Nursing Elites

1. Which of the following are the products of anaerobic respiration in humans?

• A. Ethyl alcohol and CO2
• B. Ethyl alcohol only
• C. Lactic acid and CO2
• D. Lactic acid only

Correct answer: C

Rationale: During anaerobic respiration in humans, lactic acid and CO2 are produced. Choice A, 'Ethyl alcohol and CO2,' is incorrect because ethyl alcohol is not a product of anaerobic respiration in humans. Choice B, 'Ethyl alcohol only,' is incorrect as ethyl alcohol is not a product of anaerobic respiration in humans. Choice D, 'Lactic acid only,' is incorrect because CO2 is also a product of anaerobic respiration in humans.

2. Which of the following structures in the skin is responsible for producing sweat?

• A. Sebaceous gland
• B. Sudoriferous gland
• C. Hair follicle
• D. Melanocyte

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B: Sudoriferous gland. Sudoriferous glands, also known as sweat glands, are responsible for producing sweat to regulate body temperature. Sebaceous glands produce sebum (oil) to lubricate the skin and hair. Hair follicles are associated with hair growth, not sweat production. Melanocytes are responsible for producing melanin for skin pigmentation, not sweat.

3. A researcher is studying the response of bacteria to a certain chemical. In three experiments, the bacteria swim towards the chemical, and in one experiment, the bacteria swim away from it. What would be the most appropriate next step for the researcher?

• A. Report only the first three experiments.
• B. Report all the experiments, but refrain from making any conclusions.
• C. Repeat the experiment several more times and apply a statistical analysis to the data.
• D. Repeat the experiment, adding a new chemical to determine its effect on the bacteria.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: Repeating the experiment multiple times and applying statistical analysis would help ensure the results are reliable. By doing so, the researcher can validate the observed trends and determine the significance of the bacteria's response to the chemical. This approach would enhance the credibility of the findings and allow for more robust conclusions to be drawn. Reporting only the first three experiments (Choice A) would overlook critical data that could provide a comprehensive understanding of the bacteria's response. Refraining from making any conclusions (Choice B) would not utilize the available data effectively. Adding a new chemical in a repeated experiment (Choice D) would deviate from focusing on analyzing the response to the original chemical, introducing unnecessary variables.

4. What is the primary function of the heart?

• A. Filtering blood
• B. Exchanging gases
• C. Pumping blood throughout the body
• D. Producing hormones

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The main function of the heart is to pump blood throughout the body. The heart acts as a muscular pump that circulates blood, delivering oxygen and nutrients to the body's tissues and removing waste products. Option A is incorrect because blood filtration is a function of the kidneys, not the heart. Option B is incorrect as gas exchange occurs in the lungs, not the heart. Option D is also incorrect as hormone production is mainly carried out by endocrine glands, not the heart.

5. When a certain plant is introduced into an area, and the population of a certain insect species declines, what can be concluded from this?

• A. The plant is toxic to the insect in question.
• B. The plant competes with and drives out plants that the insect feeds on.
• C. The insect population was declining anyway; the fact that it happened when the plant was introduced is a coincidence.
• D. All of these explanations may be possible; further investigation is necessary to determine which is true.

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The given scenario presents multiple possible explanations for the decline in the insect population with the introduction of a particular plant. It could be due to the plant being toxic to the insect (Option A), competing with and driving out plants that the insect feeds on (Option B), or the decline could be coincidental with the plant introduction as the insect population was already decreasing (Option C). Without further investigation and evidence, it is not possible to definitively determine which explanation is correct. Therefore, all of these possibilities may be true, and thorough investigation is necessary to reach a conclusive conclusion.

Similar Questions