ATI TEAS 7
TEAS Reading Questions
1. If these statements above are factual, which of the following statements must be correct?
- A. Outspending other countries on education has benefits beyond standardized tests.
- B. The US education system is corrupt and ineffective.
- C. The standardized math tests do not accurately reflect American proficiency.
- D. Spending more money does not guarantee success on standardized tests.
Correct answer: D
Rationale: Based on the information provided in the extract, it is evident that despite the United States spending a substantial amount on education, it does not translate to top performance in standardized math tests. Countries spending less outperformed the United States, indicating that spending more money does not guarantee success on standardized tests. Choice A is incorrect because the extract does not specify benefits beyond tests. Choice B is incorrect as the extract does not explicitly state that the US education system is corrupt and broken. Choice C is incorrect as the extract talks about the performance on standardized math tests rather than American proficiency in general.
2. What is implied by the following sentence? It is hoped the wounds may not be mortal. My apprehension is that they will prove fatal.
- A. Those involved are hopeful for a positive outcome.
- B. There is no hope that Seward or Lincoln will recover from their wounds.
- C. The writer is pessimistic about whether Seward will recover from his wounds.
- D. The writer is doubtful about the legitimacy of accounts regarding the night's events.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The sentence 'My apprehension is that they will prove fatal' indicates that the writer is pessimistic about Seward's recovery from his wounds. This implies a lack of hope or certainty about the outcome, suggesting a negative view on the situation. Choice A is incorrect because the sentence does not refer to all involved parties being hopeful. Choice B is incorrect as it is too extreme, stating there is no hope for recovery. Choice D is incorrect as there is no indication in the sentence that the writer doubts the legitimacy of the accounts.
3. Which word is most closely synonymous with the word patronage as it appears in the following statement?
- A. Auspices
- B. Aberration
- C. Adulation
- D. Applause
Correct answer: A
Rationale: 'Auspices' is most synonymous with 'patronage' in this context, indicating support or sponsorship. In the provided extract, the author expresses a desire to meet with the working men and their families, indicating a sense of support and sponsorship towards them, aligning with the meaning of 'auspices.' The other choices do not capture the idea of support or sponsorship and are therefore incorrect.
4. Based on the information provided, what is the most logical reason for this?
- A. There are more addresses ending with these numbers than with the other numbers.
- B. All residences and businesses have addresses ending in these numbers, and they consume the most water.
- C. The residents at these addresses are the most likely to consume more water.
- D. The city is more concerned about water usage in the latter part of the week.
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The town of Audley has implemented a water conservation plan with specific watering schedules based on addresses. The city has designated different days for watering based on the ending digits of addresses, suggesting a concern for regulating water usage throughout the week. Choosing option D as the correct answer aligns with the logical reason behind the designated watering schedule. Option A is incorrect as the distribution of addresses ending with specific numbers is not the central reason for the watering schedule. Option B is incorrect as it generalizes that all addresses ending in specific numbers consume the most water, which is not supported by the provided information. Option C is incorrect as it assumes that residents at specific addresses are the most likely to consume more water, which is not explicitly stated in the given extract.
5. What is the author's point of view?
- A. First person
- B. Third person limited
- C. Third person omniscient
- D. Objective
Correct answer: B
Rationale: The passage is told from a third person limited point of view because the thoughts and perspectives of two specific characters, Michael and Lana June, are presented. The narrator provides insight into their thoughts, but remains limited to their viewpoints without revealing the thoughts of any other characters. This extract demonstrates the limited perspective by showing the inner thoughts of Michael and Lana June, indicating a third person limited narrative. Third person omniscient would involve knowing the thoughts of all characters, which is not the case here. First person would involve using 'I' to narrate, which is absent. Objective point of view would present only observable actions without any character's thoughts or feelings, which is not the case in this passage.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$150/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$99/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access