Nursing Elites

1. When writing a blog post, what should you consider including?

• A. Long, detailed paragraphs for comprehensive coverage.
• B. Frequent use of emojis and informal slang for a casual tone.
• C. Engaging headlines, subheadings, and bullet points for scannability.
• D. Use academic vocabulary to sound intellectual.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: When writing a blog post, it is crucial to consider including engaging headlines, subheadings, and bullet points for scannability. This formatting is essential as it enhances readability for readers who prefer scanning content rather than reading it thoroughly. Long, detailed paragraphs (Choice A) may overwhelm readers and deter them from engaging with the content. Using emojis and informal slang (Choice B) may not suit all types of blog posts and could potentially diminish the professionalism of the content. While using academic vocabulary (Choice D) can be beneficial in certain contexts, it may not always be necessary or suitable for a broader audience reading a blog post.

2. Because of all your running around, their clients are confused about who's in charge, and the company is losing its competitive edge. Which contraction should be used to correct the error?

• A. Who's
• B. Whos
• C. Who’ll
• D. Who

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct contraction to use in this sentence is 'who's,' which is short for 'who is.' In the given context, 'who's' indicates the correct possessive form, clarifying that the clients are confused about who is in charge. Choice B, 'Whos,' is incorrect as it does not use an apostrophe to indicate the omitted letter. Choice C, 'Who’ll,' is incorrect as it is a contraction for 'who will,' which does not fit the context of the sentence. Choice D, 'Who,' is incorrect as it is not a contraction and does not clarify the intended meaning of the sentence.

3. Cassidy's track and field experience was greater than any in her school's history. Cassidy was quite tall at 5'10". This made hurdling easier, which is where she got her start. It was easy to spot Cassidy with her long ponytail.

• A. Cassidy's track and field experience was greater than any in her school's history.
• B. Cassidy was quite tall at 5'10".
• C. This made hurdling easier, which is where she got her start.
• D. It was easy to spot Cassidy with her long ponytail.

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The detail about Cassidy's ponytail is irrelevant to her track and field experience and can be removed. Choices A, B, and C provide relevant information about Cassidy's track and field experience and how her height contributed to her hurdling skills. However, choice D is the correct answer as it highlights an unrelated detail about her appearance, which does not impact her athletic abilities or achievements in track and field.

4. Which of the following is a simple sentence?

• A. Phillippa walked the dog, and Primula gave the dog a bath.
• B. Phillippa walked and bathed the dog, and Primula helped.
• C. Phillippa walked the dog, while Primula gave the dog a bath.
• D. Phillippa and Primula walked the dog and gave the dog a bath.

Correct answer: D

Rationale: A simple sentence contains only one independent clause. Choice D, 'Phillippa and Primula walked the dog and gave the dog a bath,' is a simple sentence as it consists of a single subject (Phillippa and Primula) and predicate (walked the dog and gave the dog a bath). Choices A, B, and C contain multiple clauses or conjunctions that create compound sentences, making them more complex and not fitting the criteria of a simple sentence.

5. When submitting a paper for publication in an academic journal, what is the best way to cite the sources?

• A. Try out a couple of citation styles and see which one looks best.
• B. Research the citation style of that particular journal and follow it.
• C. Use any style the author likes as long as the author cites them.
• D. Use the citation style the author has always used in their academic papers.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The best way for an author to cite sources when submitting a paper for publication in an academic journal is to research and follow the citation style specified by that particular journal. This ensures that the paper meets the submission standards and requirements of the journal. Option A is incorrect because it suggests trying out different citation styles, which may not align with the journal's requirements. Option C is incorrect because it emphasizes the author's preference over adherence to journal guidelines. Option D is incorrect as it assumes the author's personal style should be used regardless of journal requirements.

Similar Questions