which of the following best describes the authors intent in the passage

ATI TEAS 7

TEAS Reading Questions

1. Which of the following best describes the author's intent in the passage?

A. to persuade
B. to entertain
C. to express feelings
D. to inform

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The author's intent in the passage is to inform the reader about the historical events surrounding King James II, his family, and the succession of the English throne. The passage provides a detailed account of the lineage, religious affiliations, and the political implications of James II and his descendants. It does not aim to persuade, entertain, or express feelings, but rather presents a factual narrative of historical events. Therefore, choice D, 'to inform,' is the correct answer. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect because the passage is focused on presenting historical information rather than persuading, entertaining, or expressing emotions.

2. To which section of the library should Jorgen go to locate these works?

A. 100
B. 200
C. 700
D. 800

Correct answer: D

Rationale: Jorgen should go to Section 800 to locate The Iliad and The Odyssey by Homer. These works are literary masterpieces and would be categorized under literature in the library. While sections 100, 200, and 700 cover Philosophy and psychology, Religion, and Arts and recreation respectively, they are not the most suitable sections for finding works of literature like The Iliad and The Odyssey.

3. How did Araminta Ross come to be known as Harriet Tubman?

A. She changed her name to her husband's last name and her first name to her mother's name.
B. She was named after the plantation owner's wife.
C. She changed her name because she was wanted as an Underground Railroad runner.
D. She changed her name to remain anonymous as a Civil War spy.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Araminta Ross came to be known as Harriet Tubman after marrying a free black man named John Tubman. She took her husband's last name 'Tubman' and changed her first name to 'Harriet,' which was her mother's name. This change of name was a personal choice after her marriage and not because she was named after the plantation owner's wife (B), wanted as an Underground Railroad runner (C), or to remain anonymous as a Civil War spy (D). Therefore, the correct answer is A.

4. From where is the author most likely drawing the statements in the passage?

A. The writer's local university library
B. The online writing lab at Purdue University
C. Archive of recorded poetry and literature
D. The writer's own knowledge and experience about theatre

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The correct answer is D because the passage vividly describes the experience of going to the theatre, highlighting personal feelings and emotions that the author relates to. The passage emphasizes the connection between the audience and the story, indicating a personal perspective rather than research from a library, online source, or archive. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect because the passage's content is focused on personal experiences and emotions related to the theatre, rather than academic or recorded sources.

5. What is implied by the following sentence? It is hoped the wounds may not be mortal. My apprehension is that they will prove fatal.

A. Those involved are hopeful for a positive outcome.
B. There is no hope that Seward or Lincoln will recover from their wounds.
C. The writer is pessimistic about whether Seward will recover from his wounds.
D. The writer is doubtful about the legitimacy of accounts regarding the night's events.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The sentence 'My apprehension is that they will prove fatal' indicates that the writer is pessimistic about Seward's recovery from his wounds. This implies a lack of hope or certainty about the outcome, suggesting a negative view on the situation. Choice A is incorrect because the sentence does not refer to all involved parties being hopeful. Choice B is incorrect as it is too extreme, stating there is no hope for recovery. Choice D is incorrect as there is no indication in the sentence that the writer doubts the legitimacy of the accounts.