Nursing Elites

1. From the extract, what is the author's point of view?

• A. First person
• B. Third person limited
• C. Third person omniscient
• D. Objective

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C, third person omniscient. The author provides insight into the thoughts of multiple characters, such as Michael and Lana June, indicating knowledge beyond what a single character could perceive. This omniscient viewpoint allows readers to understand the perspectives of different individuals, enhancing the depth and complexity of the narrative. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because the extract demonstrates a narrative style that extends beyond a single character's viewpoint, revealing thoughts and feelings of various characters.

2. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the explanation proposed by the author in Passage I, third paragraph?

• A. An instance of lethal force in self-defense is not absolutely absolved from blame. The law takes into account the necessary use of force at the time it is committed.
• B. An individual who uses necessary defense under lethal force is in direct compliance with the law under most circumstances.
• C. Lethal force in self-defense should not be forgiven in all cases for the peace of mind of the primary victim.
• D. The use of lethal force is not evaluated based on the intent of the user, but rather the severity of the primary attack that warranted self-defense.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A because the author in Passage I discusses the concept of lethal force in self-defense being justified and absolved from blame when used as a last resort to prevent severe harm or death. Choice A undermines this by stating that an instance of lethal force in self-defense is not absolutely absolved from blame and highlights that the law considers the necessary use of force at the time it is committed. This challenges the absolute justification of such actions and would seriously undermine the author's argument. Choice B is incorrect because compliance with the law does not necessarily address the justification and absolution of lethal force. Choice C is incorrect as forgiving lethal force in all cases is not the focus of the author's argument. Choice D is incorrect because the intent of the user is a crucial factor in evaluating the use of lethal force, contrary to what is stated.

3. Which organizational style is used in the following passage? 'There are several reasons why the new student café has not been as successful as expected. One factor is that prices are higher than originally advertised, so many students cannot afford to buy food and beverages there.'

• A. Cause and effect order
• B. Compare and contrast order
• C. Spatial order
• D. Time order

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct organizational style used in the passage is cause and effect order. It explains the reasons (causes) why the new student café has not been successful, specifically mentioning that the higher prices lead to students being unable to afford food and beverages (effect). The passage clearly establishes a relationship between a situation (high prices) and its consequences (students not able to buy), making it a classic example of cause and effect. Choice B (Compare and contrast order) is incorrect as the passage does not present a comparison or a contrast between two or more items or situations. Choice C (Spatial order) is incorrect as it refers to organizing information based on physical location or direction, which is not applicable in this context. Choice D (Time order) is also incorrect as it involves organizing information based on a sequence of events over time, which is not the primary focus of the passage.

4. How does the author generally present the information in the extract?

• A. Chronological order
• B. Comparison-contrast
• C. Cause-effect
• D. Conclusion-premises

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The author generally presents the information in a cause-effect format. The scientist talks about the increase in carbon dioxide emissions by countries like China, India, and Brazil leading to rising global temperatures. The politician, on the other hand, argues against a causal link between carbon emissions and temperature increase, suggesting a natural rise in temperatures. The information is structured around the cause of carbon emissions and its effect on global temperatures. Choice A, chronological order, is incorrect as the information is not presented in a time sequence but rather based on cause and effect. Choice B, comparison-contrast, is not the best description as the focus is more on cause and effect rather than comparing or contrasting different elements. Choice D, conclusion-premises, is also incorrect as the information does not follow the pattern of drawing conclusions based on premises but rather discusses the relationship between carbon emissions and temperature increase.

5. Which of the following conclusions is supported by all the details provided about Eleanor Roosevelt's activities during the war in the Pacific?

• A. Eleanor Roosevelt was a dedicated and compassionate individual.
• B. Eleanor Roosevelt was a skilled military strategist.
• C. Eleanor Roosevelt was the commander of the troops in the Pacific.
• D. Eleanor Roosevelt was a professional athlete.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The exhaustive description of Eleanor Roosevelt's activities during the war in the Pacific showcases her dedication and compassion towards the troops and wounded. She tirelessly visited multiple Islands, inspected hospitals, delivered speeches, attended receptions, and interacted with convalescing officers and patients. Her efforts to lift spirits, boost morale, and personally connect with the wounded illustrate her as a dedicated and compassionate individual. The other choices are incorrect as there is no mention of her being a military strategist, a commander of troops, or a professional athlete in the provided details.

Similar Questions