Nursing Elites

1. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the explanation proposed by the author in Passage I, third paragraph?

• A. An instance of lethal force in self-defense is not absolutely absolved from blame. The law takes into account the necessary use of force at the time it is committed.
• B. An individual who uses necessary defense under lethal force is in direct compliance with the law under most circumstances.
• C. Lethal force in self-defense should not be forgiven in all cases for the peace of mind of the primary victim.
• D. The use of lethal force is not evaluated based on the intent of the user, but rather the severity of the primary attack that warranted self-defense.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A because the author in Passage I discusses the concept of lethal force in self-defense being justified and absolved from blame when used as a last resort to prevent severe harm or death. Choice A undermines this by stating that an instance of lethal force in self-defense is not absolutely absolved from blame and highlights that the law considers the necessary use of force at the time it is committed. This challenges the absolute justification of such actions and would seriously undermine the author's argument. Choice B is incorrect because compliance with the law does not necessarily address the justification and absolution of lethal force. Choice C is incorrect as forgiving lethal force in all cases is not the focus of the author's argument. Choice D is incorrect because the intent of the user is a crucial factor in evaluating the use of lethal force, contrary to what is stated.

2. What is the word 'principal' referring to in the following text?

• A. Primary or chief
• B. An acolyte
• C. An individual who provides nurturing
• D. One in a subordinate position

Correct answer: A

Rationale: In the provided text, 'principal' is referring to the primary or chief individual. The principal secretary for private affairs is considered second only to the treasurer, indicating a position of high importance. The term 'acolyte' (Choice B) refers to a ceremonial assistant, which does not fit the context. 'An individual who provides nurturing' (Choice C) and 'One in a subordinate position' (Choice D) do not accurately describe the role of the 'principal' in the text.

3. What is the definition of the word 'fry' as it appears in the passage?

• A. Fry eggs that have been fertilized.
• B. Young fish capable of feeding themselves.
• C. A place where larvae are kept safe from predators.
• D. Fish prepared to be fried in oil.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B: 'Young fish capable of feeding themselves.' In the provided extract, 'fry' refers to the young fish that are hatched out and are old enough to take charge of themselves. Choice A is incorrect as it refers to a different context of 'fry.' Choice C is incorrect as it describes a location rather than the meaning of 'fry.' Choice D is also incorrect as it provides a definition of 'fry' related to cooking, which is not the intended meaning in the passage.

4. According to the aforementioned passage, what is the speaker's second desire for his time in front of the audience?

• A. To read a Christmas story
• B. For the working man to have a say in the management of the institution designed for his benefit
• C. To have an opportunity to stand in their presence
• D. For the life of the institution to be essential to the audience as a whole

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B. The speaker's second desire for his time in front of the audience is for the working man to have a say in the management of the institution designed for his benefit. This is evident from the passage where the speaker emphasizes the importance of the working man having a share in the management of an institution designed for his benefit. Choice A is incorrect because although reading a Christmas story was mentioned as the first desire, it was not the second desire. Choice C is incorrect as the desire mentioned is not about standing in the audience's presence but rather about the working man having a say in the institution. Choice D is incorrect as it does not align with the speaker's second desire as mentioned in the passage.

5. Which of the following is not a reliable resource for a research paper?

• A. The New York Times
• B. A personal interview with a politician
• C. A medical journal
• D. Wikipedia

Correct answer: D

Rationale: Wikipedia is not a reliable source for a research paper due to its open editing format, which may lead to inaccuracies, bias, and lack of authority. While it can be a good starting point for research and general information, it is crucial to verify information from Wikipedia with more academic and reputable sources like peer-reviewed journals, books, or official websites. The New York Times, a personal interview with a politician, and a medical journal are generally considered reliable sources for research papers. The New York Times is a reputable newspaper, personal interviews can provide valuable firsthand insights, and medical journals undergo rigorous peer review processes to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Similar Questions