Nursing Elites

1. What is the best summary of this article?

• A. The assassin who tried to kill President Lincoln and Secretary Seward escaped into the night. After having fired his pistol at the president, he barely eluded authorities and hurried to Seward's residence. There, he stabbed both the secretary and his son, Frederick Seward.
• B. A single assassin went on a rampage tonight, starting at Ford's Theater and absconding into the night. He currently remains at large.
• C. President Lincoln was shot by an assassin at Ford's Theater; the president is not expected to survive. Secretary Seward and his son were also attacked by an assassin at their home this evening. They remain unconscious, and their chances of survival are questionable. General Grant was scheduled to be at the theater, but changed his plans and was not harmed by the evening's events.
• D. General Grant is poised to take over the role of the presidency should President Lincoln die from wounds inflicted upon him at Ford's Theater. Grant was present at a recent Cabinet meeting, where Lincoln expressed hope for the future and spoke kind words about General Lee and the Confederacy.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: Choice C is the best summary of the article. It encapsulates the key events that occurred, including President Lincoln being shot at Ford's Theater, the attack on Secretary Seward and his son at their home, and General Grant avoiding harm. It accurately reflects the major developments and outcomes of the tragic events described in the article. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because they either focus on specific aspects of the events and omit critical details or introduce irrelevant information not present in the article extract.

2. Which of the following statements could NOT provide support for BOTH arguments?

• A. A number of local school districts have recently implemented dress codes.
• B. School administrators have been in talks with parents over the issue of uniforms.
• C. Students have reported that school uniforms are costly and typically ill-fitting.
• D. Several groups of students have been organized to discuss uniform dress codes.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C because the statement about the cost and fit of uniforms could only support the argument against uniforms, not both arguments. It aligns more with Vivian Harris's stance against uniforms, emphasizing the importance of clothing as a form of self-expression. Choices A, B, and D are more neutral statements that could provide support for both arguments by indicating actions being taken or discussions being held regarding uniforms without leaning towards a specific stance.

3. When evaluating the credibility of a source during research, which statement is true?

• A. The author's reputation is more important than whether they cite sources.
• B. The source should always be as recent as possible, considering the subject.
• C. The author's point of view and/or purpose is crucial for credibility.
• D. The kinds of sources various audiences value influence credibility for them.

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The kind of sources different audiences value can indeed influence the credibility of a source for them. Different audiences may place varying levels of trust in different types of sources, such as peer-reviewed journals, government reports, or mainstream media outlets. Understanding the preferences of the target audience is essential for establishing credibility when presenting information. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect. The author's reputation is important but not more critical than citing sources, as proper citations contribute to transparency and reliability. The recency of a source is essential but not always the most crucial factor; relevance to the subject matter is also significant. The author's point of view and purpose are indeed relevant to assessing credibility; understanding their biases and intentions is vital in evaluating the reliability of a source.

4. Which of the following would be the best concluding statement for this passage?

• A. States should consider how important foreign languages are in the global economy when making their policies regarding foreign language requirements for high school graduation.
• B. Policies regarding a foreign language requirement for high school graduation should take into account the importance of foreign languages for the global economy and the correlation between foreign languages and increased college acceptance rates and employment opportunities.
• C. High school graduation requirements should include a foreign language class because of the influence knowledge of a second language has on college acceptance rates.
• D. Policies regarding a foreign language requirement for high school graduation should take into account how difficult it is to obtain a job in today's economy for those who do not have knowledge of more than one language.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: Option B provides the most comprehensive and accurate summary of the claims made in the passage. It addresses the significance of foreign languages for the global economy, the impact on college acceptance rates and job opportunities, and the need for policies to consider these factors when determining foreign language requirements for high school graduation. The passage emphasizes the importance of foreign languages in the global economy and the advantages they bring in terms of college acceptance and employment. Option A is less specific and doesn't mention college acceptance rates or job opportunities, making it less comprehensive. Option C focuses only on college acceptance rates and does not touch upon the broader aspects highlighted in the passage. Option D, while mentioning job prospects, does not cover the full scope of the benefits of foreign language proficiency as discussed in the passage.

5. When evaluating the credibility of research sources, which of the following is a valid consideration?

• A. It is credible if published in a peer-reviewed scholarly journal.
• B. It is never credible if it is a source published online.
• C. It is not necessarily more credible based on author affiliations.
• D. The number of times a source is cited does not affect its credibility.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A. It is credible if published in a peer-reviewed scholarly journal because peer review ensures that the research has been evaluated by experts in the field for quality and accuracy before publication. This process enhances the credibility of the research source. Choice B is incorrect because not all online sources are unreliable; credibility depends on various factors beyond the publication medium. Choice C is incorrect because author affiliations can indeed impact credibility, but they are not the sole determinant. Choice D is incorrect as the frequency of citations can indicate the impact of a source but does not guarantee its credibility.

Similar Questions