Nursing Elites

1. Which of the following should the writer consult for more detailed information about the Bermuda Triangle?

• A. An encyclopedia entry about the Bermuda Triangle
• B. Travel journal entries from a ship captain who sailed the area frequently
• C. A brochure for a resort located in the Bermuda Triangle
• D. A biography of someone who disappeared in the Bermuda Triangle

Correct answer: A

Rationale: An encyclopedia would provide detailed and reliable information on the Bermuda Triangle, including its history and theories. This source is preferred over the other choices because it is likely to offer a comprehensive overview of the subject, covering various aspects such as geographical features, historical incidents, scientific explanations, and debunking myths. Travel journal entries may offer personal experiences but lack the breadth and depth of information provided in an encyclopedia entry. A brochure for a resort located in the Bermuda Triangle would focus on promoting the resort rather than providing factual information about the area. A biography of someone who disappeared in the Bermuda Triangle would be specific to that individual's story and not offer a general overview of the Bermuda Triangle.

2. Which of the following can be logically inferred from the passage?

• A. The Vikings disliked exploring the New World.
• B. Leif Erikson's banishment led to his exploration of Canada.
• C. Leif Erikson never shared his stories with the King of Norway.
• D. Historians have difficulty pinpointing events in Viking history.

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The correct answer is D. It can be inferred from the passage that historians have difficulty definitively pinpointing Viking historical events. The passage highlights the uncertainty around Leif Erikson's birth year, conflicting accounts of interactions with natives, and the lack of clarity regarding specific events in Viking history. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect. There is no indication in the passage that the Vikings disliked exploring the New World; Leif Erikson's banishment did not directly lead to his exploration of Canada but rather his desire to spread Christianity and find new lands; and there is no mention of Leif Erikson not sharing his stories with the King of Norway.

3. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the explanation proposed by the author in Passage I, third paragraph?

• A. An instance of lethal force in self-defense is not absolutely absolved from blame. The law takes into account the necessary use of force at the time it is committed.
• B. An individual who uses necessary defense under lethal force is in direct compliance with the law under most circumstances.
• C. Lethal force in self-defense should not be forgiven in all cases for the peace of mind of the primary victim.
• D. The use of lethal force is not evaluated based on the intent of the user, but rather the severity of the primary attack that warranted self-defense.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A because the author in Passage I discusses the concept of lethal force in self-defense being justified and absolved from blame when used as a last resort to prevent severe harm or death. Choice A undermines this by stating that an instance of lethal force in self-defense is not absolutely absolved from blame and highlights that the law considers the necessary use of force at the time it is committed. This challenges the absolute justification of such actions and would seriously undermine the author's argument. Choice B is incorrect because compliance with the law does not necessarily address the justification and absolution of lethal force. Choice C is incorrect as forgiving lethal force in all cases is not the focus of the author's argument. Choice D is incorrect because the intent of the user is a crucial factor in evaluating the use of lethal force, contrary to what is stated.

4. Which phrase best describes the purpose of nonfiction writing?

• A. To inform, entertain, or persuade readers
• B. To entertain, then to inform
• C. To convince readers they're wrong about the author's subject
• D. None of the above

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A: 'To inform, entertain, or persuade readers.' Nonfiction writing aims to provide factual information (inform), engage the audience (entertain), or influence their opinions (persuade). Choice B is incorrect because informing usually takes precedence over entertaining in nonfiction. Choice C is incorrect as the primary goal is not to convince readers they're wrong but rather to present information or arguments. Choice D is incorrect as there are clear purposes for nonfiction writing.

5. What is the new word?

• A. REVEST
• B. REVERT
• C. REVIEW
• D. REVERSE

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The new word can be formed by following the transformation steps: Remove the P, Replace the first A with the final E, Remove the I, Remove the C, and Remove the A from PREVARICATE, resulting in the word 'REVERT.' Choices A, C, and D do not match the rearrangement of letters provided in the instructions.

Similar Questions