Nursing Elites

1. Which of the following is listed in order from least to greatest? (-3/4, -7 4/5, -8, 18%, 0.25, 2.5)

• A. -3/4, -7 4/5, -8, 18%, 0.25, 2.5
• B. -8, -7 4/5, -3/4, 18%, 0.25, 2.5
• C. 18%, 0.25, -3/4, 2.5, -7 4/5, -8
• D. -8, -7 4/5, -3/4, 18%, 0.25, 2.5

Correct answer: D

Rationale: To arrange the numbers from least to greatest, we first compare the integers, then the fractions, and finally the percentages and decimals. The correct order is -8, -7 4/5, -3/4, 18%, 0.25, 2.5. Choice A is incorrect because it incorrectly orders the fractions. Choice B is incorrect because it incorrectly places -8 after the fractions. Choice C is incorrect because it starts with the percentages instead of the integers, leading to an incorrect order.

2. Dr. Lee observed that 30% of all his patients developed an infection after taking a certain antibiotic. He further noticed that 5% of that 30% required hospitalization to recover from the infection. What percentage of Dr. Lee's patients were hospitalized after taking the antibiotic?

• A. 1.50%
• B. 5%
• C. 15%
• D. 30%

Correct answer: A

Rationale: To find the percentage of Dr. Lee's patients hospitalized after taking the antibiotic, we need to calculate 30% of 5%. First, convert 30% and 5% to decimals: 30% = 0.30 and 5% = 0.05. Multiply 0.30 by 0.05 to get 0.015. To convert 0.015 to a percentage, multiply by 100, resulting in 1.5%. Therefore, only 1.50% of Dr. Lee's patients were hospitalized after taking the antibiotic. Choice A is correct. Choice B (5%) is incorrect as it represents the percentage of patients who developed an infection and not those hospitalized. Choices C (15%) and D (30%) are also incorrect percentages as they do not accurately reflect the proportion of hospitalized patients in this scenario.

3. A scientist is trying to determine how much poison will kill a rat the fastest. Which of the following statements is an example of an appropriate hypothesis?

• A. Rats that are given lots of poison seem to die quickly.
• B. Does the amount of poison affect how quickly the rat dies?
• C. The more poison a rat is given, the quicker it will die.
• D. Poison is fatal to rats.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: A valid hypothesis must be a testable statement that predicts a relationship between variables. Option C is the only statement that presents a clear cause-and-effect relationship between the amount of poison given and the time it takes for the rat to die. Option A is descriptive without predicting an outcome, option B is a question rather than a statement, and option D is a general fact about poison and rats, lacking a specific hypothesis for testing.

4. As part of a study, a set of patients will be divided into three groups. 4/15 of the patients will be in Group Alpha, 2/5 in Group Beta, and 1/3 in Group Gamma. Order the groups from smallest to largest, according to the number of patients in each group.

• A. Group Alpha, Group Beta, Group Gamma
• B. Group Alpha, Group Gamma, Group Beta
• C. Group Gamma, Group Alpha, Group Beta
• D. Group Alpha, Group Beta, Group Gamma

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct order is Group Alpha, Group Gamma, Group Beta based on the common denominators of the fractions. To determine the order from smallest to largest, compare the fractions' numerators since the denominators are different. Group Alpha has 4/15 patients, Group Gamma has 1/3 patients, and Group Beta has 2/5 patients. Comparing the fractions' numerators, the order from smallest to largest is Group Alpha (4), Group Gamma (1), and Group Beta (2). Therefore, the correct order is Group Alpha, Group Gamma, Group Beta. Choice A is incorrect as it lists Group Beta before Group Gamma. Choice C is incorrect as it lists Group Gamma before Group Alpha. Choice D is incorrect as it lists Group Beta before Group Gamma, which is not in ascending order based on the number of patients.

5. A homeowner has hired two people to mow his lawn. If person A is able to mow the lawn in 2 hours by herself and person B is able to mow the lawn in 3 hours by himself, what is the amount of time it would take for both person A and B to mow the lawn together?

• A. 5 hours
• B. 2.5 hours
• C. 1.2 hours
• D. 1 hour

Correct answer: C

Rationale: To find the combined work rate, you add the individual work rates: 1/2 + 1/3 = 5/6. This means that together, they can mow 5/6 of the lawn per hour. To determine how long it would take for both A and B to mow the entire lawn, you take the reciprocal of 5/6, which gives you 6/5 or 1.2 hours. Therefore, it would take 1.2 hours for person A and person B to mow the lawn together. Choice A (5 hours) is incorrect because it does not consider the combined efficiency of both workers. Choice B (2.5 hours) is incorrect as it does not reflect the correct calculation based on the combined work rates of the two individuals. Choice D (1 hour) is incorrect as it doesn't consider the fact that the combined rate is less than the individual rate of person A alone, thus taking longer than 1 hour.

Similar Questions