Nursing Elites

1. Which detail from the passage supports the conclusion that the passage takes place in the 21st century?

• A. His office was on the thirtieth floor, far too high to get much more than a faint glow from the street lights below.
• B. Shia froze, as if he were caught by the gaze of Medusa.
• C. He sent his boss a single text message before turning over and trying to force himself to sleep.
• D. Shia didn't stop running until he had burst the ground floor exit to the parking garage and found his car.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C. The reference to sending a text message in the passage is a clear indication of the 21st century. This action of sending a text message is a modern communication method commonly associated with contemporary times. Choices A, B, and D do not provide any specific details or actions that distinctly tie them to the 21st century. Choice A focuses on the location of an office, which does not inherently place the passage in a specific time period. Choice B uses a metaphorical reference to Medusa, which is a mythological figure not limited to any particular era. Choice D describes a scene involving running to a parking garage, which could occur in various time periods without indicating a specific century.

2. Which of the following choices introduces a specific claim and distinguishes it from counterclaims?

• A. Is texting while driving really a critical safety issue? Are all kinds of distracted driving created equal? What can be said about the nature of distracted driving among teenagers?
• B. It's true that distracted driving is dangerous. There may be nothing more dangerous than texting while driving. Texting while driving has resulted in more than 15,000 deaths and over 200,000 injuries. The majority of texting drivers are teens, although other age groups have been implicated.
• C. Texting while driving is one of the key issues facing young people today: it's a fact that texting drivers have killed over 16,000 people between 2002 and
• D. While some argue that texting while driving is just one form of distracted driving, it stands out as particularly hazardous due to the level of focus it diverts from the road. Studies show that drivers who text are 23 times more likely to be involved in an accident compared to other forms of distracted driving.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: Choice B introduces a specific claim that texting while driving is extremely dangerous by stating that 'there may be nothing more dangerous than texting while driving' and supports this claim with statistics on the number of deaths and injuries caused by texting while driving. It further emphasizes the impact by mentioning that the majority of texting drivers are teens. This approach of providing specific evidence helps to distinguish the claim from counterclaims and strengthens the argument. Choices A, C, and D do not introduce a specific claim supported by factual evidence and fail to distinguish it from potential counterclaims, making them less effective in presenting a strong argument.

3. What was the author's purpose in writing this passage about George Washington?

• A. To inform readers about Washington's advice and its relevance to modern times.
• B. To introduce George Washington as a historical figure.
• C. To emphasize that George Washington had a multifaceted role beyond being a military hero.
• D. To persuade readers that George Washington is a hero of liberty.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A: 'To inform readers about Washington's advice and its relevance to modern times.' The passage focuses on Washington's advice, leadership, and legacy, particularly his farewell address, highlighting its significance in current times. This choice accurately reflects the primary purpose of the passage. Choice B is incorrect because the passage goes beyond mere introduction, delving into Washington's actions and beliefs. Choice C is incorrect as while the passage does mention Washington's multifaceted role, the primary focus is on his advice and legacy. Choice D is incorrect because the passage does not aim to persuade readers of Washington's heroism but rather inform them about his advice and principles.

4. Which of the following statements would make the best conclusion to an essay about civil rights activist Rosa Parks?

• A. Rosa Parks refused to give up her bus seat, leading to her arrest.
• B. Rosa Parks was a hero to many, symbolizing the power of ordinary people in bringing about change.
• C. Rosa Parks died in 2005 at the age of 92.
• D. Rosa Parks' actions sparked the Montgomery Bus Boycott, a pivotal event in the Civil Rights Movement.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The best conclusion to an essay about civil rights activist Rosa Parks should reflect her significance and impact. Choice A, while true, focuses on a specific event rather than summarizing her broader influence. Choice C, though factual, is not a strong conclusion as it does not capture the essence of her legacy. Choice D, although related to her actions, is not as encompassing as Choice B. Option B is the most suitable conclusion as it highlights Rosa Parks' heroism, emphasizing how she inspired change and symbolized the power of ordinary individuals in making a difference.

5. According to the passages, which situation would not constitute an illegal use of lethal force?

• A. A disgruntled cashier yells obscenities at a customer.
• B. A thief is seen running away with stolen cash.
• C. A man is attacked in an alley by another man with a knife.
• D. A woman punches another woman in a bar.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C because, according to the passage, lethal force may be legally used in self-defense or to protect others from imminent danger. In the situation where a man is attacked in an alley by another man with a knife, the use of lethal force to defend oneself would not constitute an illegal act. Choices A, B, and D do not involve a situation where the use of lethal force in self-defense would be justified, making them incorrect. A disgruntled cashier yelling obscenities, a thief running away with stolen cash, and a woman punching another woman do not present imminent danger that would justify the use of lethal force.

Similar Questions