ATI TEAS 7
TEAS Practice Test Math
1. Which of the following is the correct simplification of the expression below? 12 ÷ 3 × 4 - 1 + 23
- A. 6
- B. 21
- C. 38
- D. 23
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The correct order of operations dictates solving division and multiplication before addition and subtraction. Therefore, following the order: (12 ÷ 3) × 4 - 1 + 23 = 4 × 4 - 1 + 23 = 16 - 1 + 23 = 38. Choice A (6) results from adding and subtracting before division and multiplication. Choice B (21) results from incorrect placement of parentheses. Choice D (23) is the last number in the expression and does not reflect the cumulative result of the operations.
2. Which of the following weights is equivalent to 3.193 kilograms?
- A. 3,193,000 grams
- B. 3,193 grams
- C. 319.3 grams
- D. 0.003193 grams
Correct answer: B
Rationale: To convert kilograms to grams, you need to remember that 1 kilogram is equal to 1,000 grams. Therefore, 3.193 kilograms is equivalent to 3,193 grams (3.193 kg * 1,000 g/kg = 3,193 g). Choice A (3,193,000 grams) incorrectly converts kilograms to milligrams, Choice C (319.3 grams) incorrectly moves the decimal point one place to the right, and Choice D (0.003193 grams) incorrectly converts kilograms to milligrams and then further to grams.
3. A homeowner has hired two people to mow his lawn. If person A is able to mow the lawn in 2 hours by herself and person B is able to mow the lawn in 3 hours by himself, what is the amount of time it would take for both person A and B to mow the lawn together?
- A. 5 hours
- B. 2.5 hours
- C. 1.2 hours
- D. 1 hour
Correct answer: C
Rationale: To find the combined work rate, you add the individual work rates: 1/2 + 1/3 = 5/6. This means that together, they can mow 5/6 of the lawn per hour. To determine how long it would take for both A and B to mow the entire lawn, you take the reciprocal of 5/6, which gives you 6/5 or 1.2 hours. Therefore, it would take 1.2 hours for person A and person B to mow the lawn together. Choice A (5 hours) is incorrect because it does not consider the combined efficiency of both workers. Choice B (2.5 hours) is incorrect as it does not reflect the correct calculation based on the combined work rates of the two individuals. Choice D (1 hour) is incorrect as it doesn't consider the fact that the combined rate is less than the individual rate of person A alone, thus taking longer than 1 hour.
4. If a box of 55 syringes costs $660.00, what is the cost of four syringes?
- A. $51.00
- B. $26.00
- C. $32.00
- D. $48.00
Correct answer: D
Rationale: To find the cost of one syringe, divide the total cost by the number of syringes: $660.00 ÷ 55 = $12. Therefore, the cost of four syringes is 4 x $12 = $48. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect because they do not correctly calculate the cost per syringe or the total cost of four syringes.
5. What is the probability of consecutively pulling two more orange blocks, without replacement, from a bag containing 3 orange blocks, 5 green blocks, and 4 purple blocks?
- A. 3/12
- B. 3/55
- C. 2/10
- D. 1/3
Correct answer: B
Rationale: To calculate the probability of consecutively pulling two more orange blocks without replacement, we first determine the probability of pulling an orange block on the first draw, which is 3/12 (3 orange blocks out of 12 total blocks). After removing one orange block, there are only 11 blocks left, so the probability of pulling another orange block on the second draw is 2/11. To find the combined probability, we multiply the probabilities together: (3/12) * (2/11) = 6/132 = 3/55. Therefore, the correct answer is B. Choice A (3/12) incorrectly simplifies the probability before calculating the second draw. Choice C (2/10) does not consider the specific number of orange blocks in the bag. Choice D (1/3) does not account for the reduced number of blocks after the first draw.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$150/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$99/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access