what can one reasonably conclude from the final comment of this passage if he be mr hyde he had thought i should be mr seek

ATI TEAS 7

TEAS Reading Practice Test

1. What can one reasonably conclude from the final comment of this passage? 'If he be Mr. Hyde,' he had thought, 'I should be Mr. Seek.'

A. The speaker is considering changing names.
B. The speaker is experiencing a determination to find Hyde.
C. The speaker has mistakenly been looking for the wrong person.
D. The speaker intends to continue to look for Hyde.

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The correct answer is D. The speaker's final comment indicates a determination to keep looking for Hyde, as he expresses his intention to become 'Mr. Seek' if the other person is indeed 'Mr. Hyde.' This shows that the speaker is persistent in his search for Hyde, as he believes that discovering Hyde's identity could potentially unravel the mystery and clarify his friend's strange behavior. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect because the final comment does not imply a name change, an identity crisis, or a mistaken search but rather a firm decision to continue seeking out Hyde.

2. What event marked the start of Rosa Parks' central role in the Civil Rights Movement?

A. Her arrest for not giving up her seat.
B. Her involvement in protests.
C. She became an advocate for voting rights.
D. She became a central figure in the Civil Rights Movement.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Rosa Parks' arrest for not giving up her seat on the bus was the event that marked the start of her central role in the Civil Rights Movement. This act of civil disobedience sparked the Montgomery Bus Boycott and brought national attention to the issue of racial segregation. Choice B is incorrect as her arrest, not just her involvement in protests, was the turning point. Choice C is also incorrect as her advocacy for voting rights came later in her civil rights activism. Choice D is incorrect as the event of her arrest was the beginning of her prominent role, not a consequence of already being a central figure.

3. Based on the passages, what can we infer about the relationship between assault and lethal force?

A. An act of lethal force always results from a type of assault.
B. An assault will lead to the use of lethal force by someone.
C. An assault with deadly intent can lead to an individual using lethal force to preserve their well-being.
D. If someone uses self-defense in a conflict, it is considered deadly force; if actions or threats are intended, it is classified as assault.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: From the passages provided, it can be inferred that an assault with deadly intent can lead to an individual using lethal force to defend themselves and preserve their well-being. This suggests a relationship between assault with deadly intent and the potential use of lethal force in self-defense situations. Choice A is incorrect because lethal force is not always a direct result of assault, as it depends on the circumstances. Choice B is incorrect as not all assaults lead to the use of lethal force by someone. Choice D is incorrect as the definition of deadly force and assault are distinct, with deadly force typically being used in self-defense situations where there is an immediate threat of severe harm or death.

4. A recycling company collects sorted materials from its clients. The materials are weighed and then processed for re-use. The chart shows the weights of various classes of materials that were collected by the company during a representative month. Which of the following statements is NOT supported by the data in the chart?

A. Paper products, including cardboard, make up a majority of the collected materials.
B. One quarter of the materials collected are made of glass.
C. More plastic is collected than cardboard.
D. Plastic and cardboard together represent a larger portion of the collected materials than glass bottles.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The chart data does not support the statement that more plastic is collected than cardboard. Looking at the chart data, we can see that paper products, including cardboard, make up the majority of the collected materials. Glass accounts for one quarter of the materials collected. When we compare plastic and cardboard, we can see that cardboard weighs more than plastic. Therefore, the statement that more plastic is collected than cardboard is not supported by the data. Additionally, combining plastic and cardboard weights still does not exceed the weight of glass bottles according to the chart.

5. Which of the following supports evaluating a logical argument?

A. Unbiased information
B. Generalizations
C. Emotional statements
D. Anecdotes

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Unbiased information is crucial for assessing the validity and soundness of an argument. It helps in making informed judgments based on facts rather than personal opinions or biases. Choice B, generalizations, can oversimplify complex issues and lack specific evidence, making them unreliable for evaluating logical arguments. Emotional statements (Choice C) can cloud judgment and introduce subjective elements that may not be logically relevant. Anecdotes (Choice D) are specific instances that may not represent the overall truth or validity of an argument, making them less reliable for logical evaluation.