ATI TEAS 7
TEAS Reading Questions
1. Which of the following is an opinion, rather than a historical fact, expressed by the author?
- A. Leif Erikson was definitely the son of Erik the Red.
- B. Leif Erikson's crew called the land Vinland.
- C. Leif Erikson deserves more credit for his accomplishments.
- D. Leif Erikson explored the Americas nearly five hundred years before Columbus.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The statement 'Leif Erikson deserves more credit for his accomplishments' is an opinion rather than a historical fact. Historical facts can be verified through evidence and documentation, while opinions are subjective viewpoints. Choices A, B, and D provide historical facts about Leif Erikson's lineage, the name given to the land he discovered, and his exploration, respectively, which can be supported by historical records and research.
2. What is the purpose of the subtitle 'A Trivial Comedy for Serious People' in the context of the play?
- A. To emphasize the seriousness of the social critique in the play.
- B. To downplay the seriousness of the play and present it as light-hearted.
- C. To reflect the trivial nature of the characters' concerns and lives.
- D. To highlight the absurdity of taking serious matters lightly.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The subtitle 'A Trivial Comedy for Serious People' in Oscar Wilde's play 'The Importance of Being Earnest' serves to reflect the trivial concerns of the characters and the superficiality of their lives. Wilde uses this subtitle to highlight the irony in portraying seemingly serious people who are preoccupied with trivial matters and appearances. Choice A is incorrect because the subtitle does not aim to emphasize the seriousness of the social critique but rather the triviality of the characters' lives. Choice B is incorrect as the subtitle doesn't downplay the seriousness of the play; instead, it juxtaposes the trivial with the serious. Choice D is incorrect because the subtitle does not aim to highlight the absurdity of taking serious matters lightly, but rather to underscore the triviality of the characters' concerns and behaviors.
3. What is the author's purpose in discussing aquatic insects in relation to those that spend their entire lives in the air?
- A. To emphasize the adaptability and complexity of insect life cycles.
- B. To compare aquatic insects with those that remain airborne.
- C. To highlight the unique features of insects that live in both environments.
- D. To question the validity of studying insects that live in only one environment.
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The author's purpose in discussing aquatic insects in relation to those that spend their entire lives in the air is to emphasize the adaptability and complexity of insect life cycles. The author highlights how some insects transition between aquatic and aerial environments, showcasing the diverse strategies and features these insects possess to thrive in different habitats. Choice B is incorrect because the author is not solely comparing aquatic insects with those that remain airborne, but rather exploring their adaptability. Choice C is incorrect as the focus is not on highlighting unique features but on showcasing the transition between environments. Choice D is incorrect as the author is not questioning the validity of studying insects in only one environment but rather demonstrating the fascinating dual-life cycles of certain insects.
4. What is the author's point of view?
- A. First person
- B. Third person limited
- C. Third person omniscient
- D. Objective
Correct answer: B
Rationale: The passage is told from a third person limited point of view because the thoughts and perspectives of two specific characters, Michael and Lana June, are presented. The narrator provides insight into their thoughts, but remains limited to their viewpoints without revealing the thoughts of any other characters. This extract demonstrates the limited perspective by showing the inner thoughts of Michael and Lana June, indicating a third person limited narrative. Third person omniscient would involve knowing the thoughts of all characters, which is not the case here. First person would involve using 'I' to narrate, which is absent. Objective point of view would present only observable actions without any character's thoughts or feelings, which is not the case in this passage.
5. What is the primary purpose of the passage?
- A. Analyze an interesting feature of American cinema.
- B. Refute the Western paradigm.
- C. Suggest a way to improve war movies.
- D. Suggest that viewers think critically about underlying assumptions in the movies we watch.
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The primary purpose of the passage is to suggest that viewers think critically about the underlying assumptions in the movies they watch. It discusses how American war movies often conform to a Western paradigm and urges readers to analyze these portrayals and question the messages being conveyed. Choice A is incorrect because the passage does not focus on analyzing an interesting feature of American cinema but rather on prompting critical thinking. Choice B is incorrect as the passage does not aim to refute the Western paradigm but rather to highlight its influence on American war movies. Choice C is incorrect as the passage does not suggest a way to improve war movies but rather encourages viewers to be more mindful and aware of the underlying assumptions in the movies they consume.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$150/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$99/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access