HESI A2
Reading Comprehension HESI A2 Practice Test
1. Which statement would not be inferred by the reader in the passage about MRSA?
- A. Hospitals may soon limit the spread of infection with a new textile.
- B. MRSA begins by infecting the skin.
- C. You are most likely to contract MRSA in a crowded location.
- D. Used clothing stores may harbor MRSA.
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer is D: 'Used clothing stores may harbor MRSA.' This statement is not supported by the passage. The passage mentions the spread of MRSA in hospitals, gyms, locker rooms, swimming pools, and other settings with frequent human contact, but it does not mention used clothing stores as a common location for MRSA. Therefore, it is an unlikely inference. Choice A is supported by the passage as it discusses the development of a new textile to halt the spread of hospital-associated MRSA. Choice B is also supported as the passage mentions MRSA as a skin infection. Choice C is supported by the passage as it states that MRSA has become ubiquitous in settings with frequent human contact.
2. What conclusion can be drawn from the passage on the Amazon Rainforest?
- A. The Amazon Rainforest is shrinking at a rapid pace.
- B. The Amazon Rainforest is not affected by human activity.
- C. The Amazon Rainforest will survive indefinitely.
- D. The Amazon Rainforest has no significant impact on global warming.
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The correct conclusion that can be drawn from the passage on the Amazon Rainforest is that it is shrinking at a rapid pace. The passage explicitly mentions the rapid deforestation and shrinking of the Amazon Rainforest due to human activities like logging and burning. This conclusion is supported by the alarming statistics provided, such as 9,169 square miles of forest being cut down in Brazil in 2003, and an area of rainforest the size of a football field being burned down every minute. This rapid destruction poses a significant threat to the survival of the Amazon Rainforest and its biodiversity. Choice B is incorrect as the passage clearly states that human activities are causing harm to the rainforest. Choice C is incorrect because the passage highlights the current dangers and threats faced by the Amazon Rainforest, indicating that its survival is at risk. Choice D is also incorrect as the passage clearly explains the significant impact of deforestation in the Amazon Rainforest on global warming due to the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
3. Which of the following statements is an opinion related to Barefoot Running?
- A. Running barefoot is natural and advantageous.
- B. The cost of modern running shoes keeps increasing.
- C. Concrete sidewalks are harder than dirt paths.
- D. The arch of the foot gives a spring to the step.
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The statement that "running barefoot is natural and advantageous" reflects a subjective opinion, which cannot be definitively proven or measured objectively. The other statements (B, C, and D) provide factual observations or comparisons that can be validated through evidence, which distinguishes A as the only opinion-based statement.
4. As used in the last sentence of this paragraph, the term 'concomitant' means?
- A. Accompanying
- B. Quiet
- C. Frustrated
- D. Prefer low-pitched tones
Correct answer: A
Rationale: In the provided extract, the term 'concomitant' is used to describe problems associated with alcohol abuse, such as the individual becoming alcoholic, contribution to highway deaths by drunken drivers, and spousal and child abuse. Therefore, in this context, 'concomitant' means accompanying, or going along with something else. The other choices of 'Quiet,' 'Frustrated,' and 'Prefer low-pitched tones' do not align with the meaning of 'concomitant' as used in the paragraph.
5. A reader might infer from this passage that the organization ___________.
- A. succeeded in eradicating malaria
- B. has always been led by a medical doctor
- C. no longer studies communicable diseases
- D. changed its name to match its mission
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The passage never says whether or not the CDC succeeded in its original mission (choice A) or whether it continued to be led by doctors (choice B). Inferring either of those things would be a leap unsupported by the text. Choice C is countered by information in the final
Similar Questions
Access More Features
HESI A2 Basic
$49/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access
HESI A2 Premium
$99/ 90 days
- Actual HESI A2 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access