer: D

Rationale: While it is true that studying a foreign language can enhance one's job prospects and competitiveness in the job market, claiming that students who did not study a foreign language often find themselves unable to obtain a job at all is an exaggerated statement. Many factors contribute to employability, and while language skills can be advantageous, they are not the sole determining factor in securing employment.

2. The word 'cation' is closest in meaning to:

• A. element
• B. nutrient similar to magnesium
• C. symptom of deficiency
• D. nutritional supplement

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The word 'cation' refers to a positively charged ion, which is an atom or molecule that has lost one or more electrons. It is not related to nutrients, symptoms, or supplements. Therefore, the closest in meaning to 'cation' among the given choices is 'element.' In the provided extract, it mentions that cations like magnesium can affect the body's ability to absorb other cations, including calcium and potassium. This further emphasizes that 'cation' is related to elements rather than nutrients, symptoms, or supplements.

3. Which of the following best describes the author's intent in the passage?

• A. to persuade
• B. to entertain
• C. to express feelings
• D. to inform

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The author's intent in the passage is to inform the reader about the historical events surrounding King James II, his family, and the succession of the English throne. The passage provides a detailed account of the lineage, religious affiliations, and the political implications of James II and his descendants. It does not aim to persuade, entertain, or express feelings, but rather presents a factual narrative of historical events. Therefore, choice D, 'to inform,' is the correct answer. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect because the passage is focused on presenting historical information rather than persuading, entertaining, or expressing emotions.

4. Which one of the following statements might be accurately inferred based on the above passage?

• A. The famous children's author produced a lesser-quality book under her pseudonym.
• B. The famous children's author has expertise in Antebellum America.
• C. The famous children's author did not receive adequate publicity for her historical novel.
• D. Historical fiction novels are more popular than children's series.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C. The passage mentions that the author published a historical fiction novel under a pseudonym, which received critical acclaim but did not sell as well as her children's books. This indicates that the author did not receive adequate publicity for her historical novel, as it did not reach the same level of popularity as her children's books. Choices A and B are incorrect as there is no mention of the quality of the book produced under the pseudonym or the author's expertise in Antebellum America. Choice D is also incorrect as the passage does not compare the overall popularity of historical fiction novels to children's series.

5. What is the main idea of the second paragraph?

• A. One hairy monkey proves the hypothesis 'All monkeys are hairy.'
• B. The same piece of evidence can both confirm and disconfirm a hypothesis.
• C. Confirming and disconfirming evidence affect hypotheses differently.
• D. The scientific method is not a failsafe method for arriving at objective truth.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The main idea of the second paragraph is that confirming and disconfirming evidence can affect hypotheses differently, as stated in the passage - 'Single pieces of evidence then, seem to affect a given hypothesis in radically different ways.' Choice A is incorrect because the paragraph discusses how single pieces of evidence affect hypotheses, not that one hairy monkey proves a hypothesis. Choice B is incorrect as the paragraph focuses on the different effects of evidence on hypotheses, rather than its ability to confirm and disconfirm simultaneously. Choice D is incorrect as the paragraph does not primarily discuss the scientific method's failings but rather the impact of evidence on hypotheses.

Similar Questions