Nursing Elites

1. In which units is the speed of light in a vacuum measured?

• A. Meters per second
• B. Hertz
• C. Candela
• D. Newton

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The speed of light in a vacuum is commonly measured in units of meters per second. This is because the speed of light is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second in a vacuum, as defined by the International System of Units (SI). The speed of light is a measure of distance covered by light in a given time, hence it is expressed in meters per second. Choices B, C, and D are incorrect. Hertz is a unit of frequency, Candela is a unit of luminous intensity, and Newton is a unit of force. None of these units are relevant for measuring the speed of light, making 'Meters per second' the correct unit of measurement for the speed of light.

2. Why is the simple columnar epithelium lining the small intestine crucial?

• A. Movement
• B. Support
• C. Absorption
• D. Insulation

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The simple columnar epithelium lining the small intestine is crucial for absorption. This type of epithelium is specialized for absorption due to its tall and closely packed cells, which increase the surface area available for nutrient absorption. The primary function of the small intestine is to absorb nutrients from digested food, and the simple columnar epithelium's structure aids in this process by providing a large surface area for absorption. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because movement, support, and insulation are not primary functions associated with the simple columnar epithelium in the small intestine. While these functions are essential in other tissues or organs, absorption is the key role of the simple columnar epithelium in the small intestine.

3. What is the term for the ability of a substance to dissolve in another substance?

• A. Solubility
• B. Miscibility
• C. Immiscibility
• D. Reactivity

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Solubility is the property that describes the ability of a substance to dissolve in another substance. When a substance is soluble in another, it means it can form a homogeneous solution by dispersing at a molecular level within the solvent. Miscibility, on the other hand, refers to the ability of two liquids to mix and form a homogeneous solution. Immiscibility indicates the inability of substances to mix to form a homogeneous solution. Reactivity pertains to the ability of a substance to undergo chemical reactions, which is distinct from the concept of solubility.

4. The adrenal glands are part of which system?

• A. Immune system
• B. Endocrine system
• C. Lymphatic system
• D. Respiratory system

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B: Endocrine system. The adrenal glands are part of the endocrine system, not the immune, lymphatic, or respiratory system. The endocrine system is responsible for producing and regulating hormones that control various bodily functions. The adrenal glands specifically produce hormones like cortisol and adrenaline, which are critical for the body's response to stress and metabolic processes. The immune system is responsible for defending the body against infections and diseases, the lymphatic system is involved in immunity and fluid balance, and the respiratory system is responsible for gas exchange in the body. Therefore, choices A, C, and D are incorrect in the context of the adrenal glands.

5. If a scientist finds that the results of her experiment seem to contradict her hypothesis, what is the best course of action?

• A. Publish the results anyway, acknowledging that her hypothesis seems to have been incorrect.
• B. Keep trying the experiment until the results match her hypothesis.
• C. Publish the results, retroactively changing the hypothesis.
• D. None of the above; this cannot occur. The experimental results cannot contradict the hypothesis, by definition.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The best course of action is to publish the results anyway, acknowledging that her hypothesis seems to have been incorrect. Science relies on accurate reporting and transparency, even if the results do not align with the original hypothesis. This allows for further discussion, analysis, and potentially new hypotheses to be developed based on the findings. It is essential in scientific research to report both positive and negative results to contribute to the body of knowledge and advance understanding in the field. Choice B is incorrect because persisting with the same experiment to force results to align with the hypothesis goes against scientific integrity and may lead to biased conclusions. Choice C is incorrect as changing the hypothesis after obtaining results is not scientifically sound and undermines the credibility of the research. Choice D is incorrect because science embraces the possibility of experimental results contradicting hypotheses, as this provides valuable insights for refining theories and expanding scientific knowledge.

Similar Questions