ATI TEAS 7
TEAS Reading Questions
1. In a volleyball game, who can score a point?
- A. the receiving team
- B. the serving team
- C. any team
- D. neither team
Correct answer: B
Rationale: According to the passage, only the serving team can score in a volleyball game. After the ball is served, the serving team earns points by winning a rally. The receiving team aims to stop the serving team and win the rally to gain the serve. Therefore, the correct answer is the serving team. Choices A, C, and D are incorrect as the receiving team does not score points, both teams do not score, and there is indeed scoring in volleyball.
2. Which choice correctly matches these samples with incompletely met criteria?
- A. Sample 1's evidence is not sufficient; sample 2's evidence is not relevant; sample 3's evidence is not factual.
- B. Sample 1's evidence is not factual; sample 2's evidence is not sufficient; sample 3's evidence is not relevant.
- C. Sample 1's evidence is not relevant; sample 2's evidence is not factual; sample 3's evidence is not sufficient.
- D. The evidence of samples 1 and 3 is insufficient; sample 2's evidence is factual but irrelevant.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: Choice C correctly matches the samples with incompletely met criteria. It states that sample 1's evidence is not relevant, sample 2's evidence is not factual, and sample 3's evidence is not sufficient. This aligns with the criteria mentioned, indicating a lack of relevance, factual accuracy, and sufficiency in each sample, respectively. Choices A, B, and D do not accurately match the samples with the given criteria, making them incorrect. In choice A, while sample 1's evidence is not sufficient, sample 2's evidence is not relevant, and sample 3's evidence is not factual, the order in which these aspects are mentioned is not aligned with the criteria provided. Choice B has the correct order but mismatches the criteria with the samples. Choice D incorrectly assesses the evidence of the samples, focusing on sufficiency and relevance but not aligning with the specified criteria for each sample.
3. Which of the following statements least supports the argument that the American economy is healthy?
- A. The United States' Gross Domestic Product (GDP) increased by two percent last year.
- B. Unemployment is the lowest it has been in over a decade due to job creation.
- C. Average household income just hit a historical high point.
- D. The output of the United States' manufacturing sector decreased.
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer is D because a decrease in the manufacturing sector is usually considered a negative indicator for the economy, as it may suggest a decline in production or demand for goods. Choices A, B, and C all provide positive signs for a healthy economy: an increase in GDP reflects economic growth, low unemployment rates indicate a strong job market, and rising household income signifies improved financial well-being for families.
4. What does the author imply will happen if people do not follow his suggestions?
- A. The author implies we will run out of resources in the next 10 years.
- B. The author implies water and energy prices will rise sharply in the near future.
- C. The author implies global warming and the depletion of natural resources will continue.
- D. The author implies local farmers will lose their farms.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The author implies that neglecting the recommended actions will lead to the continued degradation of the environment and depletion of resources. The passage emphasizes the importance of being proactive in conserving resources to combat global warming and the depletion of natural resources. Choice A is incorrect because the author doesn't specify a timeframe for running out of resources. Choice B is incorrect as the focus is on environmental impact rather than economic consequences. Choice D is incorrect as the passage does not specifically mention the impact on local farmers.
5. Based on the information in the announcement, what might the reader assume about how the university determined the lunch schedule?
- A. The university arranged the schedule based on the department with the most faculty members.
- B. The university checked with the departments to see when the majority of faculty members would be entering the canteen.
- C. The university checked to see when the most faculty members from each department would be entering the canteen.
- D. The university established different times for each department to reduce crowding in the canteen.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The university determined the lunch schedule by considering when the most faculty members from each department usually enter the canteen. This information is provided in the announcement where it states that the schedules were recommended based on when members of each department should visit the canteen for lunch. Choice A is incorrect because the schedule was not arranged solely based on the department with the most faculty members. Choice B is incorrect as it implies checking with departments about the majority of faculty members entering the canteen, which is not explicitly mentioned. Choice D is incorrect as it simplifies the university's decision-making process, which involved considering the timing of faculty members from different departments entering the canteen.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$149.99/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$99/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access