ATI TEAS 7
Reading TEAS Practice Test
1. Which of the following statements would make the best conclusion to an essay about civil rights activist Rosa Parks?
- A. Rosa Parks refused to give up her bus seat, leading to her arrest.
- B. Rosa Parks was a hero to many, symbolizing the power of ordinary people in bringing about change.
- C. Rosa Parks died in 2005 at the age of 92.
- D. Rosa Parks' actions sparked the Montgomery Bus Boycott, a pivotal event in the Civil Rights Movement.
Correct answer: B
Rationale: The best conclusion to an essay about civil rights activist Rosa Parks should reflect her significance and impact. Choice A, while true, focuses on a specific event rather than summarizing her broader influence. Choice C, though factual, is not a strong conclusion as it does not capture the essence of her legacy. Choice D, although related to her actions, is not as encompassing as Choice B. Option B is the most suitable conclusion as it highlights Rosa Parks' heroism, emphasizing how she inspired change and symbolized the power of ordinary individuals in making a difference.
2. Which of the following best describes the author’s purpose?
- A. The author wants to tell customers about the cars available at Carl’s Car Depot.
- B. The author wants to encourage other car dealerships to lower their prices.
- C. The author wants to provide new and used cars at affordable prices.
- D. The author wants to attract customers to Carl’s Car Depot.
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The author's purpose is to attract customers to Carl's Car Depot. The text from the extract clearly emphasizes the one-day-only summer sale event at Carl’s Car Depot, highlighting the wide range of cars available at discounted prices with special financing options. The author aims to draw in potential customers by presenting compelling offers and creating a sense of urgency. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect because the primary focus is on attracting customers to Carl’s Car Depot by showcasing the available cars and the limited-time sale, not solely informing customers about the cars, urging other dealerships to lower prices, or generally providing affordable cars.
3. Given the information in the passages, which of the following must be true about assault?
- A. Not all assault is considered an expression of lethal force.
- B. There are various forms of assault.
- C. Smaller, weaker people can commit assault.
- D. Assault can be justified in certain situations.
Correct answer: B
Rationale: The passages clearly outline that assault can manifest in different forms, including physical strikes, threatening body language, and provocative language. This variety of actions demonstrates that there are indeed various forms of assault. This choice is correct because it aligns with the information provided in the passages. Choice A is incorrect as the passages differentiate between lethal force and assault, indicating that not all assault involves lethal force. Choice C is incorrect since there are no restrictions mentioned regarding who can commit assault. Choice D is incorrect because the passages do not provide a blanket justification for assault but rather emphasize the unlawful and threatening nature of such actions.
4. In a lesson on mass media, a teacher is showing commercials and analyzing their hidden messages. Which of the following is an example of a commercial that claims professional authority not supported by evidence?
- A. A commercial selling pain relief featuring a professional basketball player who says he uses the product
- B. A commercial for cold medicine narrated by a man in a doctor's coat
- C. A commercial for a new toy showing footage of children playing happily with it
- D. A commercial for a prepared food with testimonials by real consumers
Correct answer: B
Rationale: The commercial for cold medicine narrated by a man in a doctor's coat is the correct answer. This commercial claims professional authority without providing any evidence of the narrator's credentials. While the man may appear to be a doctor with his coat, there is no proof that he is actually a medical professional or that the product is recommended by experts. This lack of evidence can mislead consumers by giving the product an air of legitimacy and credibility without factual support. Choices A, C, and D do not fit the criteria as they involve a professional athlete endorsing a product, children enjoying a toy, and real consumers providing testimonials respectively.
5. Why did Julia not return to work after the alarm?
- A. She was embarrassed that she could not finish the work her boss asked for.
- B. She was tired and wanted to go home.
- C. She got stuck in traffic and could not get back to her office.
- D. Her boss gave her the afternoon off.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The most likely reason Julia did not return to work after the alarm is that she got stuck in traffic and could not get back to her office. The extract provides details about Julia's challenging morning, starting from being woken up early by lawn mowers, having a caffeine-free cup of coffee, facing traffic delays, arriving late at work, and receiving additional work from her boss. These events culminated in Julia deciding to leave after the fire alarm, indicating that being stuck in traffic was the primary reason for her absence. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because there is no direct evidence in the provided extract to support them. Julia's actions suggest that her decision to leave was more related to external factors like traffic issues rather than internal feelings of embarrassment, tiredness, or being given time off by her boss.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$149.99/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$1/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access