what is a secondary argument the author makes

ATI TEAS 7

Reading TEAS Practice Test

1. What is a secondary argument the author makes?

A. Devices such as the iPad or Kindle are better than books because they have multiple uses.
B. Books are still important to have while waiting for an appointment or taking a flight.
C. Printed encyclopedias are still used and more convenient than using the Internet.
D. With technology, there will soon be no need for stories.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The secondary argument made by the author is that devices such as the iPad and Kindle are superior to printed books because they offer multiple functions beyond just reading. The author mentions that these devices have qualities similar to a computer and can be used for much more than just reading, making them a more versatile option compared to traditional books. Choice B is incorrect because the author does not emphasize the importance of books for specific situations like waiting for appointments or flights. Choice C is incorrect as the author does not compare printed encyclopedias to the Internet. Choice D is incorrect as the author does not suggest that technology will eliminate the need for stories; instead, they focus on the transition from printed books to electronic devices for reading.

2. Based on the context, which of the following is the meaning of the word move in the passage?

A. drive
B. sell
C. advance forward
D. change location

Correct answer: B

Rationale: In the context provided, the word 'move' is used to indicate that the vehicles are 'marked to move quickly,' which implies that they are intended to be sold rapidly. Therefore, the correct meaning of 'move' in this context is 'sell.' Options A, C, and D do not accurately capture the intention of the word as it is used in the passage. While 'advance forward' (Option C) might seem plausible, the context of a sales event and the urgency to buy due to low prices indicate that 'sell' is the most fitting interpretation.

3. Which statement is not a detail from the passage?

A. Promoters of dietary supplements can make any claims that are supported by research.
B. GMP requirements for large manufacturers went into effect in 2008.
C. The FDA regulates dietary supplements in the same way as prescription medications.
D. Consumers should research supplement claims before making a purchase.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The statement "Promoters of dietary supplements can make any claims that are supported by research" is not a detail from the passage. The passage mentions that manufacturers, not promoters, can make claims supported by research. The primary focus is on the regulations and manufacturing standards for dietary supplements. Choice B is a detail from the passage as it mentions the GMP requirements for large manufacturers going into effect in 2008. Choice C is incorrect as the passage states that FDA regulations for dietary supplements are not the same as those for prescription medications. Choice D is also supported by the passage, emphasizing that consumers should research supplement claims before making a purchase to ensure accuracy and safety.

4. From where is the author most likely drawing the statements in the passage?

A. The writer's local university library
B. The online writing lab at Purdue University
C. Archive of recorded poetry and literature
D. The writer's own knowledge and experience about theatre

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The correct answer is D because the passage vividly describes the experience of going to the theatre, highlighting personal feelings and emotions that the author relates to. The passage emphasizes the connection between the audience and the story, indicating a personal perspective rather than research from a library, online source, or archive. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect because the passage's content is focused on personal experiences and emotions related to the theatre, rather than academic or recorded sources.

5. Which of the following supports evaluating a logical argument?

A. Unbiased information
B. Generalizations
C. Emotional statements
D. Anecdotes

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Unbiased information is crucial for assessing the validity and soundness of an argument. It helps in making informed judgments based on facts rather than personal opinions or biases. Choice B, generalizations, can oversimplify complex issues and lack specific evidence, making them unreliable for evaluating logical arguments. Emotional statements (Choice C) can cloud judgment and introduce subjective elements that may not be logically relevant. Anecdotes (Choice D) are specific instances that may not represent the overall truth or validity of an argument, making them less reliable for logical evaluation.