ATI TEAS 7
TEAS Test Reading Questions
1. Based on the context, which of the following is the meaning of the word move in the passage?
- A. drive
- B. sell
- C. advance forward
- D. change location
Correct answer: B
Rationale: In the context provided, the word 'move' is used to indicate that the vehicles are 'marked to move quickly,' which implies that they are intended to be sold rapidly. Therefore, the correct meaning of 'move' in this context is 'sell.' Options A, C, and D do not accurately capture the intention of the word as it is used in the passage. While 'advance forward' (Option C) might seem plausible, the context of a sales event and the urgency to buy due to low prices indicate that 'sell' is the most fitting interpretation.
2. Which of the following would be an effective primary source to support Vivian Harris' argument?
- A. A study showing that fewer students are bullied at schools that require uniforms
- B. An article describing the negative effects of uniforms in American schools
- C. An interview with a local principal who regrets implementing uniform requirements
- D. A persuasive essay written by Vivian that includes statistics and quotes from psychological studies and other students that support her position
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer is D. A persuasive essay written by Vivian directly supports her argument with relevant statistics and quotes, aligning with her stance against uniforms. Choices A, B, and C do not provide direct support for Vivian's argument. Choice A discusses the positive aspect of uniforms in reducing bullying, which contradicts Vivian's viewpoint. Choice B describes negative effects of uniforms, but it does not directly support Vivian's argument against uniforms. Choice C, an interview with a principal regretting uniform requirements, does not offer direct backing for Vivian's stance either.
3. Which of the following most accurately describes the author's main conclusion?
- A. Leif Erikson is a legendary Viking explorer.
- B. Leif Erikson deserves more credit for exploring America.
- C. Spreading Christianity motivated Leif's expeditions.
- D. Leif Erikson contacted the natives nearly five hundred years before Columbus.
Correct answer: B
Rationale: The correct answer is B: 'Leif Erikson deserves more credit for exploring America.' The author's main conclusion, as supported by the extract, is that Leif Erikson should receive more credit for his contributions in exploring the New World. Choice A is incorrect as it does not capture the essence of the author's conclusion, which is about recognizing Erikson's achievements rather than just labeling him as a legendary explorer. Choice C is incorrect because while Leif Erikson did convert to Christianity, the primary focus of the conclusion is on his exploration rather than his motivations. Choice D is incorrect as it only mentions one aspect of Erikson's achievements (contacting the natives) and does not encompass the broader idea of giving him more credit for his explorations.
4. Even without Franz Ferdinand's assassination ... Which of the following most logically completes the passage?
- A. A war between the world powers was extremely likely.
- B. World War I never would have happened.
- C. England, France, and Russia would have started the war.
- D. Austria would have started the war.
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is A. Given the alliances and tensions at the time, the assassination was simply the trigger in an already volatile situation, making war highly likely. Choice B is incorrect because the alliances and existing tensions would likely have led to a conflict even without the assassination. Choice C is incorrect as it wrongly implies that only these three countries were involved in the conflict. Choice D is incorrect as Austria alone starting the war doesn't consider the broader context of alliances and power dynamics among the world powers.
5. In a lesson on mass media, a teacher is showing commercials and analyzing their hidden messages. Which of the following is an example of a commercial that claims professional authority not supported by evidence?
- A. A commercial selling pain relief featuring a professional basketball player who says he uses the product
- B. A commercial for cold medicine narrated by a man in a doctor's coat
- C. A commercial for a new toy showing footage of children playing happily with it
- D. A commercial for a prepared food with testimonials by real consumers
Correct answer: B
Rationale: The commercial for cold medicine narrated by a man in a doctor's coat is the correct answer. This commercial claims professional authority without providing any evidence of the narrator's credentials. While the man may appear to be a doctor with his coat, there is no proof that he is actually a medical professional or that the product is recommended by experts. This lack of evidence can mislead consumers by giving the product an air of legitimacy and credibility without factual support. Choices A, C, and D do not fit the criteria as they involve a professional athlete endorsing a product, children enjoying a toy, and real consumers providing testimonials respectively.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$149.99/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$49/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access