Nursing Elites

1. Based on the following evidence, what is the most likely reason that spoiled food left out in the open often contains fly larvae?

• A. The spoiled food evolves into fly larvae.
• B. Since the food is left out in the open, flies lay eggs in the food.
• C. Fly larvae are spontaneously generated by the spoiled food.
• D. People only imagine they see fly larvae in the spoiled food.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B. Flies laying eggs in the food when it is left exposed to the air is a common occurrence and a logical explanation for the presence of fly larvae in spoiled food. Choice A is incorrect as food cannot evolve into fly larvae; fly larvae come from eggs laid by flies. Choice C is incorrect as fly larvae do not spontaneously generate from spoiled food but rather develop from eggs laid by flies. Choice D is incorrect as the presence of fly larvae in spoiled food is a real phenomenon, not merely imagined by people.

2. In an experiment where five tropical plants are kept at varying humidity levels in a greenhouse for three months, while one plant is left outside in normal conditions, with plant height measured weekly, what serves as the control of the experiment?

• A. Plant height for each tropical plant
• B. The plant left outside in normal conditions
• C. Humidity level readings in the greenhouse
• D. Amount of time used to study plant height

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B. The plant left outside in normal conditions acts as the control in the experiment. It provides a standard reference point for comparison to assess the impact of the varying humidity levels on the growth of the tropical plants. Choice A is incorrect because it refers to the dependent variable being measured, not the control. Choice C is incorrect as humidity levels in the greenhouse are part of the experimental conditions, not the control. Choice D is incorrect as the time used for studying plant height is a parameter of the experiment and not the control.

3. Which of the following structures in the body is responsible for protecting the lungs and heart?

• A. Rib cage
• B. Pelvis
• C. Femur
• D. Vertebral column

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The rib cage is the correct answer. It plays a crucial role in protecting vital organs like the lungs and heart. The rib cage forms a protective barrier around these organs, shielding them from external trauma or injuries. It acts as a sturdy cage, offering structural support and safeguarding the delicate tissues and structures of the lungs and heart. The pelvis, femur, and vertebral column do not directly protect the lungs and heart; instead, they have other important functions in the body, such as supporting the body's weight, enabling movement, and protecting the spinal cord.

4. Which structure of the nervous system carries an action potential in the direction of a synapse?

• A. Cell body
• B. Axon
• C. Neuron
• D. Myelin

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is the axon. The axon is the elongated, threadlike part of a neuron that carries nerve impulses away from the cell body towards other neurons or target cells, such as muscles or glands, in the direction of a synapse. Action potentials travel along the axon as electrical signals to communicate with neighboring cells. The cell body (choice A) contains the nucleus and organelles but does not transmit action potentials. Neuron (choice C) is a broad term that includes the entire nerve cell, not a specific structure. Myelin (choice D) is a fatty substance that surrounds and insulates axons, aiding in the conduction of nerve impulses, but it does not directly carry the action potential towards a synapse.

5. When defending a scientific argument, which technique is most effective?

• A. Citing other scientists who agree with your argument.
• B. Showing the results of scientific experiments that support your argument.
• C. Describing your scientific credentials, education, and past accomplishments.
• D. Pointing out that no one has come up with a proven alternative explanation.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The most effective technique when defending a scientific argument is to show the results of scientific experiments that support your argument. In the realm of science, evidence-based support is crucial. By presenting concrete data and experimental results, you provide a convincing and reliable foundation for your argument. This method allows others to review, replicate, and verify the findings, thus strengthening the credibility of your position. Choices A, C, and D are not as effective as choice B because citing other scientists who agree with your argument (Choice A) may not carry the same weight as empirical evidence, describing your scientific credentials, education, and past accomplishments (Choice C) may not directly address the validity of your argument, and pointing out that no one has come up with a proven alternative explanation (Choice D) does not provide direct evidence supporting your argument.

Similar Questions