which of the following conclusions can be taken from the passage
Logo

Nursing Elites

ATI TEAS 7

TEAS Reading Practice Questions

1. Which of the following conclusions can be drawn from the passage?

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct conclusion that can be drawn from the passage is that plastic pollution poses a significant environmental threat due to its lasting nature and difficulty in recycling. The passage highlights the challenges of recycling plastic due to its low quality when recycled, leading to pollution and environmental hazards. It mentions the presence of a large island of plastic in the Pacific Ocean, showing the severe impact of plastic pollution on the environment. Therefore, choice A is the most accurate conclusion. Choice B is incorrect as the passage mentions that plastic has many advantages despite its recycling challenges. Choice C is incorrect as the passage indicates that recycling plastic is difficult due to its low quality when recycled. Choice D is incorrect as the passage clearly states that plastic consumption by marine life like fish and birds is a reality, showing the impact of plastic pollution on marine ecosystems.

2. What is a likely purpose for including so many headlines at the start of the article?

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Including multiple headlines at the start of an article allows for the quick conveyance of the most important information about a significant event. In the case of the article about the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, the headlines serve as brief summaries of key details, such as the event itself, the perpetrator, the status of the President, and related incidents like the attempted assassination of Secretary Seward. These headlines help readers grasp the main points efficiently without having to read through the entire article. The purpose is to summarize the key details and attract readers' attention to engage them in the content. Choice B is incorrect because the purpose is not to sensationalize the story but to inform. Choice C is incorrect as the intention is not to incite panic but to provide essential information. Choice D is incorrect because the headlines serve a meaningful purpose and are not included just to fill empty space on the page.

3. Which of the following is not a reliable resource for a research paper?

Correct answer: D

Rationale: Wikipedia is not a reliable source for a research paper due to its open editing format, which may lead to inaccuracies, bias, and lack of authority. While it can be a good starting point for research and general information, it is crucial to verify information from Wikipedia with more academic and reputable sources like peer-reviewed journals, books, or official websites. The New York Times, a personal interview with a politician, and a medical journal are generally considered reliable sources for research papers. The New York Times is a reputable newspaper, personal interviews can provide valuable firsthand insights, and medical journals undergo rigorous peer review processes to ensure accuracy and reliability.

4. What is the main argument of this essay?

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The main argument of the essay is that technology will soon replace printed material, specifically printed books. The passage discusses how the rise of the Internet and electronic devices like the iPad and Kindle are making printed books unnecessary. It presents a progression from oral tradition to printed books and now to digital and electronic options. The essay highlights how the convenience and multi-functionality of devices like the iPad and Kindle will lead to the eventual demise of printed books. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect because while they are mentioned in the essay, they are not the central argument. The essay focuses on the transition from printed material to digital and electronic options, making choice D the correct answer.

5. What is one idea that the students above seem to agree on, based on their statements?

Correct answer: B

Rationale: Both Lisa Grant and Vivian Harris express the idea that schools should give students a certain amount of respect. Lisa Grant believes that wearing uniforms would help students respect each other based on ideas and character rather than appearance. Vivian Harris, on the other hand, argues against uniforms, emphasizing that clothing is crucial for self-expression and taking it away suppresses students' rights. However, at the core of both their arguments is the underlying theme of advocating for respect towards students.

Similar Questions

Which title is the best choice for this passage?
Which of the following represents an opinion statement on the part of the author?
What is one point on which the scientist and politician agree?
Which of the following most accurately describes the author's main conclusion?
Why did Julia not return to work after the alarm?

Access More Features

ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$149.99/ 90 days

  • Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
  • 3,000 questions with answers
  • 90 days access

ATI TEAS Basic
$99/ 30 days

  • 3,000 Questions with answers
  • 30 days access

Other Courses