HESI A2
Reading Comprehension Practice Test HESI A2
1. Which of the following is not listed as a detail in the passage about Concussions?
- A. Football and lacrosse players suffer the most concussions.
- B. More than a million Americans a year suffer concussions.
- C. Concussions may result in diminished alertness.
- D. It may take longer to recover from a second concussion.
Correct answer: A
Rationale: Skim the passage to identify the detail that does not appear. The sports in choice A are never mentioned, so you do not even need to look at the other choices.
2. What is the main idea of the passage about MRSA?
- A. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a significant problem both within and outside of hospitals, and there are ways to mitigate the risk.
- B. A new textile made of nanomaterials could significantly reduce the spread of hospital-associated MRSA infections.
- C. There are multiple strains of MRSA, and they pose various risks beyond just fatality.
- D. MRSA is a significant problem both within and outside of hospitals, but there are ways to mitigate the risk.
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The main idea of the passage is that MRSA is a significant issue both within and outside of hospitals. It highlights the challenges posed by MRSA, including its resistance to antibiotics, high mortality rates, and widespread presence in various settings. While the development of new technologies like nanomaterial textiles shows promise in reducing hospital-associated MRSA, the passage also emphasizes the importance of practicing good hygiene to prevent community-associated MRSA infections. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect because they do not capture the comprehensive overview of MRSA provided in the passage. Choice A encompasses the main idea by emphasizing the significance of MRSA and ways to mitigate the risk. Choice B focuses on a specific solution rather than the broader issue of MRSA. Choice C is incorrect as it oversimplifies the risks associated with MRSA strains by only mentioning fatality.
3. How were white elephants regarded by the people of Siam?
- A. If a village elder received a white elephant, the entire village shared in the supply of meat.
- B. White elephants were highly prized as they were very hard workers in the cane fields.
- C. The people of Siam vied for the honor of receiving the king's gift or a white elephant.
- D. White elephants were a financial burden despite being considered sacred.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The correct answer is C. In the culture of Siam, white elephants were highly regarded as sacred and receiving one as a gift from the king was considered an honor. It was a symbol of prestige and status to receive the king's gift of a white elephant. Option A is incorrect as white elephants were not used for meat supply. Option B is also incorrect as white elephants were not prized for their work but rather for their symbolic value. Option D is partially correct but does not capture the full significance of white elephants in Siam.
4. What conclusion can be drawn about the article?
- A. The author explains differences in eating methods.
- B. Eating habits vary across different cultures.
- C. Space travel has posed challenges for eating habits.
- D. Chopsticks are more suitable than forks for space travel.
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is A. The passage discusses different eating methods in various cultures, focusing on their differences. The author describes the development of cutlery in European cultures, the use of chopsticks in China, and how space travel has influenced eating tools for astronauts. Choice B is incorrect because the passage emphasizes the differences rather than the similarities in eating habits across cultures. Choice C is partially supported by the passage as it mentions that space travel has created new challenges for consuming food, but it is not the main conclusion of the article. Choice D is not directly supported by the passage as it discusses the challenges of using chopsticks and forks in space rather than stating that chopsticks are superior to forks.
5. Why was the roadway so dangerous to build?
- A. There weren't enough materials available to build the road
- B. The workers might get hit by passing cars
- C. The men would fall to their deaths
- D. The men would be attacked by animals.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The roadway was dangerous to build because the men involved in the construction were at risk of falling to their deaths. The excerpt mentions that the construction of the roadway was the most dangerous and treacherous part of the entire task, indicating a high risk of falling due to the height and precarious nature of the construction site. Choice A is incorrect because the danger was due to the physical risks of falling and not due to a lack of materials. Choice B is incorrect as passing cars were not the primary danger during the construction of the roadway. Choice D is incorrect since there is no mention of workers being attacked by animals during the construction of the Golden Gate Bridge.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
HESI A2 Basic
$99/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access
HESI A2 Premium
$149.99/ 90 days
- Actual HESI A2 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access