ATI TEAS 7
TEAS Reading Questions
1. Based on the information provided within the passage, which of the following can be inferred about King James II's son?
- A. Considering his resemblance to King James II, the young James was likely the legitimate child of the king and the queen.
- B. Given the queen's previous inability to produce a healthy child, there were suspicions about the prince's legitimacy by the English and the Lowland Scots.
- C. James 'the Pretender' was not as popular among the Highland clans as his son Bonnie Prince Charlie.
- D. James was unable to acquire the resources needed to build the army and plan the invasion that his son succeeded in doing.
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The passage describes that the young James bore a strong resemblance to King James II, suggesting that he was likely the legitimate child of the king and the queen. This resemblance supports the inference that the young James was indeed their offspring. Choice B is incorrect because although there were suspicions about the prince's legitimacy, the passage does not mention these suspicions being based on the queen's previous inability to produce a healthy child. Choice C is incorrect as the passage does not compare the popularity of James 'the Pretender' among the Highland clans to his son Bonnie Prince Charlie. Choice D is also incorrect as the passage does not mention James's inability to acquire resources for building an army or planning an invasion.
2. Which of the following perspectives can be inferred from the passage?
- A. Cicadas and public interest in cicadas are cyclical.
- B. Cicadas and public interest in cicadas are global.
- C. Cicadas and public interest in cicadas are inspirational.
- D. Cicadas and public interest in cicadas are inapplicable.
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is A. The passage provided talks about the cyclical nature of going to the theatre and how it transports individuals into different stories. There is no mention of global aspects, inspirational qualities, or inapplicability related to cicadas and public interest in cicadas. Therefore, choices B, C, and D are incorrect as they are not supported by the passage.
3. Based on the author's support and evidence, which of the following is a valid evaluation of the paragraph?
- A. It is an entertaining piece based on personal opinion.
- B. It is part of a historical account of the Great Emu War in Australia.
- C. It is a detailed analysis of military strategies during the Great Emu War.
- D. It is a scientific report on the impact of emus on the Australian ecosystem.
Correct answer: B
Rationale: The paragraph provides a historical account of the Great Emu War in Australia, outlining the events, dates, and outcomes of the conflict between the Australian government and the emu population. It does not focus on personal opinion, military strategies, or the scientific impact of emus, making choice B the most accurate evaluation. Choices A, C, and D are incorrect as they do not align with the content of the paragraph.
4. What does the following sentence most nearly mean? 'The preparatory instars of such insects are aquatic; the adult instar is aerial.'
- A. The volume of water is necessary for preparing the insect for transition rather than the volume of the air.
- B. The insect's body is shaped like a star in both water and air.
- C. The stage of preparation between molting occurs in water, while the final stage happens in the air.
- D. These insects first breathe in water through gills and then continue to use the same organs to breathe in the air.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The sentence indicates that the insects undergo different stages of development, with the preparatory instars being aquatic and the adult instar being aerial. This highlights the adaptability of these insects to different environments. Choice A is incorrect as it focuses on the volume of water and air rather than the stages of development in different environments. Choice B is unrelated to the content of the sentence and does not capture the meaning accurately. Choice D is incorrect as it specifically mentions breathing through gills, which is not explicitly stated in the sentence. Therefore, choice C is the best interpretation of the sentence.
5. Which of the following is an opinion, rather than a historical fact, expressed by the author?
- A. Leif Erikson was definitely the son of Erik the Red.
- B. Leif Erikson's crew called the land Vinland.
- C. Leif Erikson deserves more credit for his accomplishments.
- D. Leif Erikson explored the Americas nearly five hundred years before Columbus.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The statement 'Leif Erikson deserves more credit for his accomplishments' is an opinion rather than a historical fact. Historical facts can be verified through evidence and documentation, while opinions are subjective viewpoints. Choices A, B, and D provide historical facts about Leif Erikson's lineage, the name given to the land he discovered, and his exploration, respectively, which can be supported by historical records and research.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$149.99/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$99/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access