HESI A2
HESI A2 Reading Comprehension Practice Test
1. What statement about global warming is made in the passage on the Amazon Rainforest?
- A. Global warming is caused by deforestation.
- B. Global warming is unrelated to deforestation.
- C. Global warming is exaggerated.
- D. Global warming is not a concern.
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The correct statement about global warming in the passage on the Amazon Rainforest is that it is caused by deforestation. The passage explains that cutting down trees in the rainforest increases the amount of carbon dioxide in the air, leading to global warming. This is supported by the fact that the burning of Brazilian rainforests alone produces 200 million metric tons of carbon dioxide a year. Choice B is incorrect as the passage clearly establishes a direct link between deforestation and global warming. Choice C is incorrect as the passage does not suggest that global warming is exaggerated, but rather highlights the harmful effects of deforestation. Choice D is incorrect as the passage emphasizes the serious concern of global warming due to deforestation.
2. What is the meaning of the word compelling as used in the passage about Sunny-Side Up?
- A. Reasonable.
- B. Convincing.
- C. Common.
- D. Worthwhile.
Correct answer: B
Rationale: In this context, "compelling" refers to something that is convincing or persuasive. The passage presents a strong argument in favor of sunlight's benefits, particularly in relation to vitamin D synthesis. Therefore, B is the correct choice as it aligns with the author's intent to present a convincing argument.
3. Which statement would not be inferred by the reader in the passage about Barefoot Running?
- A. Runners who take their shoes off may face some hazards.
- B. Modern running shoes may increase the odds for injury.
- C. Walking barefoot is good for the muscles and tendons.
- D. Before 1950, even Olympic runners ran barefoot.
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The passage does not imply that Olympic runners specifically ran barefoot before 1950. While it discusses historical context regarding running shoes, the claim about Olympic runners is not substantiated within the text, making D the correct answer. It represents an inference that cannot be drawn from the provided information.
4. Which of the following statements is an opinion related to MRSA?
- A. Hand-washing stations are one means of combating MRSA infection.
- B. Not all Staphylococcus bacteria are resistant to antibiotics.
- C. Hospitals in the United States should quickly adopt the use of new germ-fighting textiles.
- D. MRSA infection kills more people in the United States than does HIV/AIDS.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The correct answer is C because it is an opinion rather than a verifiable fact. The statement suggests a recommendation for hospitals to adopt new germ-fighting textiles swiftly, which is a subjective viewpoint and not objectively measurable. Choices A and B are factual statements regarding combating MRSA infection and antibiotic resistance, respectively. Choice D provides a comparison of MRSA infection with HIV/AIDS, which is a factual statement based on statistical data. Therefore, C is the only choice that presents an opinion rather than a fact.
5. What is the author’s primary purpose in writing this essay?
- A. To persuade
- B. To entertain
- C. To analyze
- D. To reflect
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The author’s enthusiastic and supportive tone toward yoga—stating that it is an exercise that "everyone should try"—indicates a clear intent to persuade the audience about the benefits of yoga. This aligns with choice A, as the primary purpose of the essay is to promote yoga as a valuable practice
Similar Questions
Access More Features
HESI A2 Basic
$89/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access
HESI A2 Premium
$129.99/ 90 days
- Actual HESI A2 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access