Nursing Elites

1. What is the significance of the term 'Bunburying' in the context of the play?

• A. It highlights the characters' desire to lead a double life and escape social obligations.
• B. It reflects the characters' indifference to social conventions.
• C. It demonstrates the characters' willingness to deceive themselves and others.
• D. It serves as a metaphor for the characters' struggle to conform to societal expectations.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: 'Bunburying' is significant in the play because it emphasizes the characters' desire to lead double lives and avoid the strict societal expectations placed upon them. The term highlights their need to escape the confines of social obligations through deception and subterfuge. By maintaining a fictional persona like Bunbury, the characters can freely navigate between different social spheres, allowing them to explore personal freedom and evade the constraints of their social status. This escapade showcases their yearning for independence and autonomy, contrasting with the societal norms they are expected to conform to. Choices B, C, and D are incorrect because 'Bunburying' in the context of the play is more about evading social duties through a dual identity, rather than reflecting indifference, willingness to deceive, or struggling to meet societal expectations.

2. Which of the following statements would be LEAST relevant in a formal essay about artist Salvador Dalí?

• A. Although his works are famed for their dream-like qualities, Dalí executed them with realism reminiscent of the Renaissance masters.
• B. Salvador Dalí’s eccentricity extended beyond his artwork, affecting the strange public persona he created, which can be witnessed in his numerous television appearances.
• C. I’ve always found Dalí’s painting The Persistence of Memory to be really disturbing for some reason.
• D. Although Salvador Dalí is best known for his paintings, he also was active in cinema and collaborated with such filmmakers as Luis Bunuel and Alfred Hitchcock.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: Option C is subjective and personal, making it less suitable for a formal essay about Salvador Dalí. In formal writing, it is important to maintain objectivity and focus on factual information rather than personal opinions. Choices A, B, and D provide relevant information about Dalí, his artwork, and his collaborations, which are more appropriate for inclusion in a formal essay.

3. Even without Franz Ferdinand's assassination ... Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

• A. A war between the world powers was extremely likely.
• B. World War I never would have happened.
• C. England, France, and Russia would have started the war.
• D. Austria would have started the war.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A. Given the alliances and tensions at the time, the assassination was simply the trigger in an already volatile situation, making war highly likely. Choice B is incorrect because the alliances and existing tensions would likely have led to a conflict even without the assassination. Choice C is incorrect as it wrongly implies that only these three countries were involved in the conflict. Choice D is incorrect as Austria alone starting the war doesn't consider the broader context of alliances and power dynamics among the world powers.

4. In which chapter should Clothilde look for more information about how to do this?

• A. Chapter 3
• B. Chapter 4
• C. Chapter 2
• D. Chapter 1

Correct answer: B

Rationale: Clothilde should look for more information on how to prune her elderberry plant and utilize the elderflowers for tea and homemade wine in Chapter 4: Herbs in Food. This chapter typically covers information on using herbs in various culinary and beverage preparations, which aligns with Clothilde's goals. Choices A, C, and D are incorrect because Chapter 4, specifically focusing on herbs in food, is the most relevant chapter for Clothilde's inquiry on utilizing elderflowers for tea and wine.

5. Which of the following best describes the way the passages are structured?

• A. Both passages open by defining a legal concept and then continue to describe situations in order to further explain the concept.
• B. Both passages begin with situations, introduce accepted definitions, and then cite legal ramifications.
• C. The first passage presents a long definition while the second passage begins by showing an example of assault.
• D. Both cite specific legal doctrines, then proceed to explain the rulings.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The passages are structured in a way where both begin by defining a legal concept (assault and battery) and then provide further explanations and examples to help clarify and elaborate on the concepts. Both passages open with a clear definition and then proceed to discuss the concept in various situations. Choice A is correct because it accurately captures the structure of the passages. Choice B is incorrect because the passages do not introduce accepted definitions after presenting situations; they define the legal concepts first. Choice C is incorrect because the first passage does not present a long definition, it begins by defining lethal force and then provides examples. Choice D is incorrect because while the passages explain legal concepts, they do not specifically cite legal doctrines or explain rulings.

Similar Questions