which statement from the selection presents a fact rather than an opinion

HESI A2

Reading Comprehension HESI A2

1. Which statement from the selection presents a fact rather than an opinion?

A. One of the worst voice qualities is harshness
B. Harsh voice qualities usually come from too much tension in the throat and jaw
C. Your voice will sound unpleasant if it is shrill, grating, hard, piercing, brassy, too loud, or too nasal
D. Because tension occurs in higher pitched voices, women tend to have shriller voices than men, which usually makes them less desirable public speakers, newscasters, or political candidates

Correct answer: B

Rationale: Statement B, 'Harsh voice qualities usually come from too much tension in the throat and jaw,' presents a fact rather than an opinion. This statement provides a clear and objective observation about the potential cause of harsh voice qualities, based on physical tension in specific areas of the body, which can be objectively measured and identified. Choice A is an opinion as it states 'One of the worst voice qualities is harshness' without providing a verifiable basis. Choice C lists subjective descriptors of an unpleasant voice without stating a definite cause. Choice D introduces a gender-based assertion about voice quality, making it an opinion rather than a factual observation.

2. What is the main idea of the passage about Aromatherapy—Fact or Fiction?

A. Aromatherapy is not a legitimate therapy by anyone’s standards.
B. Lemon and lavender are not healthy scents to inhale or use.
C. More studies are needed to determine if aromatherapy is truly beneficial.
D. Adding aromatherapy to regular treatment will help speed healing.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The main idea of the passage revolves around the skepticism regarding the efficacy of aromatherapy. The mention of needing more studies to determine its true benefits suggests that the current findings are inconclusive. This aligns with choice C, which reflects the need for further research to validate the claims associated with aromatherapy.

3. What is the author's primary purpose for writing the passage on the Amazon Rainforest?

A. To entertain readers with facts about the rainforest.
B. To inform readers about the deforestation of the Amazon.
C. To persuade readers to visit the Amazon Rainforest.
D. To criticize the farming practices in the Amazon.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The author's primary purpose for writing the passage on the Amazon Rainforest is to inform readers about the deforestation and environmental challenges facing the Amazon. The passage provides detailed information about the Amazon Rainforest, its biodiversity, the impact of deforestation on the environment, and the dangers associated with the destruction of the rainforest. Choice A is incorrect because the author's goal is not to entertain but to educate readers. Choice C is incorrect as there is no persuasive language used to encourage readers to visit the Amazon Rainforest. Choice D is also incorrect as the passage does not focus on criticizing farming practices but rather on highlighting the environmental threats and consequences of deforestation.

4. What is the meaning of the word 'abstain' as used in the last paragraph?

A. Dishonor
B. Go without
C. Connect to
D. Liberate

Correct answer: B

Rationale: In the context of the passage, 'abstain' means to refrain from or go without. The passage discusses the challenges of treating individuals with both eating disorders and substance abuse issues. It mentions that while treatment for addiction involves abstinence, it is not possible to completely abstain from food. This highlights the meaning of 'abstain' as 'go without' in this context. The other choices are incorrect: 'Dishonor' does not relate to abstain, 'Connect to' is not synonymous with abstain, and 'Liberate' does not align with the context of the passage.

5. What is the meaning of the word overturn in the last paragraph of the passage?

A. Justify
B. Invalidate
C. Support
D. Review

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The word "overturn" means to invalidate or negate existing guidelines. In this context, the passage questions whether the findings of the study are substantial enough to change established medical recommendations regarding caffeine intake during pregnancy, making option B the appropriate choice.