ATI TEAS 7
TEAS Reading Practice Questions
1. Which of the following can the reader infer about the author's point of view when they state: 'the work Lamarr and Antheil did creating this frequency-hopping system led to many technologies that are often taken for granted today?'
- A. The author believes that we have underestimated the value of the contributions of lesser-known inventors
- B. The author believes that the frequency-hopping system has damaged the potential of modern electronics
- C. The author believes that the work of Lamarr and Antheil was instrumental to victory in World War II
- D. The author believes we spend too much time using technologies derived from...
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The author highlights the significance of the contributions made by lesser-known inventors like Lamarr and Antheil.
2. Which of the following most accurately describes the author's main conclusion?
- A. Leif Erikson is a legendary Viking explorer.
- B. Leif Erikson deserves more credit for exploring America.
- C. Spreading Christianity motivated Leif's expeditions.
- D. Leif Erikson contacted the natives nearly five hundred years before Columbus.
Correct answer: B
Rationale: The correct answer is B: 'Leif Erikson deserves more credit for exploring America.' The author's main conclusion, as supported by the extract, is that Leif Erikson should receive more credit for his contributions in exploring the New World. Choice A is incorrect as it does not capture the essence of the author's conclusion, which is about recognizing Erikson's achievements rather than just labeling him as a legendary explorer. Choice C is incorrect because while Leif Erikson did convert to Christianity, the primary focus of the conclusion is on his exploration rather than his motivations. Choice D is incorrect as it only mentions one aspect of Erikson's achievements (contacting the natives) and does not encompass the broader idea of giving him more credit for his explorations.
3. With which of the following statements would the author most likely agree?
- A. There is no real mystery about the Bermuda Triangle because most events have reasonable explanations.
- B. Researchers are wrong to expand the focus of the Triangle to the Azores, as this increases the likelihood of accidents.
- C. The official statement of 'causes or reasons unknown' in the loss of the Navy planes was a deliberate concealment from the Navy.
- D. Reducing the legends about the mysteries of the Bermuda Triangle will help to reduce the number of reported accidents or shipping losses in the region.
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The author would most likely agree with the statement that reducing the legends about the mysteries of the Bermuda Triangle will help to reduce the number of reported accidents or shipping losses in the region. This aligns with the perspective that many events in the Bermuda Triangle can be explained logically and that dispelling myths and legends can lead to a more accurate understanding of the phenomena occurring in the area. Choice A is incorrect because the author acknowledges that the Bermuda Triangle has sparked interest due to unexplained events. Choice B is incorrect as expanding the focus of the Triangle to the Azores is not associated with an increase in accidents, according to the author. Choice C is incorrect as the author does not suggest a deliberate concealment but rather points towards logical explanations for the events in the Bermuda Triangle.
4. Which of the following statements could NOT provide support for BOTH arguments?
- A. A number of local school districts have recently implemented dress codes.
- B. School administrators have been in talks with parents over the issue of uniforms.
- C. Students have reported that school uniforms are costly and typically ill-fitting.
- D. Several groups of students have been organized to discuss uniform dress codes.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The correct answer is C because the statement about the cost and fit of uniforms could only support the argument against uniforms, not both arguments. It aligns more with Vivian Harris's stance against uniforms, emphasizing the importance of clothing as a form of self-expression. Choices A, B, and D are more neutral statements that could provide support for both arguments by indicating actions being taken or discussions being held regarding uniforms without leaning towards a specific stance.
5. From the passage, which of the following statements represents a logical conclusion about the author?
- A. The author loves to attend theatrical productions
- B. The author prefers musical comedies
- C. The author also enjoys concerts and movies
- D. The author finds theater seating comfortable
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is A. The passage does not provide any information about the author's preference for musical comedies (choice B), enjoyment of concerts and movies (choice C), or comfort with theater seating (choice D). However, the passage does mention cicadas and their emergence, not providing any details that connect to the author's preferences. Therefore, the only logical conclusion that can be drawn about the author is that they love attending theatrical productions, as suggested by the deep love for attending theater productions.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$149.99/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$99/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access