how is this passage structured

ATI TEAS 7

TEAS 7 Reading Practice Test

1. How is this passage structured?

A. cause and effect
B. problem and solution
C. chronological order
D. compare and contrast

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The passage is structured in chronological order as it presents events in the order in which they occurred. It starts with Harriet Tubman's background as a slave, then progresses through her marriage, escape, and subsequent actions to help other slaves. Each event is presented in a time sequence, making it clear that the passage follows a timeline of events. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because the passage does not focus on demonstrating cause and effect relationships, outlining problems and solutions, or comparing and contrasting different elements. Instead, it provides a historical account of Harriet Tubman's life in a sequential manner.

2. What word best describes the author's attitude toward those who believe they understand money?

A. Supportive
B. Incriminating
C. Excessive
D. Patronizing

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The author's tone towards those who think they understand money is patronizing, as seen in the statement 'Many of my hearers may say, 'we understand this; this is economy, and we know economy is wealth; we know we can't eat our cake and keep it also.' Yet I beg to say that perhaps more cases of failure arise from mistakes on this point than almost any other.' This conveys a sense of superiority and belittlement, making 'Patronizing' the best word to describe the author's attitude. - Choice A, 'Supportive,' is incorrect as the author is not expressing support but rather a critical view. - Choice B, 'Incriminating,' is incorrect as the author is not accusing or blaming those who believe they understand money. - Choice C, 'Excessive,' is incorrect as it does not capture the author's attitude of looking down on others' understanding of money.

3. Based on the information in the passage, which of the composers among The Five would the author likely agree was the most influential?

A. Alexander Glazunov
B. Modest Mussorgsky
C. Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov
D. Cesar Cui

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C: Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov. The passage highlights Rimsky-Korsakov's significant influence by mentioning that composers such as Alexander Glazunov, Sergei Prokofiev, and Igor Stravinsky studied under him. This demonstrates that Rimsky-Korsakov had a lasting impact on the development of these renowned composers. Choice A, Alexander Glazunov, is incorrect because the passage states that Glazunov studied under Rimsky-Korsakov, indicating he was influenced by him rather than being the most influential among The Five. Choice B, Modest Mussorgsky, is incorrect as the passage mainly focuses on his works and contributions but does not mention his influence on other composers. Choice D, Cesar Cui, is incorrect as he is considered one of the founders of the movement but is not highlighted for influencing other significant composers as Rimsky-Korsakov is. Therefore, based on the information provided, the author would likely agree that Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov was the most influential among The Five.

4. Which word is most closely synonymous with the word 'patronage' as it appears in the following statement? '...that I am sure he will need no charitable aid or condescending patronage.'

A. Auspices
B. Aberration
C. Acerbic
D. Adulation

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is 'Auspices.' 'Auspices' is closely related to 'patronage' in the sense of support or sponsorship. In the context of the excerpt, it conveys the idea that the working man will not require condescending support or sponsorship but will actively participate and contribute to the Institute. The other choices are incorrect: 'Aberration' means a deviation from the norm, 'Acerbic' means sharp or bitter in tone, and 'Adulation' means excessive admiration or praise, none of which align with the meaning of 'patronage' in this context.

5. Which of the following is not a reliable resource for a research paper?

A. The New York Times
B. A personal interview with a politician
C. A medical journal
D. Wikipedia

Correct answer: D

Rationale: Wikipedia is not a reliable source for a research paper due to its open editing format, which may lead to inaccuracies, bias, and lack of authority. While it can be a good starting point for research and general information, it is crucial to verify information from Wikipedia with more academic and reputable sources like peer-reviewed journals, books, or official websites. The New York Times, a personal interview with a politician, and a medical journal are generally considered reliable sources for research papers. The New York Times is a reputable newspaper, personal interviews can provide valuable firsthand insights, and medical journals undergo rigorous peer review processes to ensure accuracy and reliability.