ATI TEAS 7
TEAS Test Reading Questions
1. What can the reader conclude from the passage above?
- A. The kingsnake is dangerous to humans.
- B. The coral snake and the kingsnake are both hunted by the same predators.
- C. It's safe to handle snakes in the woods because you can easily tell whether they're poisonous.
- D. The kingsnake changes its markings when hawks or eagles are close by.
Correct answer: B
Rationale: The correct answer is B. The passage explains that the kingsnake mimics the venomous coral snake's markings to deter predators, particularly hawks and eagles, which cannot differentiate between the two species. This implies that both the coral snake and the kingsnake face similar threats from predators in their shared habitat. Choice A is incorrect because the passage clearly states that the kingsnake is nonvenomous, so it is not dangerous to humans. Choice C is incorrect as the passage highlights that not all snakes with flashy markings are venomous, emphasizing the need for caution. Choice D is incorrect as there is no mention of the kingsnake changing its markings in response to the presence of hawks or eagles in the passage.
2. What is the author’s conclusion about the house on Pine Street?
- A. The house did not have enough bedrooms.
- B. The house did not have a big enough yard.
- C. The house was not in the right neighborhood.
- D. The house was too expensive.
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The author's conclusion about the house on Pine Street is that it was too expensive. This can be inferred from the description provided in the text, where it is mentioned that although the house had enough space inside, it didn't have a big enough yard for their dogs, and the cost of the house was well above their price range. Therefore, the correct answer is D. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect as they do not align with the evidence from the text, which clearly points to the cost being the main issue with the house on Pine Street.
3. Which of the following supports evaluating a logical argument?
- A. Unbiased information
- B. Generalizations
- C. Emotional statements
- D. Anecdotes
Correct answer: A
Rationale: Unbiased information is crucial for assessing the validity and soundness of an argument. It helps in making informed judgments based on facts rather than personal opinions or biases. Choice B, generalizations, can oversimplify complex issues and lack specific evidence, making them unreliable for evaluating logical arguments. Emotional statements (Choice C) can cloud judgment and introduce subjective elements that may not be logically relevant. Anecdotes (Choice D) are specific instances that may not represent the overall truth or validity of an argument, making them less reliable for logical evaluation.
4. What is the best definition of economy as it is used in this passage?
- A. Exchange of money, goods, and services
- B. Delegation of household affairs
- C. Efficient money management
- D. Less expensive
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The correct definition of 'economy' in this passage is 'efficient money management.' The passage emphasizes the importance of expending less than what is earned, which is a key aspect of efficient money management. Choice A, 'Exchange of money, goods, and services,' is too broad and does not capture the essence of the passage. Choice B, 'Delegation of household affairs,' is not directly related to the context of the passage. Choice D, 'Less expensive,' does not encompass the concept of managing money efficiently as discussed in the passage.
5. Which of the following is an opinion, rather than a historical fact, expressed by the author?
- A. Leif Erikson was definitely the son of Erik the Red.
- B. Leif Erikson's crew called the land Vinland.
- C. Leif Erikson deserves more credit for his accomplishments.
- D. Leif Erikson explored the Americas nearly five hundred years before Columbus.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The statement 'Leif Erikson deserves more credit for his accomplishments' is an opinion rather than a historical fact. Historical facts can be verified through evidence and documentation, while opinions are subjective viewpoints. Choices A, B, and D provide historical facts about Leif Erikson's lineage, the name given to the land he discovered, and his exploration, respectively, which can be supported by historical records and research.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$149.99/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$1/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access