ATI TEAS 7
TEAS Reading Practice Questions
1. Which of the following additional pieces of information supports the claim that napping during the workday will help employees 'be happier, healthier, and more productive'?
- A. In 1999, National Napping Day was founded in response to Daylight Saving Time
- B. Rested people have better impulse control, so they are more likely to choose nutritious food over junk food
- C. Multiple companies have designed special seats or pods specifically for getting the optimal workplace nap
- D. A study showing that the best time of the day for a nap is between 2 and 3 p.m.
Correct answer: B
Rationale: The statement that rested people have better impulse control supports the claim that napping during the workday can lead to employees being happier, healthier, and more productive. Improved impulse control can result in better decision-making, including choosing nutritious food over junk food, which contributes to overall well-being and productivity. Choices A, C, and D do not directly address the relationship between napping and improved well-being or productivity, making them less relevant to supporting the claim.
2. What is the main idea of the second paragraph?
- A. One hairy monkey proves the hypothesis 'All monkeys are hairy.'
- B. The same piece of evidence can both confirm and disconfirm a hypothesis.
- C. Confirming and disconfirming evidence affect hypotheses differently.
- D. The scientific method is not a failsafe method for arriving at objective truth.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The main idea of the second paragraph is that confirming and disconfirming evidence can affect hypotheses differently, as stated in the passage - 'Single pieces of evidence then, seem to affect a given hypothesis in radically different ways.' Choice A is incorrect because the paragraph discusses how single pieces of evidence affect hypotheses, not that one hairy monkey proves a hypothesis. Choice B is incorrect as the paragraph focuses on the different effects of evidence on hypotheses, rather than its ability to confirm and disconfirm simultaneously. Choice D is incorrect as the paragraph does not primarily discuss the scientific method's failings but rather the impact of evidence on hypotheses.
3. Which statement is not a detail from the passage?
- A. Promoters of dietary supplements can make any claims that are supported by research.
- B. GMP requirements for large manufacturers went into effect in 2008.
- C. The FDA regulates dietary supplements in the same way as prescription medications.
- D. Consumers should research supplement claims before making a purchase.
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The statement "Promoters of dietary supplements can make any claims that are supported by research" is not a detail from the passage. The passage mentions that manufacturers, not promoters, can make claims supported by research. The primary focus is on the regulations and manufacturing standards for dietary supplements. Choice B is a detail from the passage as it mentions the GMP requirements for large manufacturers going into effect in 2008. Choice C is incorrect as the passage states that FDA regulations for dietary supplements are not the same as those for prescription medications. Choice D is also supported by the passage, emphasizing that consumers should research supplement claims before making a purchase to ensure accuracy and safety.
4. Which event is out of sequence in the story?
- A. Installing the dog run in the backyard.
- B. Enrolling the dog in obedience classes.
- C. The physical exam confirming the dog's health.
- D. The dog's next obedience class.
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer is D because the story describes the sequence of events after adopting the dog. After bringing Robin home, the sequence includes confirming her health with a physical exam, buying supplies, installing a dog run, and then taking her to the vet. Enrolling her in obedience classes is mentioned to start the following week, making it the next logical step. Therefore, the detail about the dog's next obedience class is not out of sequence. Choices A, B, and C are all in the correct sequence according to the events described in the story.
5. Why did Julia not return to work after the alarm?
- A. She was embarrassed that she could not finish the work her boss asked for.
- B. She was tired and wanted to go home.
- C. She got stuck in traffic and could not get back to her office.
- D. Her boss gave her the afternoon off.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The most likely reason Julia did not return to work after the alarm is that she got stuck in traffic and could not get back to her office. The extract provides details about Julia's challenging morning, starting from being woken up early by lawn mowers, having a caffeine-free cup of coffee, facing traffic delays, arriving late at work, and receiving additional work from her boss. These events culminated in Julia deciding to leave after the fire alarm, indicating that being stuck in traffic was the primary reason for her absence. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because there is no direct evidence in the provided extract to support them. Julia's actions suggest that her decision to leave was more related to external factors like traffic issues rather than internal feelings of embarrassment, tiredness, or being given time off by her boss.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$149.99/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$1/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access