ATI TEAS 7
Practice TEAS Test Reading
1. According to the passage, what effect does encountering an automobile with eighteen wheels have on the hypothesis 'All automobiles have only four wheels'?
- A. It proves the hypothesis.
- B. It raises the hypothesis's probability.
- C. It disproves the hypothesis.
- D. It decreases the hypothesis's probability.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: Encountering an automobile with eighteen wheels contradicts the hypothesis that all automobiles have only four wheels. This contradicts the initial hypothesis, proving it to be false. The passage explains that when evidence disproves a hypothesis, it directly contradicts the hypothesis, leading to its disproof. In the context of the monkey example provided, encountering a hairless monkey out of many hairy monkeys disproved the hypothesis 'All monkeys are hairy.' Therefore, the presence of an automobile with eighteen wheels disproves the hypothesis that all automobiles have only four wheels. Other choices are incorrect because encountering such an automobile directly contradicts the initial hypothesis, leading to its disproof, rather than proving it, raising its probability, or decreasing its probability.
2. Which type of evidence is used in the passage?
- A. emotional evidence
- B. appeal to authority
- C. specific evidence
- D. rhetorical questioning
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The passage uses specific evidence to support its claims. It presents factual information about the impact of private tutoring on students' grades, including a comparison of GPAs between students who had different types of tutoring. This specific evidence strengthens the argument by providing concrete data and examples. Emotional evidence, appeal to authority, and rhetorical questioning are not used in this passage, as it primarily relies on data and analysis to make its case.
3. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the explanation proposed by the author in Passage I, third paragraph?
- A. An instance of lethal force in self-defense is not absolutely absolved from blame. The law takes into account the necessary use of force at the time it is committed.
- B. An individual who uses necessary defense under lethal force is in direct compliance with the law under most circumstances.
- C. Lethal force in self-defense should not be forgiven in all cases for the peace of mind of the primary victim.
- D. The use of lethal force is not evaluated based on the intent of the user, but rather the severity of the primary attack that warranted self-defense.
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is A because the author in Passage I discusses the concept of lethal force in self-defense being justified and absolved from blame when used as a last resort to prevent severe harm or death. Choice A undermines this by stating that an instance of lethal force in self-defense is not absolutely absolved from blame and highlights that the law considers the necessary use of force at the time it is committed. This challenges the absolute justification of such actions and would seriously undermine the author's argument. Choice B is incorrect because compliance with the law does not necessarily address the justification and absolution of lethal force. Choice C is incorrect as forgiving lethal force in all cases is not the focus of the author's argument. Choice D is incorrect because the intent of the user is a crucial factor in evaluating the use of lethal force, contrary to what is stated.
4. What is the purpose of the italics used for several of the words identified in the sentence above?
- A. to indicate a full-length published book
- B. to indicate a work of classic literature
- C. to indicate recommended summer reading
- D. to indicate books that Angela completed
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The purpose of the italics used for several words in the sentence is to indicate books that Angela completed during the summer. The italics are used for titles of books or literary works, showing emphasis or highlighting specific titles. In the provided extract, titles like 'The Great Gatsby,' 'Brave New World,' and 'A Passage to India' are italicized, indicating completed readings. Choice A is incorrect as it does not accurately reflect the purpose of italics in this context. Choice B is incorrect because the use of italics does not specifically indicate classic literature. Choice C is also incorrect as the italics are not related to recommendations but rather completion of reading.
5. Which of the following would be a useful source of information to determine the validity of the argument presented in this passage?
- A. A survey of high school students' foreign language preferences
- B. A comparison of the correlation between learning a second language at home and subsequent job placement rates
- C. A survey that asks parents about the foreign language they want their children to study in high school
- D. A comparison of the correlation between high school students' study of a foreign language and subsequent college acceptance rates
Correct answer: D
Rationale: Choice D is the correct answer as it can provide evidence to support the claim made in the passage that high school graduates who studied a foreign language are more likely to be accepted to college. This choice aligns with the argument presented in the passage, making it a useful source. Choices A and C focus on opinions rather than concrete evidence of the impact of studying a foreign language on future success. Choice B is not directly relevant as it talks about learning a second language at home, while the passage specifically discusses the importance of studying a foreign language in high school.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$150/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$99/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access