Nursing Elites

1. Based on the preceding words, what is the correct meaning of the suffix -fy in glorify, fortify, gentrify, acidify?

• A. Marked by, given to
• B. Doer, believer
• C. Make, cause, cause to have
• D. Process, state, rank

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The suffix '-fy' means to make or cause to have. Each word listed—glorify, fortify, gentrify, acidify—indicates a process of transforming or altering something, making the common meaning related to causing or making. Choice A ('Marked by, given to') is incorrect as it does not reflect the action of making or causing. Choice B ('Doer, believer') is unrelated to the suffix -fy and does not capture its meaning. Choice D ('Process, state, rank') is also incorrect as it does not align with the consistent theme of causing or making evident in the words provided.

2. Which of the following sentences contains a homophone?

• A. Each evening, the young woman walked alone on the canal path.
• B. As water is heated up, it slowly begins to expand.
• C. By Sunday, they were ready to raze the old building, and everyone gathered to watch.
• D. The previous tenant had been a chemistry teacher.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C. 'Raze' is a homophone of 'raise,' which means to destroy completely. The other choices do not contain homophones. Choice A talks about a young woman walking on a canal path, choice B discusses water heating up and expanding, and choice D mentions a previous tenant who was a chemistry teacher, none of which involve homophones. Therefore, choice C is the only sentence that contains a homophone, making it the correct answer.

3. What is crucial in technical writing?

• A. Using informal language to connect with the audience.
• B. Emphasizing your expertise with complex jargon.
• C. Explaining concepts clearly and concisely for diverse readers.
• D. Prioritizing creativity and artistic flair in your writing style.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: In technical writing, the primary goal is to explain complex concepts clearly and concisely for diverse readers. Using informal language (Choice A) can undermine the professionalism and clarity expected in technical documents. Emphasizing expertise with complex jargon (Choice B) may alienate readers who are not familiar with technical terminology. Prioritizing creativity and artistic flair (Choice D) may be misleading in technical writing, as the focus should be on clarity and accuracy rather than creative expression. Therefore, the correct choice is to explain concepts clearly and concisely for diverse readers, ensuring that the content is easily understandable and accessible.

4. Every morning we would wake up, eat breakfast, and break camp. Which of the following is the correct revision for the sentence?

• A. NO CHANGE
• B. we would wake up, eat breakfast, and break camp.
• C. would we wake up, eat breakfast, and break camp?
• D. we are waking up, eating breakfast, and breaking camp.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B: 'we would wake up, eat breakfast, and break camp.' The original sentence is a list of actions in the past, so the verb 'break' should also be in the past tense to maintain consistency. Choice A is incorrect because 'broke' is incorrect in this context. Choice C is a question format and does not fit the original sentence structure. Choice D changes the tense to present progressive, which does not match the past tense context of the sentence.

5. What literary device is used in the line 'The sea whispered secrets to the shore'?

• A. Alliteration
• B. Personification
• C. Onomatopoeia
• D. Hyperbole

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B: Personification. Personification is the attribution of human characteristics to non-human things. In this sentence, the sea is given the human ability to whisper, which is a human trait, thus personifying the sea. The other options are incorrect for this specific sentence: Alliteration refers to the repetition of initial consonant sounds, Onomatopoeia is the use of words that imitate sounds, and Hyperbole is an exaggerated statement or claim not meant to be taken literally.

Similar Questions