Nursing Elites

1. What is the best summary of the instructor's motive in sending the email to the students?

• A. Expressing concern about students' grades and emphasizing the importance of being worried.
• B. Recognizing the low exam scores and the need to adjust the grading plan to help students improve.
• C. Explaining the purpose of a group project and how it benefits students working together.
• D. Stating the strict grading policy set at the beginning of the semester.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: Answer choice B is the correct summary of the instructor's motive in sending the email to the students. The passage mentions that the instructor acknowledged the low exam scores, including a high failure rate and the need to reconsider the grading plan for the semester. This indicates that the instructor wants to adjust the grading plan to provide students with an opportunity to improve their scores. Choice A is incorrect as it focuses on expressing concern rather than on adjusting the grading plan. Choice C is unrelated as it discusses the purpose of a group project. Choice D is also incorrect as it mentions the strict grading policy set at the beginning of the semester, which is not the main focus of the email sent by the instructor.

2. Sarah also wants to offer her vegan guests a slightly more filling option such as a light soup with some biscuits. Which two chapters of the cookbook should she consult?

• A. Chapter II and Chapter III
• B. Chapter I and Chapter III
• C. Chapter II and Chapter IV
• D. Chapter V and Chapter VI

Correct answer: C

Rationale: Sarah wants to offer her vegan guests a slightly more filling option such as a light soup with some biscuits. Chapter II of the cookbook covers light soups, making it a suitable choice for soup ideas. Chapter IV focuses on baking and bread recipes, including biscuits. By consulting Chapter II for soup recipes and Chapter IV for biscuit recipes, Sarah can find appropriate dishes for her vegan guests. Choice A (Chapter II and Chapter III) is incorrect because Chapter III does not cover biscuits. Choice B (Chapter I and Chapter III) is incorrect as biscuits are not part of Chapter I. Choice D (Chapter V and Chapter VI) is incorrect because these chapters do not contain relevant recipes for a light soup with biscuits.

3. Which of the above options is most likely the best choice for Regina, considering her dairy allergy?

• A. Cream of potato soup
• B. Lentil soup
• C. Broccoli cheese soup
• D. Cream of tomato soup

Correct answer: B

Rationale: Given Regina's severe allergy to dairy products, the best choice for her would be Lentil soup. This option does not contain any dairy and is a nutritious choice that provides a good balance of protein, fiber, and other essential nutrients. It is a hearty and filling option that can help keep Regina satisfied and energized. Additionally, lentils are known for their health benefits, including promoting heart health and digestion. Choices A, C, and D are less suitable for Regina as they contain dairy or are not as nutritious as lentil soup.

4. Which word is most closely synonymous with the word 'patronage' as it appears in the following statement? '...that I am sure he will need no charitable aid or condescending patronage.'

• A. Auspices
• B. Aberration
• C. Acerbic
• D. Adulation

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is 'Auspices.' 'Auspices' is closely related to 'patronage' in the sense of support or sponsorship. In the context of the excerpt, it conveys the idea that the working man will not require condescending support or sponsorship but will actively participate and contribute to the Institute. The other choices are incorrect: 'Aberration' means a deviation from the norm, 'Acerbic' means sharp or bitter in tone, and 'Adulation' means excessive admiration or praise, none of which align with the meaning of 'patronage' in this context.

5. Which of the following is not a reliable resource for a research paper?

• A. The New York Times
• B. A personal interview with a politician
• C. A medical journal
• D. Wikipedia

Correct answer: D

Rationale: Wikipedia is not a reliable source for a research paper due to its open editing format, which may lead to inaccuracies, bias, and lack of authority. While it can be a good starting point for research and general information, it is crucial to verify information from Wikipedia with more academic and reputable sources like peer-reviewed journals, books, or official websites. The New York Times, a personal interview with a politician, and a medical journal are generally considered reliable sources for research papers. The New York Times is a reputable newspaper, personal interviews can provide valuable firsthand insights, and medical journals undergo rigorous peer review processes to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Similar Questions